Thursday, April 16, 2020

Did the Marine Corps Just Commit Suicide?

via Traditional Right.
Unfortunately, the mistakes here cut far deeper than fewer or more units of this or that. The proposed changes include three strategic errors, at least two of which are sufficient alone to put the Marine Corps’ continued existence in peril. They are:


Re-aligning the Corps to the NDS, which is to say focusing on war with China. We are not going to fight a war with China, because China is a nuclear power. Nuclear powers do not fight each other conventionally because the risk of escalation to nuclear war is too great. The whole NDS is a work of fiction, designed to justify patterns and levels of defense spending that flow out of the Cold War or in some cases (especially the Navy) World War II (a cynic might say all our services have become clubs for World War II reenactors). Worse still, General Berger’s changes build a fiction inside a fiction, namely that when we fight China the Marine Corps’ mission will be taking Chinese-held islands, presumably in the South China Sea. In the war with Japan, Marines took Japanese-held islands to create a chain leading to air bases that put us in bombing range of Japan. The islands now held by China, except Hainan, have no strategic significance. In World War II, we bypassed such islands (thereby undermining Japan’s strategy). Even Hainan is significant only as the base for the South China fleet. Fleets are mobile. If we took Hainan, it would simply sail north. What all this adds up to is re-configuring the Marine Corps for a campaign that makes no sense in a war that will not happen. That great blunder puts the Corp’s existence in peril.



So does a second blunder: focusing on “hi-tech” war built around long-range fires. The Marine Corps survived the 20th century because it offered capabilities the other services did not. The U.S. military already has a vast surplus of long-range fires, courtesy of the Navy and the Air Force. Now, with these changes, the Corps will define its capability as adding a pea-shooter to a broadside of 16-inch guns. Even if we take our fictitious scenario as real, the Chinese would not even notice the Marine Corps was involved. Becoming like the other services, a strategic blunder the Marine Corp began making in the mid-1990s and will now carry forward aggressively, means we won’t need a Marine Corps any more, except perhaps a battalion of embassy guards.

A third strategic blunder will probably not be noticed outside the Marine Corps but it will nonetheless reduce the value of what the Corps offers the nation. While the Commandant references maneuver warfare with regard to dispersing amphibious forces, a move that has merit, focusing on trading long-range fires with any opponent marks a return to a firepower/attrition understanding of war. In effect, it says future war will be a contest between trebuchets flinging pianos at each other. If we look around the world, that is not where war is going. In almost every case, state armed services that have vast superiority in long-range fires over their Fourth Generation opponents are losing, including us in Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan. Doctrinally, the Commandant’s vision faces backwards.
Then this.

.....let the other services make the blunder of re-shaping themselves to accord with the fictional NDS and go instead where war is going, to become the nation’s force of choice for Fourth Generation war overseas. Just as the other services neglected amphibious warfare during the 1920s and ‘30s and the Marine Corps of that time created a unique capability the country ended up needing, so it can do the same now with 4GW. It need not follow the other lemmings over a cliff.
Here. 

The answer?

Yes.  The Marine Corps is committing suicide.

His solution?  Partially right.  10% chance of a direct confrontation with China. More likely is a fight with terrorists, Chinese proxies and rogue nations.

The USMC is gearing up for the wrong fight with the wrong force structure with the wrong equipment.

Reinforce the MEU by adding a fourth ship.  Go in the opposite direction and mech up.  The Wing is already reinforced but the Ground Combat Element has been neglected for over two decades.  Beef it up.  Increase cannons, get a decent 120mm mortar.  Get mobile on the ground and in the air (air is already covered).

Be prepared to fight hybrid terror forces and rogue nations with advanced weapons. 

Do all of the above and fighting the Chinese will be cake...if that fight comes in the next 20 - 30 years.

The AH-64 is without a doubt the most successful attack helicopter (by number of sales) flying today...

Commander Bond, RN heads for the exit...

Ya know what's weird?  Became a fan of this guy just by his telling the story of his unit on Twitter.  Really became a bigger fan of Royal Navy rotary aviation because of his Twitter.

Social media...A powerful tool to inform and educate for the military if used properly.

Michigan protests should not surprise us -- There are real risks from aggressive, prolonged lockdowns

via Fox Business.
Wednesday’s protests in Michigan show that draconian state lockdown orders – if allowed to continue too long – threaten the voluntary law-abiding character of the American people.

State governors, who truly control whether the economy stays open or shut, must better explain their reasons for their trade-offs between slowing the spread of the coronavirus pandemic versus throwing millions out of work and destroying billions in economic activity.

If their people disagree, these leaders risk sparking civil disobedience that will undermine their political and legal systems.
Here. 

This is the danger that I've feebly tried to warn about.

It is TOTALLY against the American character for FREE MEN & WOMEN to be told that they can't leave their homes.

It is TOTALLY against the American character for FREE MEN & WOMEN to be told that they can't earn a living and provide for their families.

