Tuesday, December 27, 2016

Two more years to defeat ISIS? Time to fire some generals!

Thanks to William for the link!

via Daily Beast
The general commanding coalition forces in Iraq predicts it will take two years of hard work to clear the so-called Islamic State from its twin capitals of Mosul and Raqqa, and then to burn out the remnants that will likely flee to the vast empty desert between Syria and Iraq.
In a Christmas Day sit-down with The Daily Beast at his headquarters, Lt. Gen. Stephen Townsend would not put specific timelines on the battle. But he mapped out a grinding campaign that he thinks is going slowly but as well as can be expected, considering how much time ISIS had to prepare and how brutal its fighters are willing to be.

“A fighter walking out of a building will hold a child over his head so we can see him through ISR until he reaches another building,” he said, using the military acronym for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance.


The grim battle against ISIS is taking place against a backdrop of continuing sectarian tension in Iraq, which could get worse if newly empowered militia groups let their influence go to their heads. A new Iraqi law that goes into force this week makes militia forces here legal. Such groups—especially Iranian backed Shiite armed forces—have been accused of war crimes against Iraq’s Sunni minority. The U.S. has ordinarily eyed these units warily.

But Townsend, in an unusual statement for an American commander, said these militias been been “remarkably disciplined” allies since he arrived. That assessment marks a stark contrast with his previous tours, when deadly Iranian-manufactured bombs almost hit his vehicle, and took the lives of many of his troops.

The coalition footprint is much smaller than the 100,000-plus of Townsend’s previous tours in Iraq—somewhere south of 10,000 when troops on short term duty are added to the count. At the headquarters compound, soldiers were taking a brief break from work on Christmas to stage a spoon relay race in a hallway. One soldier dressed as Santa cheered competitors to the finish line, while those watching swigged nonalcoholic cider for some semblance of Christmas cheer.

The headquarters is tucked inside the sprawling “Green Zone” which the U.S. used to run, now turned over to Iraqi control. The Americans feel very much like visitors. U.S. authority extends to the gate of the compound—all outside is done with Iraqi government permission. Townsend’s team is very aware they are there to help, not to lead.
JESUS!  Our way of war needs to be totally revamped.  Two MORE years to destroy a force that numbers less than 50K?  Allowing our supposed allies to legalize death squads so that the sectarian violence will continue...even those on the sidelines will eventually pick up arms if the govt forces are seen as being cold blooded murders!  A sprawling Green Zone which almost guarantees that we will be committed to supporting a faction in the sectarian violence...which means we've taken sides...also means that we're guaranteeing a generational conflict?

Its past time to fire this generation of generals.

I don't know how it happened but somehow, someway they've made Vietnam look like a well run military operation.

Is it even possible to win there anymore?

Alien: Covenant | Official Trailer



Big screen Sci-Fi is in trouble.

Sorry but when I can look at trailers of the new Star Wars flicks and see variations on the theme of the original then its time for Lucas to step aside and let some fresh blood in.

Same goes for the Alien franchise.  I means seriously!  This looks like a poor mix of Alien and Aliens!  Did I catch a hint of that controversial "alien" rape from the first film in this trailer?

Its past time for the studios to start looking for new material instead of giving us rehashed former block busters.

So the Ford Police Package INCLUDES ballistic protection?

 
http://tacticalsquad.tumblr.com/post/155031191738
 

I always thought the idea of hiding behind the doors of police cars by LEO's to be one of the most batshit crazy things I've seen.

Concealment maybe but cover?  Nope.  My steel core AK rounds would slice thru that like butter.

Looks like I was wrong.

Who knew but it appears that the Ford Police Package (which seems to be the nationwide standard) has ballistic protection and is practically proof against AK, AR and almost all handgun rounds.

Amazing.

Open Comment Post. Dec. 27, 2016


Sunday, December 25, 2016

Saturday, December 24, 2016

Exactly how Trump can end the F35 and save $15 billion or more per year for 30-50 years while improving US military capability

Thanks to Don for the link!


via Next Big Future.
Last month, Pentagon negotiations gave Lockheed a $6.1 billion take-it-or-leave-it deal for 57 F-35s. Lockheed make no secret that it was unhappy with the deal and has until February to accept or reject it.
Nextbigfuture prefers that the F-35s get cancelled and the Advanced Hornet option is pursued.

The general in charge of the F35 project, Lt. Gen. Chris Bogdan, has floated other ways to reduce the cost of each jet, including injecting more competition within the plane’s sprawling supply chain, which touches 45 states, and buying planes in bulk.
“If you have a single source supplier of a particular component on this airplane right now and you’re not sure if that person can build you 3,000 airplanes worth of that, you probably might want to open up a second source,” he said. “Once you open up a second source, now you have natural competition. We should explore some of that.”
The F-35 will not be fully battle ready to fight a diverse range of missions until the end of the decade (or even later). As for the F/A-18, its design is stable and Boeing can build them quickly. And Boeing has marketed an “advanced Super Hornet” with high-tech equipment somewhat comparable to the F-35.
Functioning and lower cost F18s would make a stronger US military from now to 2022 at least. I am not convinced the F35s would be better even after the effort to get them capable of basic missions.
Investing some of the savings into accelerated development of the F/A-XX and new long-range unmanned strike platforms could see new military capability by 2025-2030 instead of 2035-2045.
THIS IS A MUST READ ARTICLE (HERE)!  Don't embarrass yourself and try and commit before you've taken a few minutes to read the whole thing!

