Sunday, November 03, 2019

Stern Gate Marriage Evolution...pics by Lance Cpl. Nunez






A U.S. Marine Corps AAV-P7/A1 Amphibious Assault Vehicle aboard U.S. Army logistics support vessel USAV CW3 Harold C. Clinger (LSV-2) waits to be transferred to the USS New Orleans (LPD-18) as part of an Army to Navy, ship-to-ship transfer of Marine Corps assets at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, Oct. 24, 2019. The evolution further developed the services’ joint operational capabilities, interoperability and flexibility in the Indo-Pacific region.





New US Army Website...Ground Vehicle Systems Center


From the look of things this new outfit outside Warren, Michigan will be the point men on the Army's ground vehicle modernization effort.  The website seems to indicate that they'll have a heavy focus on US Army efforts to get into service it's robotic vehicle fleet.

Enough babbling.  Check it out here.

Kongsberg signs for Norway's Ground Mobile Anti-Aircraft System (NASAMS)


via ptisidiastima.com
Kongsberg Defense & Aerospace AS (KONGSBERG) today signed a contract with the Norwegian Defense Materials Service worth SEK 583 million for the delivery of a mobile ground-based anti-aircraft system to the Norwegian army.

According to the company in a press release, the Army Mobile Ground Based Air Defense System was first introduced by the Minister of Defense in February 2017 as part of a direct procurement process from KONGSBERG.

This system is an ultra-mobility short-range anti-aircraft defense system that will reuse ready-made basic capabilities from the NASAMS system including a command and control system and unique network-centric solutions.

In addition to data from NASAMS, the system completes the IRIS-T missile from Diehl Defense GmbH as well as a radar from Weibel Scientific A / S.
Story here. 

Kind of a mix and match system they're going for here.  The IRIS-T and a radar from Weibel Scientific (never heard of them)?

Any of my Norwegian readers have a good line on this thing?  They really can't be considering using a M-113 into the future as their rig to transport this system can they?

Open Comment Post. 3 Nov 2019





Saturday, November 02, 2019

US Pandur AGMS around Syrian city of Qamishli.

Note.  We can all pretty much figure out that the "stay to get/protect the oil" was just a ruse by certain parties to maintain a presence in Syria.  Trump fell for it and so we remain.  My question to you all is this.  What is the attraction to Syria?  Why is it considered so vital to US interests that we remain?  Additionally I haven't posted on it here but the Turks just suffered a horrific car bombing in an area that they're occupying.  I'm not sure ISIS has recovered sufficiently to  carry out such an attack so that leaves a dwindling number of suspects.  I won't name them but the list is kinda obvious.

For better or worse the quagmire in Syria continues and like a terrible relationship, we just can't seem to quit it.





B Company, 3rd Battalion, Royal 22e Régiment @ the Basic Jungle Warfare course (Centre d’Entraînement en Forêt Équatoriale) French Guiana

Note.  I stand by this statement.  If you can operate effectively in the jungle then you can operate anywhere!  Every environment has its own unique challenges but I believe that there is a reason why the Royal Marines emphasize jungle warfare and to a lesser degree winter/mountain warfare so much.  In my estimation those are the two most formidable places to work with arctic being a close second to jungle.  Want a "hard" force?  Want a force that can hook and jab anywhere in the world at a moments notice?

Put them in the jungle.  Get them used to the arena where the entire environment crawls, where discomfort isn't just to be expected but to be endured.  Do that and you have a hard force.

Have the Canadians globbed onto that?  Time will tell but I enjoyed these pics.

















Late Open Comment Post. 2 Nov 2019


British ASRAAM discussion. Is it actually better than the AIM-9X Blk III?

Note.  We don't talk missiles much on these pages.  We definitely don't talk much about air to air missiles.  So when I ran across this little cross talk on Tumblr I was intrigued.  I just don't know if they're making good points or bad. I just know it all sounds valid.  Read the article but I guess my bigger question is this.  Should we class the ASRAAM and the AIM-9X Blk III as being a medium and short range missile respectively?  Are we seeing a case to be made for aircraft to carry both missiles in these roles?

 
https://lockheed-martini.tumblr.com/post/188769426124/you-say-that-but-no-the-range-puts-it-on-par
 

Friday, November 01, 2019

Real cost of the F-35B is MORE THAN $166 million dollars?