I can't speak for other nations.  Everyone has their own "national character".  I'm not here to judge (although I find it remarkable that so many foreigners feel the right to judge our beliefs...and will get their pussy hairs curled into knots when you shine a spotlight on their nations) just explain.

Governors might be reviling in the power that they're experiencing.  Certain fellow travelers might actually believe that we should obey without question.

I'm just here to tell you that we need  a better explanation than we're getting.

Many discount the idea that the cure could be worse than the disease but let's think about what we've been told.

This thing will without a doubt comeback in the fall.

We will NOT be able to get back to normal until a vaccine is developed which will take at least a year to eighteen months.

That's madness to even consider continuing these draconian efforts for even half that long.

The answer to this drama is painful but better than the closing of this economy.

The vulnerable must be separated from the rest of the population.

Instead of putting our entire nation in a protective bubble we must put the vulnerable under these restrictions with the idea that they're adults and if they violate the guidelines they'll risk death.

To be blunt?  We must not sacrifice the nation for the weak and infirm.

Is that cold hearted?

Perhaps.

But its the only way.

As this thing drags on we're risking our democracy.  We're risking social unrest.  We're risking our nation.

Side note.  Spare me the talk about how the medical staff is the only ones taking risks.  I face real deal murders, drug dealers, rapists, thieves, child molesters etc...It's part of the job.  It's what I signed up for.  I deal.  Additionally people at fast food joints, grocery stores, truck drivers, delivery drivers etc...are facing risks too.  But we've artificially turned off our economy. The longer its closed the longer the recovery.

Side note 1.  Protest also took place in North Carolina and are planned for today...

Belarus preps new MRAPs for their national parade...



The Pandemic Won’t Make China the World’s Leader

via Foreign Affairs.
China’s initial propaganda offensive was stunningly aggressive, but it now appears clumsy and unlikely to work. The Chinese Communist Party’s narrative is limited by the simple fact that too many people know about the outbreak’s origins in Wuhan and Beijing’s bungled initial response—in particular, its efforts to suppress information and silence many of the doctors who first warned of the emergence of a dangerous new virus. In the face of calls for greater transparency, Beijing ejected American journalists working for The New York Times, The Washington Post, and The Wall Street Journal. On Twitter, a spokesperson for China’s foreign ministry accused the U.S. military of bringing the coronavirus to Wuhan. Although Beijing has backed away from this reprehensible claim in recent weeks, its approach has a whiff of desperation, which hints at Beijing’s own insecurity about the mishandling of the outbreak.

Global skepticism extends, with good reason, to China’s coronavirus statistics. Indeed, while China’s official tally of new COVID-19 cases indicates effective containment (by March 19, the number of new local infections had fallen to near zero), some in China fear that the central government has simply stopped reporting all the test results in order to keep its official count low and to maintain the narrative that it has won the war against the virus; it wouldn’t be the first time Beijing has suppressed unfavorable data.

Some leaders, of course, are embracing Beijing’s narrative and applauding its methods in combating the outbreak—including officials in Cambodia, Iran, Pakistan, and Serbia. But few of these governments have been newly persuaded by recent Chinese messaging; they have a long record of accepting Chinese political narratives and economic assistance, often at the service of their own power at home. Indeed, some early recipients in Europe of Chinese-made testing kits and protective equipment rejected them as substandard. Just this week, Finland’s prime minister fired the head of the country's emergency supply agency for spending millions of euros on defective Chinese facemasks.

Meanwhile, other leaders are already pushing back against China’s attempt to rewrite the global narrative about its COVID-19 response. European Union High Representative for Foreign Affairs Josep Borrell openly criticized Chinese efforts as “a struggle for influence through spinning and the ‘politics of generosity.’” Leaders in Brazil and India, who are facing challenges at home, have quickly turned to criticizing China and eschewing its aid. In Africa, public attention has been riveted by stories of widespread racism against African expats in southern China. And even before the pandemic started, Beijing faced a large trust deficit among its Asian neighbors. A survey of public opinion in six Asian countries, conducted by the Pew Research Center between May and October 2019, and published in late February, found significantly higher percentages of people held favorable views of the United States when compared with China.

In pushing its narrative of triumph against the coronavirus, Beijing’s approach will be compared not only to that of the United States but also to the impressive actions of many Asian countries, including several democracies. Beijing failed badly at first—due to a striking and predictable lack of transparency—and Washington is failing now. But democratic South Korea and Taiwan have performed better than both. South Korea’s impressive testing and contact-tracing regime and Taiwan’s early detection and containment efforts reflect both their governance choices and their ability to learn from past experience with pandemics. Citizens and governments looking for models are more likely to choose those democratic successes than China’s vaunted authoritarian alternative and draconian containment efforts—the real costs of which remain unknown.

