Saturday, November 26, 2011

French Navy takes delivery of first new landing craft.

I'm not quite sure of what to make of this...seems slower than an LCAC...is limited to the same type beaches as an LVCP...I guess its home grown is what makes it attractive.

I could be wrong.  Anyway the French Navy just took delivery of the first boat.



On November 24, 2011 the Direction Générale de l'Armement (DGA - French Procurement Agency) has taken delivery of the first fast amphibious landing craft (dubbed EDA-R for "engin de débarquement amphibie rapide"). The EDA-R offers five times the landing capacity of existing landing craft currently in service with the French Navy. The EDA-R will be used by the Marine Nationale's Mistral class LHDs.

Signed in June 2009 as part of an economy stimulus plan, the contract includes the acquisition of 4 EDA-R and their operational maintenance until mid-2015. The other three fast amphibious landing craft will be delivered by mid-2012. 


Holsters and who's deciding this stuff at HQMC????

BlackHawk Serpa

I would love to know who made the decision that now was the time to switch holsters from the M12 to the BlackHawk Serpa line.

Don't get me wrong, I've worn the holster and find it functional in a normal environment, I can't ignore all the reports of the mechanism jamming when dirt, soil or even snow enter it.  An additional worry for me is the issue with the actual protection of the sidearm.  Will this holster provide adequate protection in all environments?

I have my doubts.  I also don't like how this announcement was made.  I didn't read any announcements about a competition.  All I heard was that BlackHawk had been selected to provide the next holster for the Marine Corps.
Compare the new holster with the 'legacy' model.  The 'old' one provides all around protection and although its not a speed holster, do we really need a quick draw rig?

Just by the eyeball test the old holster provides much more protection.  Which brings me back to the one major issue that keeps smacking me upside the head.  When is ideal too much and good enough a viable solution?

Was there some type of issue with the M12 rig that made it completely unworkable?  If not then our Commandant's statement of being frugal is nothing but words that have no basis in reality.  But if by chance they did find a reason why the M12 is unworkable then how about theses offerings...
Bianchi

Safariland

Both provide superior protection and both should be better options (I base my thinking on a non-mechanical retention device...even if the BlackHawk is simple its still more complex than the Bianchi or the Safariland) for Marines that jump or fast rope or actually operate in the field.

Exhibit one.  Our holster selection.  Evidence of a confused and misguided Marine Corps procurement system.

Blast from the past. A-5 Vigilante.



The A-5 Vigilante.

When it looks right it is right and the Vigilante looks right. 

Even today. 

I can only imagine what one of these planes could do with modern avionics...engines and fly by wire controls!  The Navy would have a long range two man strike bomber that it could use in medium threat areas.

If any airplane could perform the modern day F-111/F-15E strike mission from a carrier then it would be a brand new Vigilante!

But enough spitting in the wind.  More on this beauty is here.

European de-militarization is fueling Pacific militarization.


Europe is demilitarizing.

And with Europe making itself less relevant, it making the militarization of the Pacific accelerate.  Check this out from Tempointinteractive...
The government will buy a German Army Leopard tank and Apache helicopter, Defense Minister Purnomo Yusgiantoro has confirmed.


Indonesia is also looking at buying main weaponry systems from France, the Netherlands, Germany, Italy and Spain. These countries have recently reduced their military budgets.


Purnomo said the budget would depend on the equipment that will be purchased, but assured that spending would not exceed the targeted budget. Currently, he added, the Defense Ministry is waiting on the list of weapons required by the army, navy and air force. “We haven’t decided about the budget to buy the equipment from Europe,” he said.


Previously, the Army chief of staff, Gen. Pramono Edhie Wibowo, said his unit was given a special allocation of Rp14 trillion to buy weapons, including 100 2A6 Leopard tanks and eight Apache helicopters.


Other weapons to be purchased include multi-barrel rocket launchers, a helicopter type 1412 and a 155 mm cannon from France. Pramono said that only 15 countries in the world use the 2A6 Leopard. “In Southeast Asia, only Singapore has it,” he said.
Wow.

Maybe my thoughts on taking a capability holiday and dropping Tanks from Marine Corps rosters needs to be re-examined.

Singapore has new tanks.  China has new tanks.  India has new tanks and it appears that there is an armor race in the Pacific.

Maybe we should keep ours awhile.  Damn.  Another decision for HQMC to make.  Can we afford to stick with the M1A1 or do we join the Army with an upgrade to the M1A3?

We better get this right.  KMW pumps out upgrades like a pez dispenser...in some ways the Leopard 2A7 is already superior to the M1A2 TUSK....Who knew?  We have to prepare for armored warfare in the Pacific now!

Police Sniper in Egypt is accused of shooting suspects in the eye with rubber bullets.

Read the whole thing from CNN but this Police Sniper is going to wake up dead once they find out where he lives...I digress...here's a juicy bit.