Thanks to Nuno for the link!


via POGO.org
The most commonly mentioned figure is for the F-35A, the Air Force’s conventional takeoff variant and the least expensive model. The current estimate for the lot of aircraft currently in production is $89.2 million apiece. This figure is the unit recurring flyaway cost—the price tag for just the aircraft and engine, which by themselves do not make a fully functioning weapon system. That $89.2 million does not include procurement funds spent on initial spare parts, flight training simulators, the expensive – and poorly performing – ALIS support system, and more, all unique to the F-35.  You need all of it, not just an air frame and engine – literally not including the cost of fuel to fly it. When we also consider the future modifications necessary to correct both the known and potential design flaws and the aircraft’s $44,000 per-flight-hour cost, it is easy to see why the F-35 program is the most expensive in history.

A handy tool for anyone interested in knowing more about actual costs of military programs and weapons is readily available online. The Pentagon posts budget materials for each fiscal year on the comptroller’s webpage. Included are budget estimates and the justification documents containing more charts and figures than any reasonable person would care to view.

The Air Force’s fiscal year 2020 budget pays for the 48 F-35As in Lot 11. The current $89.2 million dollar price the Pentagon uses is calculated by separating out just the costs for the airframe and the engine from the larger total procurement cost that includes ALIS, simulators, initial spare parts, and more to get to the artificially low $89.2 million. That is far from the whole story.

The Pentagon’s own budget documents list the FY 2020 procurement cost for those 48 aircraft as more than $101 million, nearly $12 million more than the figure rolled out for press reports. Using the Navy’s charts and the same math shows that the real costs for each F-35C is more than $123 million, while each F-35B costs in excess of $166 million. But even that figure doesn’t tell the whole story.
Story here.

POGO makes a compelling case and their links check out. 

What do you all say?

A National Guard Armored Brigade Combat Team is leading the way in Syria?



Well that concept has become a reality.

I never actually thought we'd see the day that National Guard forces would deploy ahead of active duty troops but we're seeing it all too often now.

We must ask why (IMO).

Yeah.  I'm cynical as hell and quite honestly thinking that its EXTREMELY misguided.

From my seat it has its roots to the earlier fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. Units were rotating in and out and because of the size of our force you saw "repeat" rotations.

The solution from the head shed?

Spread the pain.

Fully integrate the National Guard/Reserves into the effort and while the ops tempo was high, the individual unit/Soldier wouldn't feel it as much.

Good on the surface, terrible in the way it's been implemented.

No one talks about it and I can't prove it but despite drawdowns the strain on our troops remains high.  The ops tempo continue to ramp upward.

Don't get me wrong.  I'm sure this is a capable unit and they will perform well. But at the end of the day we have people that are training everyday to perform the mission and they're sitting on the sidelines while part time Soldiers are headed off to do some very heavy lifting.

I might be wrong but it strikes me as being more than slightly off.

Syrian War News. Fierce clashes erupt between Syrian army, Turkish-led forces

via Al Jazeera.
Heavy fighting between Syrian army troops and Turkish forces erupted near Ras al-Ain as Turkish-backed forces seized villages surrounding the border town.

Turkish-backed rebels said there were intermittent clashes between the two militaries in recent days south of the town, which Turkey seized from Syrian Kurdish-led forces earlier this month.

Al Jazeera's Hashem Ahelbarra, reporting from the border town of Sanliurfa, said thousands of people were fleeing the fighting near Ras al-Ain and Tal Tamr towns.

Turkish-backed Syrian opposition fighters - known as the Syrian National Army (SNA) - launched an offensive and took over areas previously under control of Kurdish fighters south of Ras al-Ain, he said.

As fighting intensified, Syrian troops deployed reinforcements from Derbasiyah to Tal Tamr.

"The SNA took over western parts of the town. People have had enough each time someone controls the area and ends up being worse than the previous armed group," one Tal Tamr resident told Al Jazeera.

"I am concerned for my children, this is why I am leaving. The Syrian army is on the frontline to stop the rebels' offensive, but you never know."
Story here.

This is under the radar in the US.  The impeachment hearings, approaching holiday season, cold weather over most of the nation and wild fires in California is gobbling up the news.

Add to all of the above a general weariness with the mess that is the Middle East and its understandable.

But don't look away.

Syria is a clusterfuck of epic proportions.

My prediction?

Most aren't paying attention but this ain't over by a longshot.  You think we've seen the worst?  I think 2020 is gonna be a kick in the ass with regard to Syria.

Open Comment Post. 1 Nov 2019