Oh and I agree in total with them! 

China Boasts Its J-31 Can 'Take Down' The F-35

Thanks to Don for the link!

via CSMonitor.
BEIJING — China's new stealth fighter could certainly "take down" its opponent in the sky, the president of China's top aircraft maker said on Tuesday, referring to its U.S.-made counterpart.
Lin Zuoming, president of Aviation Industry Corp of China (Avic), which developed the J-31 stealth fighter, made the remarks in an interview on state broadcaster China Central Television (CCTV).
"When it takes to the sky, it can definitely take it down," he said, in a reference to the U.S.-made F-35. "That's a certainty."
Then this...
China hopes the J-31 will compete with the U.S.-made F-35 stealth aircraft as China works to strengthen its standing as an arms producer, according to China military watchers and state media reports.
"Experts predict that the J-31 will make rapid inroads in the international market in the future, and will undoubtedly steal the limelight from the F-35," the ruling Communist Party's People's Daily reported on its website in August 2013.
It said the aircraft would be particularly attractive to countries that are cut off from U.S. arms exports.
The J-31 is about the same size as the F-35, the U.S. Department of Defense said in a report this year.
Stealth aircraft are key for China's air force to evolve from a mostly territorial air force to developing the ability to carry out both offensive and defensive operations, the Pentagon said in the report about developments in China's military.
Story here!

What happens if stealth is no longer the exclusive property of the US and its allies?  What happens if the vaunted "see first, shoot first" meme no longer applies?  What happens if electronic warfare becomes the key to kingdom along with traditional fighter metrics?

What if the Chinese are right and the J-31 CAN COMPETE with the F-35?

 Remember this sad fact.  The Chinese have the F-35 plans.

https://news.vice.com/article/man-who-sold-f-35-secrets-to-china-pleads-guilty

http://freebeacon.com/national-security/china-hacked-f22-f35-jet-secrets/

http://freebeacon.com/national-security/nsa-details-chinese-cyber-theft-of-f-35-military-secrets/

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/snowden-chinese-hackers-stole-f-35-fighter-jet-blueprints-article-1.2084888

http://breakingdefense.com/2013/06/top-official-admits-f-35-stealth-fighter-secrets-stolen/

The fanboys don't want to admit it but the truth is staring us in the face.  The Chinese have product improved the F-35.  Stealth is out of the bottle.  Any advantage that the F-35 would give is long gone.

I don't think the J-31 beating the F-35 is a boast...I think its a fact.

Sidenote.  Yes the article is from 2014 but you guys (especially the F-16.net trolls) need to be reminded of these things!

More pics of damaged Turkish Leopard 2A4's.

Thanks to Darkness 99 for the pics.



That first pic is telling.  That armor failed and the vehicle burned.  Don't know about the second pic.  The top panel is off and the ammo is exposed.  What hit these tanks?

Regardless its two more Turkish Leopard 2A4's headed to the repair depot if they haven't been captured by ISIS.

That brings up another question.  Why aren't the Turks making an effort to deny these tanks to the enemy?  I would have thought that F-16 strikes would be launched to destroy any vehicle captured by ISIS but we haven't seen that.

Turkish armored vehicle losses in Syria.

via Bmachina Tumblr Page.


Just wow.

The battle for Mosul goes badly and the Iraqi "Gold" Division may cease to exist.

ERBIL, Kurdistan Region—The Iraqi force tasked with liberating the city of Mosul from ISIS is overstretched, suffered great loss and exhausted and is putting a few hundred new recruits through a crash course for battle. That is the elite Golden Division.

The defeat of ISIS and its expulsion from the second largest city was entrusted to this force of 10,000 trained soldiers from Iraq’s different ethnic backgrounds. And they have been on the forefront since the offensive was launched on October 17.

The operation to retake this city is getting tougher over time, hampering the liberation and increasing the number of casualties of the Golden Division.

Furthermore, the US Central Command (Centcom) argues that the current success achieved in the fight to liberate Mosul “has come at a terrible price, one that could have dire consequences for Iraq in the long run,” said quoted by Politico.

The Golden Division commanders warn that they may eventually liberate Mosul but with a little force left in the end.

“If the war continues this way, we will lose many of our fighters by the time we have liberated the left side of Mosul,” warned a commander with the said division.



However, Major General Maan Zaid, a key commander with the given division, allayed fears of a potential Golden Division destruction by the end of Mosul war. “There are no wars without casualties. The operation to liberate Mosul will surely cost lives,” he explained.


ISIS is using modern weapons in Mosul, such as the anti-tank missile known as Kornet which has severely afflicted the Iraqi army.