El Shinawi has been on duty on Cairo's Mohamed Mahmoud street during the recent clashes and is a "highly trained marksman," 1st Lt. Alaa Mahmoud, an Interior Ministry spokesman, told CNN. The spokesman declined to comment on the specific accusations against El Shinawi.
One of the suspect's alleged victims is Ahmed Harrara. Harrara, who lost one eye on January 28 during the uprising against then-President Hosni Mubarak, lost his other eye last Sunday on Mahmoud Street.
Both he and at least one other victim, Malek Mustapha, said they were blindsided by their shootings -- and, therefore, could not pinpoint the shooter or shooters. Yet they were able to recall the circumstances.
Harrara told CNN that he'd arrived in Tahrir Square around 3 p.m. Saturday "and joined the front lines in (the) street battle."
"Around 3 a.m. I was shot in the eye with a rubber bullet from about a distance of 7 to 10 meters (23 to 33 feet)," he said.
He lost his second eye, then fell to the ground "during one of many tear gas attacks."
Not bad.

I'm not cheering this guys actions but to be taking 'eye' shots and hitting is pretty impressive.  I wonder what type weapon he's using.

Remember the helicopter that made a precautionary landing a few days ago???


Remember this news release by ISAF?

2011-11-S-041
ISAF Joint Command - Afghanistan
For Immediate Release
KABUL, Afghanistan (Nov.  24, 2011) – An International Security Assistance Force helicopter made a precautionary landing in eastern Afghanistan Thursday.
ISAF is still in the process of assessing the circumstances to determine more facts; however, initial reporting indicates that there was no enemy activity in the area. All crew members have recovered with no reported injuries. When the assessment is completed, details will be released as appropriate.
Well your intrepid blogger wasn't too happy with the information provided so I shot an e-mail to the boys over there and got this response.
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: FOUO

Sanfu,

ISAF policy restricts the release of operational information; however,
we can say that the helicopter that made a precautionary landing was a
CH47 and was recovered by slingloading to a nearby ISAF base.  We have
no additional information to add.

IJC Press Desk.
Long story short. I'm not too happy, but I'll refrain from throwing rocks at ISAF.  Let me rephrase that and be specific.  I'd never throw stones at anyone below the rank of Colonel at ISAF.  Anything equal to and above that rank is fair game.

Lets play detective with the info provided.

*  The precautionary landing was made by a CH-47 in Eastern Afghanistan.
*  The 10th Combat Aviation Brigade (Task Force Falcon) is providing aviation assets in that area.
*  We can assume that they operated the helicopter that made the precautionary landing.
*  A number of US units are operating in the area...10th Mountain, 25th ID, 1st ID and several allied units including the French.
*  They stated in the press release that the CH-47 was slingloaded back to base so we can assume that a TRAP mission or whatever the Army calls it was performed.  That would seem to indicate some type of security force was on site while the helicopter was stripped.
*  Speaking of stripping the helicopter.  Unless they got CH-53E to do the slingloading then rotors, engines and any other heavy gear would have to be removed before making the flight.  Even with a CH-53E they might to have to a severe tear down job depending on terrain.

So....no information but we can make some pretty good guesses as to what occurred and since we have so little info coming out we have to make guesses.

Interesting though.  For such a non-incident they're playing their cards extremely close to the vest.  I wonder if we might not hear later on that this was indeed enemy action?

Friday, November 25, 2011

Wow! BlackFive went where I dared not go!

Those guys over at BlackFive have balls the size of bowling balls.

They went where I wouldn't go in polite conversations.  Sure, me and my buddies have talked about it in private but never in public.  Check out this post by them...
Posted By Grim • [November 25, 2011]
Instapundit links to a round of stories about the Euro crisis, and includes this comment:
“To predict the failure of the Euro was easy peasy: all that was needed was a slight familiarity with economics and the human race. To predict what comes next is much, much harder.” Yes.
I think I can make one prediction with relative safety.  The social-democracy policies that have ruined many European economies, and which currently threaten the stability of the whole European project, weren't paid for with deficiets alone.  They were also paid for by gutting European military budgets, relying on the umbrella of US protection.
You can't stand up a competent brigade overnight:  it takes a long time, as the examples of the ISF and ANSF demonstrate.  Non-Anglosphere NATO forces participated in these wars, so there is some small core of experience they can draw upon:  but by the same token, it should be clear to anyone who participated in either war that the non-Anglosphere NATO forces could not have performed other than in a support role.  Some of this is due to power-projection concerns such as heavy airlift capacity, but some of it is simply due to the weakness of these forces.
So, the prediction:  The already-common riots will evolve into insurgencies as the pinch becomes tighter, and the military forces of continental Europe are inadequate to stop them.  What comes after that?  An attempt at rapid re-militarization in Europe, with all the attendant chaos and violence that implies; pleas for a major US involvement to fill the gap while they try to stand up those forces.  What comes after that?  War, or nightfall.
I mean seriously!

Like I said, we've talked about it in whispers but this occupy wallstreet is the precursor to something nasty...and its global.

They're talking about riots turning nasty.  As in threatening democracy nasty.

