Thursday, February 11, 2021

Spanish Marines still believe in direct firepower

Ya know what's interesting?  I don't believe you see any other Marine Corps/Naval Infantry on this planet following the USMC's lead.

If this concept is so innovative then why is no one following?

If this concept can be applied worldwide then why is no one following?

It's simple.

The USMC is a one region/one foe force. 

AMX10RC

 

USMC orders more Amphibious Combat Vehicles via Shepard Media

 


via Shepard Media

BAE Systems Land & Armaments will provide the USMC with 36 more full-rate production Amphibious Combat Vehicles (ACVs), under a $183.64 million contract modification from Marine Corps Systems Command.

This brings the total cumulative value of the contract to $3.3 billion.

Work is expected to be completed in April 2023, the DoD announced on 10 February.

The USMC has a requirement for 579 ACVs, but the need for additional mission variants could increase the number procured to more than 700.

It is planned for the first 204 vehicles to be equipped as standard personnel carriers while tests are carried out on the mission variants.

To date 50 ACVs have been delivered to the USMC, according to Shephard Defence Insight. The latest option increases the total number of vehicles under full-rate production to 72 for a total value of $366 million, BAE Systems noted on 11 February.

Ya know this just doesn't make sense.

It doesn't fit with Berger's concept and we know from statements (they've said the Littoral Regiment can be used in the Middle East, Balklands and N. Europe) that they're looking to expand the Littoral Regiment concept Marine Corps wide.

So why buy a vehicle that doesn't fit with future plans?

The USMC is gonna be a JLTV, missile slinging ground force with no capability for close combat (outside of Recon) and apparently not interested in ground combat at all.

A carrier for Marine Infantry just DOES NOT make sense.  Hell does Marine Infantry even make sense for Berger's force?

Early Experiments are Proving Out Tank-Free Marine Corps Concept

 via USNI News

Ongoing testing and experimentation are proving the Marine Corps can be more lethal even while being lighter and more maneuverable, as the service evolves to support littoral operations under its Force Design 2030 plan, a top general said today.

Lt. Gen. Eric Smith, the deputy commandant for combat development and integration, today described how the Marine Corps’ evolution over the next couple years would allow for a small group of 75 Marines to pose such a great threat that the adversary would have to divert resources to find and counter them.

These groups of 75 Marines, already located in the first island chain in the Pacific and relying on their own organic aircraft and surface ships for mobility, “[will begin] to have an effect on the adversary’s ability to fully track where everyone is. In the past, you would think, ‘well there’s 75 Marines in location X, they’re not a threat.’ If I can sink one of your billion-and-a-half-dollar warships with a one-and-a-half-million-dollar missile, I am a threat. And that may change the calculus, if I can do that and rapidly move using things like our Joint Light Tactical Vehicle and make it incredibly hard for you to find me, both in the electromagnetic spectrum and physically on the ground because of my mobility. You have to respect that very small unit of which we will have dozens and dozens and dozens placed strategically throughout,” he said while speaking at the International Armoured Vehicles Conference, hosted by Defence IQ.

Smith used the anti-armor mission as an example of how the service evolving. Before, the Marines would use their own tanks to target enemy tanks. Now, the service is divesting its entire fleet of tanks to free up money to invest in higher priorities. Instead, it can use long-range precision munitions launched from the back of a JLTV to destroy enemy tanks from a more mobile posture and from longer ranges.

“The experimentation that we’ve done now to date successfully using lightweight mounted fires – think the back of a Joint Light Tactical Vehicle – is killing armor at ranges, rough calculation, about 15, 20 times the range that a main battle tank can kill another main battle tank,” Smith said. He added the Marine Corps didn’t get rid of its tanks because they weren’t good at taking out adversary tanks, but rather “we can kill armor formations at longer ranges using additional and other resources without incurring a 74-ton challenge trying to get that to a shore, or to get it from the United States into the fight. You simply can’t be there in time.”

Of course that's bullshit. 

It's not even good spin and whoever this bubba is he should be fired instantly for telling obvious lies.

Oh and make no mistake about it.  This ain't for our consumption.  This is for all the Marine Officers/SNCOs that doubt this monstrosity being foisted on the Corps.

Killing tanks from long distance with JLTVs?  Whole formations?  Are you shitting me?  But wait.  This pile of hot steaming poo gets better...

Precision fires is among the priorities the Navy has focused on during research and development and experimentation efforts. Smith said the service would have ground-based anti-ship missiles that the Marines could use to push enemies back hundreds of miles from a contested piece of land.

“That is sea denial, and that supports our naval partners, our fleet commanders, in distributed maritime operations,” Smith said, adding that it would allow U.S. Navy ships to focus on the sea control piece of the portfolio.

Additionally, other R&D and experimentation efforts have centered on enablers to be successful in what the Marines are calling the “hider-finder challenge” inside the enemy’s weapons engagement zone: if both the Marines and the enemy are trying to find each other and avoid being detected themselves, whoever wins that first stage of the competition has an advantage in the next stage – whether it’s the adversary trying to escalate, or the Marines trying to take a decisive action to force the adversary to deescalate.

They're really trying to flesh out the "competition" thing.  I don't get it.  This bubba really thinks penny packets of Marines will cause an enemy to deescalate?

Drug test that fucker immediately!  He's smoking that good shit!

Forget that.

I'm off on a tangent.

Read the whole thing here. 

Turkish armored vehicle Ejder Yalçın retrofits new mortar system

Story here

Rheinmetall Artillery – Range Dominance.

 

BAE - Ground-launched precision

 

PARS iZCi

Open Comment Post. 11 Feb 2021

Wednesday, February 10, 2021

Patria AMVXP and Patria 6X6, Patria Arctic Testing Team presents

US Army conducts "littoral combat" exercises on the Black Sea...the USMC has boxed itself into the Pacific region.

 via USNI News.

The Army is concentrating this year’s major European Defender exercise on training for high-end warfare in the Balkans and the Black Sea, the service’s top general there said last week.

Speaking at an online forum of the Association of the United States Army, Gen. Christopher Cavoli, commanding general of U.S. Army Europe and Africa Command, said final planning is underway for the exercise scheduled for late spring or early summer. It would take place around the Black Sea, waters that have drawn an increased amount of American naval presence through freedom of navigation operations, and emphasize the use of high-end enablers in conflict.

Here

Left unsaid thru out the article is the use of Army anti-ship missiles to "shape the sea battle".

You can bet that capability will be simulated though.

If the Army does this in Europe then you can bet it'll follow thru to the Middle East.

Which leaves the USMC as a one region force, waiting for a war that might never come.

The Pandemic That Lasted 15 Million Years