Thursday, March 17, 2011

What was the movie???

090816-N-4205W-017 JOHN C. STENNIS SPACE CENTER, Miss. (Aug. 16, 2009) Special warfare combatant-craft crewmen (SWCC) from Special Boat Team (SBT) 22 operate a special operations craft-riverine during the filming of a scene in a upcoming major motion picture. The movie is due in theaters in 2010. (U.S. Navy photo by Chief Mass Communication Specialist Kathryn Whittenberger/Released)

090816-N-4205W-033 JOHN C. STENNIS SPACE CENTER, Miss. (Aug. 16, 2009) Special warfare combatant-craft crewmen (SWCC) from Special Boat Team 22 operate a special operations craft-riverine (SOC-R) during the filming of a scene in an upcoming major motion picture. The movie is due in theaters in 2010. (U.S. Navy photo by Chief Mass Communication Specialist Kathryn Whittenberger/Released)


If you read the captions on the above photos they talk about the Riverine's performing for a movie that supposedly came out in 2010...what was the movie???

Why the F-35 scares...


I've pondered long and hard about one thing.

Why does the F-35 scare its critics so much?

I can come up with only one answer.


It will drive fighter production and innovation for the foreseeable future.

Consider this.

With just the Navy/Marine Corps buy of this airplane, it will out number the total production of Eurofighters in service or planned.

With the combined Air Force/Navy/Marine Corps buy, it will out strip the purchase of the Eurofighter, Rafale and Gripen.

It will be---with just US purchases of this airplane...the dominant fighter on the planet.

Add in the allies and you have total dominance in the fighter market.

And thats the real fear.  Another market that the US will dominate...and for some that must not be allowed...even if their industry has a stake in the production.

Defense Talk's Concept Russian LCS Ships.






Its only a matter of time.  While these are concepts that some kid or even a professional artist came up with showing his vision of the future, you can bet that either the Russians or the Chinese are actually taking steps to duplicate and then perfect our designs.

Awesome stuff from my boys at Defense Talk.

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

The Mainstream Media Gets It! Build More AMPHIBS!


I got this from NRAINSTRUCTOR (thanks buddy!  welcome aboard!)
via The Atlantic...(follow the link and read the whole thing)
Of the 11 commissioned U.S. warships ships en route to Japan, almost half are big Cold War-era amphibious assault vessels purpose-built to land Marines on hostile shores. But while these unglamorous transport ships dispatch helicopters and critical aid to a grateful ally, they're being marginalized by a Navy that tends to fixate on the capabilities to wage a high-tech, blue-water war, while underestimating the importance of mundane disaster-response work in maintaining our global power and influence.

The Navy's amphibious forces have carried out the lion's share of America's disaster-response work, responding to 114 crises and contingencies over the past 20 years. Yet this enviable record means little inside the beltway. With the recent cancellation of the pricey $25-million dollar Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle, a specialized floating tank meant to speed Marines from sea to shore, defense leaders are signaling that troop transporters, helicopter carriers, and other old-school "charge the beach" tools of amphibious warfare are obsolete and not worth full funding. The EFV deserved cancellation for a number of reasons, not the least of which was its price tag, but skeptics of amphibious warfare are using the EFV's demise to claim that the amphibious fleet as a whole has lost its reason for being and should be cut.

But even as Washington cuts, more countries are investing in amphibious warfare platforms than ever before.
Not the story big Navy wants out.

Not a story about the glorious aircraft carriers.

Not a story about the exotic and powerful destroyers.

Not a story about a "Global Force for Good".

A story about the busiest ships in the fleet. 

ABOUT DAMN TIME!


Two articles, Two different views of an Israeli V-22.

FlightGlobal has two articles.

The first (here) indicates that the Israeli Air Force is again looking at the V-22 for Special Forces use.  The second (an earlier piece found here) shows that they studied it for two years and decided on the CH-53K.

No doubt the instability in the Middle East has caused a re-examination of capabilities.  Make no doubt about it.  Israel is slowing but surely getting back on a war time footing and making/planning buys to address current shortfalls.
But in a rare statement to the air force magazine, Maj Gen David Barki, head of the helicopter air division, said that the air force is considering future procurement of the V-22. "It is not included in the multi-year plan that will terminate next year. But one option that we consider for the future, is the V-22. This aircraft can give us operational capabilities that we don't have today."
Israeli experts say that the new interest in the V-22 is for fast deployment of Special Forces troops and medical evacuation.

A movie review by Terminal Lance.

This guy is crazy!...in a very good way...oh and the review is of the movie "Battle:LA" so get your mind outta the gutter when you see the cartoon below.