IF and its a big if...food prices jump, we have periods of extremely---as in unbearably high oil prices---then you could see widespread unrest.  Not only in Europe but here in the US.

That my friends is why I have more than the FEMA recommended amount of food stored.  That my friends is why a person in New York would consider my collection of firearms an arsenal.

Are you ready in case of the worst and if not then I suggest you redo your Christmas shopping list to something a bit more practical than the latest consumer electronics.

Pic of the day and modest proposal. Ban black gear.

U.S. Army Soldiers with the Kandahar Provincial Reconstruction Team security force climb down from their positions during a site assessment of the Dowry Rud check dam in Spin Boldak district, Kandahar, Afghanistan, on Nov. 19, 2011. DoD photo by Senior Airman Sean Martin, U.S. Air Force. (Released)

Look at these Soldiers doing real work in Afghanistan.  Out on patrol and not at a major combat base but out and about doing Soldiers work...no civilian comparison here.  But notice one thing.  They're all wearing multicam which is doing its job quite well and whats busting it up?  Black rifles, black admin pouches, black nvg mounts etc....

Its past time that the US Army and US Marine Corps fix the black rifle problem.

Surely Duracoat or another manufacturer can come up with a fix that's durable enough to meet military standards.

Fix real problems!

Enough of the foolishness!

WTF is going on in the US Senate?

Read sections 1031 and 1032 of the Defense Authorization Bill.

Let me put it like this.  Both Right winger and Left wingers are up in arms and alarmed by the language.  I've said it before and I'll say it again.  McCain's use by date has expired (Levin's too).

Time to put that guy out to pasture!

The Senate is going to vote on whether Congress will give this president—and every future president — the power to order the military to pick up and imprison without charge or trial civilians anywhere in the world. Even Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) raised his concerns about the NDAA detention provisions during last night’s Republican debate. The power is so broad that even U.S. citizens could be swept up by the military and the military could be used far from any battlefield, even within the United States itself.
The worldwide indefinite detention without charge or trial provision is in S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act bill, which will be on the Senate floor on Monday. The bill was drafted in secret by Sens. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.) and passed in a closed-door committee meeting, without even a single hearing.
Full disclosure.

I'm in the preparedness community.  FEMA says have 7 days of food and water.  I have a bit more.  You believe in the Constitution.  I'm in love with the 2nd Amendment.  You say republican, I say Conservative.

Just sayin.

Is the Marine Corps becoming reactionary/risk averse?

Lt. Commander Timothy Ringo (left), aeromedical safety officer, and Marines with the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit receive instruction for proper underwater breathing during egress training Nov. 7. Approximately 200 Marines and sailors with Company L, 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit, made the Corps’ first egresses from a simulated amphibious assault vehicle, which was dunked in a Pendleton pool Nov. 7-11. The Marines embarked USS Makin Island, USS New Orleans and USS Pearl Harbor in San Diego Nov. 14 beginning a seven-month deployment to the western Pacific and Middle East regions.  Photo by Cpl. Chad Pulliam

Marines with the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit practice evacuating a sinking amphibious assault vehicle Nov. 7. Approximately 200 Marines and sailors with Company L, 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit, made the Corps’ first egresses from a simulated amphibious assault vehicle, which was dunked in a Pendleton pool Nov. 7-11. The Marines embarked USS Makin Island, USS New Orleans and USS Pearl Harbor in San Diego Nov. 14 beginning a seven-month deployment to the western Pacific and Middle East regions.  Photo by Cpl. Chad Pulliam
Sgt W. J. Rice was killed when his AAV sank at Camp Pendleton.  Lt. Commander Ringo then decided to dabble in the ground side of things and develop another egress training evolution.

Problem is this.  We've had this training for ever and a day.  The only difference is that it hasn't been done with a "designed" training aid.

My question is this.  Has the Marine Corps become risk averse?  Was there some type of finding that an experienced AAV crewman didn't know how to properly egress from his vehicle?  

I find that hard to believe.

I don't know what caused the tragedy that took Sgt Rice's life but something tells me that he didn't die because he didn't know how to properly escape from a sinking AAV.

And since this isn't the first time that a crewman has died in a vehicle incident then why have we decided that this type of training is necessary?

Why is an aeromedical safety officer dabbling in ground vehicle safety?  Doesn't he have enough work to do on the wing side?

Is this type of training even realistic?  Does it help?

I've been extremely impressed from the outside looking in at what the 11th MEU has been doing.  This smacks of political correctness so bad that it reeks.

Being in the military is inherently dangerous.  Developing training routines like this don't lessen the danger.

Besides, the more I look at this the more it looks like the dunk chamber that pilots go through for their water survival training.

The Marine Corps seems to be losing its way in small ways...

Polls being taken of the troops to decide on a uniform issue and then ignoring the polls (rolled sleeves vs. sleeves down).  Unique weapons buys (IAR).  Buying gear items year after year and not getting it right (boots, ruck sacks, holster).  Ditching useful uniform items and instead buying boutique, one use specific items instead (new PT uniform).

And now this.

I'm not impressed.