Moreover, China’s economy can’t ride to the rescue as it did during the global financial crisis. Although there is a partial uptick on the supply side as Chinese factories reopen, the demand side drivers for China’s growth are in real trouble. China’s economy is too dependent on external demand from the United States and Europe to become the sole savior of the global economy. The 12 countries hardest hit by the virus today account for about 40 percent of China’s exports. Many of these countries are also China’s top suppliers of intermediate goods. China’s economy will not be able to return to its prior growth trajectory of some five to six percent annually until the economies of the United States and the European Union recover, as well. Chinese policymakers will have to hold back some of their domestic stimulus efforts until that happens, knowing such stimulus will have a limited impact if global demand is down. Funding another credit-fueled stimulus as the Chinese did in 2008–9 is off the table due to China’s high overall debt levels and the real risk of triggering a collapse of its financial system.

I'm in the process of reassessing our military situation with regard to China.  Both forces I believe will be in a hurt locker for the next 10 years with a small but surprisingly significant advantage to the US side.

Why?

Because we use military spending as part of our stimulus spending.

In other words.  China just squandered its ability to achieve military supremacy in the 2030's.

You'll see defense hawks in the US yield on social spending (which will inevitably come) in return for increased defense budgets.

The terrible 2020's might be off the table...at least for now.

Make no mistake.

We're setting ourselves up for HELLACIOUS inflation once this disaster is over.  But the defense industrial complex got about a 5 year reprieve...maybe longer if this thing comes back in the winter.

A wrecked worldwide economy over the next 5 years coupled with increased spending in the US to lift the economy which will equal increased defense/social spending will give the DoD a chance to get its house in order ONCE AGAIN.

If they're smart we can use this tragedy to put them in a cage.

A virus (that I believe escaped from a lab...but I'll wait till the Pentagon verifies that before I chest thump) might have altered the course of the Chinese nation.


31st Marine Expeditionary Unit and service members with the Japanese Ground Self-Defense Force’s Amphibious Rapid Deployment Brigade conduct a bilateral small-boat raid followed by High-Mobility Artillery Rocket System insert and simulated shot




Open Comment Post. 16 Apr 2020









In the early hours of December 31th 2019, Taiwan CDC Dep. Director and other staff spotted a post on #PTT (Taiwan Reddit) talking about SARS-like cases in Wuhan



Add this to your stack of information on the origins of the coronavirus and the timeline of the response to it.

Taiwan was effective in their response because they (apparently) properly utilized OPEN SOURCE information.

More to come.

The Lion of Fallujah

Wednesday, April 15, 2020

Pic of the day. CMV-22B with C-2A


Germany doing a slow motion re-opening...





Europe is accepting the truth.

You can't keep the economy closed as long as we have without the cure being worse than the disease.

The same will happen in the US.  Despite many of those on this blog that would sacrifice everything because of fear of the virus, the reality is stark.

If we stay closed more people will die from that than will from this disease. As shocking as that is, its a fact.

Pakistani Navy operating a new sub for their SEAL units...

Hey if you guys don't know, Sutton is REALLY worth a follow (on Twitter).  I'm not really into subs but he is and the work going on around the world will put your head on spin drive.

Ukrainian AN-178 looks good...

I hope this project works out for them.  Its the right size to compete effectively against the C-130/A-400 (I think) and if the price point is right it should be a winner.

For all their struggles this could be the project that's finally a win for the Ukrainians.

Various types of Russian turrets and remotely controlled weapon stations for IFV/APC/ADS



World Health Organization coronavirus response timeline...


Yeah.

The World Health Organization did it "right"?!

Nope.

The WHO led the world down a rabbit hole and their current leader committed a crime against humanity because he's in the pocket of the Chinese.

The main problem?  They downplayed Human to Human Transmission.  That alone slowed the response.  That is the problem.  That is the sin.

Open Comment Post. 15 Apr 2020


USS America (LHA 6) Conducts Night Flight Operations...Photos by Petty Officer 1st Class Rufus Hucks











Sailors and Marines Offload EMF From USNS DAHL....Photos by Petty Officer 1st Class Nathan Carpenter

Caption to photos...
NAVAL BASE GUAM (April 11, 2020) U.S. Marine Lance Cpl. Jacob Blanton, assigned to Combat Logistics Regiment 3 (CLR 3), directs movement of an AAV-P7/A1 amphibious assault vehicle during an operation to offload equipment for an Expeditionary Medical Facility (EMF) from Watson-class vehicle cargo ship USNS Dahl (T-AKR-312). The EMF will provide expanded medical capabilities in support of DoD’s COVID-19 response and will enable forces to be postured to support Guam and the region if a Defense Support of Civil Authorities mission is requested. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Nathan Carpenter/Released)
Note.  They're not being very subtle are they?  It's obvious that Guam will be the "treatment" area for the Pacific fleet for sailors that come down with the Coronavirus.  Expect no more announcements of sick crews or sailors/Marines aboard ship getting sick.  At least from the Navy/Marines.  If news gets out it will be via Red Cross messages being released from the families.

While not an elegant solution it is much better than a publicity seeking Captain jeopardizing our readiness by crying to the media.


















Blast from the past. WW1 one-man tank, used to move wire-cutters close to enemy lines.