Thursday, March 29, 2012
Internally Transportable Vehicle vs. Arctic Cat
Arctic Cat Stats
DIMENSIONS
Overall Length (in./cm) 129/327.7
Overall Width (in./cm) 60/152.4
Overall Height (in./cm) 79/200.6
Wheelbase (in./cm) 85/215.9
Ground Clearance (in./cm) 10/25.4
Dry Weight (lbs./kg) 1363/619.55
Overall Length (in./cm) 129/327.7
Overall Width (in./cm) 60/152.4
Overall Height (in./cm) 79/200.6
Wheelbase (in./cm) 85/215.9
Ground Clearance (in./cm) 10/25.4
Dry Weight (lbs./kg) 1363/619.55
TOWING/HAULING
Rear Box Storage Capacity
(lbs./kg)
1000/454.5
Towing Capacity (lbs./kg) 1500/680.4
Underhood/Side Storage
Capacity (lbs./kg)
25/11.34 — NA
Rear Box Storage Capacity
(lbs./kg)
1000/454.5
Towing Capacity (lbs./kg) 1500/680.4
Underhood/Side Storage
Capacity (lbs./kg)
25/11.34 — NA
ENGINE
Displacement (cc) 695
Engine Type SOHC, 4-stroke, 4-valve w/EFI
Bore & Stroke (mm) 102x85
Cooling System Liquid with fan
Fuel Capacity (gal./liters) 8.2/31
Alternator Capacity (amps) 25
Speedometer Analog
Odometer Digital
Displacement (cc) 695
Engine Type SOHC, 4-stroke, 4-valve w/EFI
Bore & Stroke (mm) 102x85
Cooling System Liquid with fan
Fuel Capacity (gal./liters) 8.2/31
Alternator Capacity (amps) 25
Speedometer Analog
Odometer Digital
ITV Stats
Weight | curb 1,500 kg (3,300 lb) MGW: 3,800 kg (8,400 lb) |
---|---|
Length | 4.080 m (160.6 in) |
Width | 1.512 m (59.5 in) |
Height | 1.940 m (76.4 in) reducible to 1.40 m (55 in) |
Crew | 1 |
Engine | diesel |
Payload capacity | 900 kg (2,000 lb) cross country |
Suspension | 4x4 |
Fuel capacity | 75 litres (20 US gal) fuel: diesel/JP MPG: 17 |
Speed | max 105 km/h (65 mph) |
Steering system | four wheel |
Simple question.
With much cheaper vehicles available that provided the same level of protection (none)...that are capable of towing the exact same mortar system around...that cost MUCH MUCH MUCH less (yes I'm repeating myself...the ITV cost over
How did we end up with the ITV?
Why isn't someone in jail?
And are we still buying these?
SIDENOTE:
Hey Marines, if you happen to be in the UK or training with Royal Marines do yourselves and the USMC a favor and refer to this vehicle as the ITV and NOT the Growler. Informational video follows.
Too Damn Little. Too Fucking Late.
via Fox News.
Leadership just doesn't get it.
Troops made this adjustment already. Interior perimeters are standard and have been for awhile.
Wow.U.S. troops in Afghanistan now have far-reaching new protections against rogue killers among their Afghan allies, including assigned "guardian angels," fellow troops who will watch over them as they sleep.Marine Gen. John Allen, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, ordered the added protections in recent weeks to guard against insider threats, according to a senior military official. They come in the wake of 16 attacks on U.S. and coalition forces by Afghans that now represent nearly one-fifth of all combat deaths this year.Some of the changes have been subtle, others less so.In several Afghan ministries, Americans are now allowed to carry weapons. And they have been instructed to rearrange their office desks there to face the door, so they can see who is coming in, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe the orders.Two U.S. military officers working in the Afghan Interior Ministry, one of the most heavily guarded ministry buildings in Kabul, were gunned down at their desks on Feb. 25. While Allen did not detail the new measures in a briefing earlier this week, he acknowledged that changes had been made."We have taken steps necessary on our side to protect ourselves with respect to, in fact, sleeping arrangements, internal defenses associated with those small bases in which we operate," Allen said, adding that now someone is "always overwatching our forces."
Leadership just doesn't get it.
Troops made this adjustment already. Interior perimeters are standard and have been for awhile.
The risk is not when you're sleeping but when you're having to work side by side...when you're on patrol...teaching and leading ....AFGHANS.
It must be great to order your men to do what they're already doing.
Panetta likes big deck amphibs...
via the Patch.com
The guy knows a bit about the utility of Marines and the necessity of amphibs.
But....words are cheap. Actions speak much louder. Time to see if his actions match his word. Military and Civilian leadership in the DoD has been beyond piss poor. I'm at the point where if you have a star on your uniform you're not to be trusted.
“The department will continue to prioritize big deck amphibious assault ships such as the Peleliu because of the flexibility they provide commanders to move Marines and supplies ashore,” Little said.Well ain't that something.
The Peleliu has provided critical support to U.S. Central Command and to Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan, he said.
“In November 2001, the Peleliu conducted the deepest insertion of ground forces in Marine Corps history to launch the first Marines into Afghanistan,” Little said. “On its most recent deployment, in August 2010, the Peleliu provided relief to victims of flooding in Pakistan.”
The guy knows a bit about the utility of Marines and the necessity of amphibs.
But....words are cheap. Actions speak much louder. Time to see if his actions match his word. Military and Civilian leadership in the DoD has been beyond piss poor. I'm at the point where if you have a star on your uniform you're not to be trusted.
