Wednesday, March 16, 2016

ST Kinetics ACV offering was more expensive but more capable than the General Dynamics version.

via Defense News.
The Government Accountability Office has denied General Dynamics Land Systems' protest of the Marine Corps’ decision to award contracts to both BAE Systems and SAIC to build prototype Amphibious Combat Vehicles.

GDLS decided to file a protest in December after contracts were awarded in November. GDLS took issue with the Marines' evaluation of SAIC’s higher-rated, higher-priced proposal over its lower-rated, lower-priced proposal, according to GAO.

“GAO concluded that the Marine Corps’ evaluation of the General Dynamics proposal was reasonable and consistent with the evaluation scheme identified in the solicitation. GAO also concluded that the decision to select SAIC’s higher-rated, but higher-priced proposal was within the agency’s discretion when conducting a best value procurement,” a statement from the office reads.

Lockheed Martin and Michigan-based Advanced Defense Vehicle Systems were also in the running to build the ACV.

The total value of the contract with all options exercised is about $1.2 billion. BAE’s contract is for $103.8 million, while SAIC’s is for $121.5 million. Each company will build 16 eight-wheeled vehicles to be tested over the next two years to replace the Marine Corps’ Vietnam-era amphibious assault vehicle. The service will then pick a winner in 2018 to deliver 204 vehicles by 2020.
Interesting.  BAE is hardly mentioned and it seems like General Dynamics aimed all its fire at ST Kinetics.

I thought this would be a low price blow out and obviously GD did too.  Instead the USMC bit on the ST Kinetics offering as higher priced but higher rated offering.  So many questions, so few answers and the defense media doesn't know enough to ask the right stuff. This is frustrating.  Are they merging the ACV 1.1 and 1.2?  The cocktail party defense media doesn't have a clue and only want a fresh Manhattan and a look down a low cut dress that's nicely filled.

No comments :

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.