![]() |
The Armstrong Whitworth AW.681, also designated the Whitworth Gloster 681 or Hawker Siddeley HS.681 - due to industry mergers - was a pretty unique transport design from Britain’s 1960s aviation industry. Fulfilling a similar short takeoff and landing specification as Lockheed’s C-130, Armstrong Whitworth produced a solid contender in the AW.681, featuring vectored thrust nozzles, boundary layer control, blown flaps, leading edges and ailerons.
Then they took things a little further, trading the four Rolls-Royce RB.142 Medway engines for four Bristol Siddeley Pegasus turbofans, to obtain VTOL capability. These were the engines which went on to power the Harrier. It would have been an interesting sight. Thanks to the swept shoulder-mounted wings and high T-tail, it would have also resembled today’s C-17 and A400M.
The entire project was scrapped in 1964 when the moment’s Labour Government announced a defence spending review, opting instead to buy the American Lockheed C-130. As a result the company closed it’s Coventry factory, making 5000 redundant.
Source: apostlesofmercy
|
Thursday, December 19, 2019
Blast from the past....Armstrong Whitworth AW.681
Note. Thank God that either the British Govt killed their defense industry with idiotic after idiotic white paper or as many Brits think the US military industrial complex did. If whoever didn't they'd be a force to be reckoned with. Going over the list of projects that they killed in the crib is stunning. If even half were allowed to go into production the sun still might never set on the British empire...and even if it did they'd be a major arms innovation center today and into the future.
Tuesday, December 17, 2019
Strange ALTAY Main Battle Tank Info...need a Turkish Translation...
-YENI BILGI-— Turan Oguz (@TyrannosurusRex) December 17, 2019
Altay icin 3 kez pazarlik yaptilar, tank basi 17 milyon Avro'dan asagi inmedi Otokar
Ihale acildi. Biz tank basi 10 milyon Avro'ya indik, tank basi 1 milyon Avro karimiz oluyordu. Cumhurbaskani’na gitti 1 milyonumuzdan kesti
(Kaynak: BMC Yon Kur Bsk Ethem Sancak) pic.twitter.com/oM2l80Hx6T
Supacat Recovery Vehicle (Twitter Vid)...
LWR proving its agility as well as recovering a fully laden casualty vehicle @3Cdo_Bde @LDLightCav @16AirAssltBde pic.twitter.com/YmdXwUucia— Supacat (@SupacatLtd) December 17, 2019
French Armed Forces pic thread (mostly ground)...
Note. French Armed Forces don't get the love they deserve on these pages. Decided to give them a little time in the sun. Hope you enjoy the pics....
Correction. Picture posted yesterday was of the SISU GPV (General Purpose Vehicle)...
I posted the above pic yesterday and incorrectly labeled it the SISU GTP. I was wrong. Luckily I have the proper scoop thanks to P&M Twitter Page...
So far we have 2/4 of these variants in flesh in public. First order for an undisclosed European private company has been signed already. Wonder what a 30x113m turret would look like on one of these, maybe in Latvian camo. pic.twitter.com/sqf1kONL2p— P&M (@Foliohat) December 17, 2019
Do yourself a favor and follow this dude. He always tweets good stuff!
Russia is beefing up its forces in Crimea...
#Russia will deploy a new VDV airborne regiment to occupied #Crimea by 2021.— Petri Mäkelä (@pmakela1) December 17, 2019
Regiment will expand the 7th Airborne Division stationed in Novorossiysk from two to three regiments.
Other VDV divisions are also expanded.#crimeaisukraine https://t.co/bWNssru6FX
I wonder. Why VDV instead of motorized infantry? Yeah I know VDV's in Russia's table of forces have a degree of mechanization but not to the extent of a purebred motorized infantry division.
Is this a move to send a signal? Are they so confident in their hybrid warfare scheme that they don't have to send heavier forces? Is even this force more than capable of holding onto gains against Ukrainian attempts to take back the land (assuming they even want to...and I assume they do), or something else entirely?
China's first unmanned cargo ship makes maiden test
Hmm.— NavyRecognition (@NavyRecognition) December 17, 2019
Robotic ships? Isn't the USMC & USN heading in this direction? Does anyone know if we have a testbed in the water?
I've read about concepts that go back at least a decade but haven't/don't recall us actually floating one.
2C38 combat vehicle code-named "Derivation"
#BREAKING :#Russia : Test frames of the latest 2C38 combat vehicle code-named "Derivation", is taking place in Nizhny Novgorod. pic.twitter.com/PUGXJAsf5u— Conflict Intelligence Network 🌐 (@ConflictTeam) December 17, 2019
Subscribe to:
Comments
(
Atom
)


