Blast from the past...Kitty Hawk as a Special Ops carrier.
Thanks for the article Joe.
The US military has conducted some real life "experiments" with carriers. The 10th Mountain Division conducted a heliborne assault during Operation Uphold Democracy and deployed 54 helicopters along with 2000 troops.
An acceptable performance under adhoc conditions...a situation that really wasn't called for but the Army (US inter service politics) had to get its boys into action. Interestingly enough, they haven't sought to do it again. Being an outsider looking in I would bet body parts that it had to do a bit with troop berthing, a bit with helo maintenance and a realization that Army helicopters are not marinized and are not suited to operating at sea. I bet the bird bath got a workout on that cruise.
Regardless, SOCOM is still trying to get a big deck ship and have laid there eyes on a retiring amphib to make there dreams come true of being a full fledged service unto itself.
There first attempt is the subject of the article that Joe sent. via the LA Times.
Specially trained forces and elite light infantry units are expected to be instrumental in the effort to locate and strike Saudi-born extremist Osama bin Laden and his Al Qaeda terror network. Some units have already been reported deployed to the region, and others are believed to be on their way.Read the whole thing for yourself, but I continue to think that ideas like this are nothing but bad ideas. Even lacking their attack aircraft, carriers are just not designed to carry troops.
The dispatch of the half-empty Kitty Hawk "is a little unusual, but this war is a little unusual too," said a defense official who asked to remain unidentified.
Another official noted, however, that aircraft carriers were used for a similar purpose in the 1994 U.S. military intervention in Haiti. In that operation, one carrier transported members of the Army's 10th Mountain Division, and a second carried special operations personnel.
The Kitty Hawk is the fourth carrier heading to, or already in, the region, marking the largest concentration of carrier force since the Persian Gulf War 10 years ago.
Based in Yokosuka, Japan, the Kitty Hawk usually carries about half support aircraft and half attack planes. The attack planes are F-14 Tomcats and F/A-18 Hornets; the support aircraft include surveillance planes.
Officials said they left a mix of attack and support planes on the carrier.
Military officials stressed that even without the Kitty Hawk, they had more than enough planes for any strike mission the United States was likely to order soon.
Given the limited number of targets in Afghanistan, and the presence of more than 200 U.S. planes in the region, "it's hard to imagine what we'd need more planes for," said a defense official. "What's the target?"
The Kitty Hawk, which is part of the U.S. 7th Fleet, had recently returned from nine days of exercises in the deep waters off Japan. Some observers speculated that the trip may have been intended to allow sailors and fighter pilots time to refresh their skills before they joined the anti-terrorist operation.
Of the 12 U.S. aircraft carriers, it is the only one permanently deployed outside U.S. territory, and its departure leaves East Asia without an American carrier.
A Navy spokesman said that the Kitty Hawk's official mission was to "support efforts to identify, locate and hold accountable terrorists and those who support and harbor them."
They'll keep trying and they'll keep failing.
What SOCOM really wants (and they just might get it) is a big deck LHA/LHD. It goes against what they're suppose to be...what they're suppose to do.
But they insist on pushing the idea and too many fanboys will back it instead of calling them on it.
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Questionable decision making.
via Navy Times.
Absolutely craven.
No integrity.
No courage.
No guts. All to please some Congress Critters.
Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jon Greenert has decided to reverse the looming deactivation of one of the Navy’s 10 carrier air wings, citing “congressional sensitivity” about reducing the service’s force structure.Absolutely spineless.
In a March 20 memo, Greenert said Naval Air Station Lemoore, Calif.-based Carrier Air Wing 14 will not be deactivated as previously planned. CVW-14 is attached to the aircraft carrier Ronald Reagan, which is currently dry-docked at Naval Base Kitsap, Wash., for scheduled maintenance. A CVW includes around 2,000 sailors; Greenert’s decision creates more job security for those positions.
“Effective immediately, deactivation of CVW-14 is disapproved. Restore CVW-14 to an operational status,” the CNO’s memo said.
Greenert’s decision, however, expires in a year unless a new plan takes its place.
The Navy had planned to deactivate a carrier air wing and its squadrons in its fiscal 2012 budget to help meet required cuts in defense spending in last year’s Budget Control Act, cutting the number of carrier air wings from 10 to nine. But Deputy Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter later directed the Navy to make funds and manpower available for 10 wings.
Greenert’s memo said the plan was “put on hold by the Office of Legislative Affairs due to congressional sensitivity on pending Navy force structure reductions.”
Absolutely craven.
No integrity.
No courage.
No guts. All to please some Congress Critters.
Marine Assault Amphibian Battalion preps for Africa Partnership 2012
All photos by Sgt. Bryan Peterson
NOTE*
With an AAV Battalion now going to Africa Partnership 2012, the US Marine Corps is basically setting up a SPMAGTF with serious combat capability.
Think about it like this. If we look at the Africa Partnership as a fully joint operation then you probably have a Special Forces Battalion, an Air Force squadron with F-15E's...a full MEU off shore and unknown number of US Army Rangers, 160th aircraft/personnel, MARSOC and British/French/Dutch/Spanish/Italian Special Forces running all over that continent.
I don't know exactly whats going on there...but something big is brewing...too many personnel moving there at the same time for it to be strictly training.
I wish it was this clean and easy...
I love these vids...
The good guys always win and its always clean and easy.
Reality is a bitch.
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)