“ISIS is using powerful weapons in this war. But our casualties are less than reported,” Zaid added.

The Iraqi Prime Minister has said on a few occasions that they will liberate Mosul this year. However, Zaid said, “It is difficult to predict with precision when Mosul offensive will finish.”

Zaid also said that they have inflicted heavy losses on ISIS, “1000 ISIS militants have been killed on the front I lead alone.”

Some in the division doubt this number.

“This war is strange. Sometimes we regain control of a complete neighborhood without seeing an ISIS body. We haven’t seen more than 5 ISIS bodies in each of the neighborhoods we have liberated so far,” a Golden Division soldier told Rudaw on condition of anonymity.

“The more neighborhoods we liberate, the more encircled ISIS will get, the more car bombs and suicide bombers they will send, and the more intense they will fight. The war will, therefore, get tougher. Mosul offensive needs strong warriors,” said a Golden Division commander on condition of anonymity.

“Put simply, the Golden Division’s fight for Mosul could go down in history as one of the greatest victories of the Iraqi government—and its last,” warned Mark Perry in an article published by Politico, How Iraq’s Army Could Defeat ISIS in Mosul – But Lose Control of the Country.
If the above isn't worrying enough then check this out...
The United States 2nd Brigade Combat Team of the 101st Airborne Division is advising the Golden Division in its push into Mosul.
You don't send a Brigade Combat Team to advise a division.  You send a Special Forces Detachment.

Not only has SOCOM given up on the "advise" mission but our guys in the 101st are probably leading Iraqi forces in this fight.

The war continues and no one is paying attention.

Worse.  Current policy will probably see US troops trying to stitch back Iraq for the foreseeable future.  The Marine Corps might not wear desert cammies stateside but they most certainly will when they're spelling Army troops and taking over the mission outside Mosul.

Side Note.  Weren't we told just a few months ago that Mosul would shortly be liberated? 

Open Comment Post. Dec 24, 2016.

Strv 74

Top tanks. New information...new list!

There has been a raging debate on the blog about the rankings of the top tanks in the world.  Where did it come from?  The performance of Turkish Leopard 2's in Syria.  To be honest they've been getting their asses handed to them.  Why is this alarming when we've seen the Saudi's getting the same treatment in Yemen?  Because Turkey is a member of NATO, they're a quasi-European nation (some debate this but they're pushing for membership in the EU...and its still under consideration, not rejected outright...and in the past the US has supported its inclusion so they're Europe right?) and it can be assumed that they would get the same standard of tank that was sold to other European countries.

That means what we're seeing armor/protection wise is the real deal, not some detuned export model.

With that being said this is the new top tank list biased toward crew protection...


M1 Abrams.

This is the king of the beasts, undisputed champion and the tank that will most likely get its crew back alive.  No gimmicks here just good engineering that's been proven in the heat of battle.


T14 Armata.

Some will question its inclusion on the list and also its high ranking.  I feel it deserves it.  Encapsulating its crew in an armored bathtub?  Not exactly original thinking but they're the first to get the deed done.  Additionally we haven't seen a tank scare like this one since the old CIA reports on the USSR and how everyone was worried about the T-64.  Armor protection, massive main gun planned and a ground breaking potential on future battlefields justify this ranking.


Challenger 2.

This warhorse has seemingly been around forever (although its no older than the Abrams) but its like a former UFC champion.  It might be a bit long in the tooth but its still extremely dangerous.  The Brits have finally gotten around to doing upgrades on this beast which should serve it well.  Additionally when it has been under fire its performed at the top of the game, protecting its crews and bringing them back alive.


Merkava 4.

The entire Merkava program was built with crew protection in mind.  I have not been impressed with its recent performance though.  Its heavily armored with the added protection of having the engine in front but again its performance (and the way the Israeli's have used it) leaves alot to be desired.  Additionally they appear to embrace armored warfare and having alot of ready rounds to engage enemy tanks instead of placing a premium on crew protection if the worst happens.  Its a balancing act and tradeoffs are to be expected but I think the Merkava 4 emphasizes fighting in the Golan and in the plains against armored formations instead of the up close knife fights that it finds itself involved in on an almost daily basis.


Leopard 2A7.

Everyone is amazed by Teutonic engineering.  Everyone has looked at the Leopard family and thought that its what a tank should look like.  A big gun, fast, highly mobile, able to traverse broken ground at speed...so what if its armor isn't quite as thick as the others.  But armor does matter and its part of the iron triangle.  Leopard fanboys have a bit of glamorization of German military might in WW2.  Specifically its technical achievements.  I only wonder how much of that carried over into the design of the Leopard...especially the models up to 2A5?  I mean think about it!  The tank is almost perfect for a blitzkrieg but not really for a defense from the USSR's tank horde everyone feared in the past.  Its not a bad tank, just not a top tank.

Honorable Mentions?

Basically every other tank out there.  Lets face it.  Excellent crews and proper tactics are the real deciding factor on the battlefield.  We are seeing something new though.  We must increase our tech to keep the tank viable. We're seeing what a battlefield full of anti-tank missiles do to tanks acting without proper support.