Terminal Lance #113 “Battle: LA”

By Max on March 15th, 2011
I will tell you, as I told my wife when we exited the theater on Sunday after seeing the new film Battle: Los Angeles, that this film was “moto-boner food”. Yes, a delectable snack for your moto-boner to feast off of and gain energy greater than even the largest BFC Monster could offer.
I read no reviews going into the film, I knew they would be resoundingly negative–as most high-budget sci-fi films are. Ebert was rather harsh, I felt, giving said film only half a star. As he put it:
“Battle: Los Angeles” is noisy, violent, ugly and stupid. Its manufacture is a reflection of appalling cynicism on the part of its makers, who don’t even try to make it more than senseless chaos. Here’s a science-fiction film that’s an insult to the words “science” and “fiction,” and the hyphen in between them. You want to cut it up to clean under your fingernails.
And that’s just the first paragraph!
My feelings toward the film weren’t nearly as biting. I feel like as Marines, we automatically appreciate any film that does us some good light, and Battle: Los Angeles does this well. This is where I felt Battle: Los Angeles succeeds–it’s relatively realistic portrayal of modern Marines. Aaron Eckhart was a good choice to play a typical hard-ass hollywood Marine–though I didn’t quite get how he was retiring as a Staff Sergeant (he said he’d been in for 20 years). He was apparently awarded for whatever awful incident happened in Afghanistan, so we had no reason to believe he had been busted down.
Outside of this though, I had two main small gripes–the fact that they kept referring to the FOB (Forward Operating Base) as the “F.O.B.” (eff-oh-bee). I suppose there may have been some kind of Asian misunderstanding–but in real life, we say “fob”. The second being their dispersion in the beginning alley scene, which any infantry Marine can testify was beyond absurd.
Otherwise, the film was really what I expected a movie called “Battle: Los Angeles” to be. It was a battle, and it took place in Los Angeles. There were aliens, there were Marines, things got fucked up. I actually appreciated the complete lack of a coherent story–I mean come on, why waste our time? No one needed to fall in love, no kids needed to kick a velociraptor out a window with her gymnastics skills, and no one needed to explain why the aliens were there. If you were going into Battle: Los Angeles expecting something thought provoking, I encourage you to learn to read movie titles.
That said, the film was complete boner-food. Food for your boner. Specifically, your moto-boner. It will get you hard, jerk you off, and even cup the balls. Oorah?
A quick reminder, I will be at WonderCon April 1st through the 3rd in San Francisco, CA. For those of you who don’t follow these things, WonderCon is the Bay Area’s big comic convention, run by the same people that put on Comic Con every year in San Diego. I’ll be there with the Concord Vet Center, giving out some post cards and a few T-shirts, as well as signing whatever you put in front of me.
Lastly, but certainly not least, be sure to check out Terminal Lance weekly in the Marine Corps Times on newsstands every Monday (Tuesday for Hawaii).


Bollocks!

via Wikipedia...
Bollocks [ˈbÉ’lÉ™ks] is a word of Anglo-Saxon origin, meaning "testicles". The word is often used figuratively in English, as a noun to mean "nonsense", an expletive following a minor accident or misfortune, or an adjective to mean "poor quality" or "useless". Similarly, the common phrases "Bollocks to this!" or "That's a load of old bollocks " generally indicate contempt for a certain task, subject or opinion. 


NAVAL AIR STATION PATUXENT RIVER, Md. -Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus, Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Gary Roughead, and Commandant of the Marine Corps Gen. James Amos signed a memorandum of understanding on Navy and Marine Corps tactical aircraft integration on March 14, 2011. Under the memorandum, the Marine Corps will provide five fixed-wing squadrons to the carrier air wing. The Marine Corps will purchase 80 F-35C aircraft, the carrier-based variant of the Joint Strike Fighter, and 340 F-35B aircraft, the short take-off vertical landing variant. The decision to purchase F-35Cs is a representative of the Marine Corps’ commitment to tactical aircraft integration with the Navy. The continued development of the F-35B remains the centerpiece of the Corps' fixed-wing modernization program., Andy Wolfe, Lockheed Martin, 2/26/2011 8:13 AM
Via ARES Blog...
The arranged marriage between the USMC and Navy is official on F-35. CNO Adm. Gary Roughead and Marine Corps Commandant James Amos today signed a "tactical aviation integration" agreement whereby the Marines will purchase some F-35Cs to operate from Navy aircraft carriers. The plan is for the Marines to buy 80 F-35C carrier versions and another 340 F-35B Stovl aircraft.

Monday, March 14, 2011

Why another aircraft carrier? Japan needs a MPF and Hospital Ship.

USNS Comfort receives supplies during an underway replenishment with USNS Robert E. Peary
MV Cpl. Louis J. Hauge Jr.
A barge carrying Marine Corps vehicles approaches USNS Pfc. Dewayne T. Williams
ASD News is reporting that another aircraft carrier is on its way to Japan.
"We currently have an aircraft carrier in Japan, and another is on the way," Obama said. He said another ship was heading to US territories in the Mariana Islands to "assist as needed."

A Pentagon spokesman said the two carriers were the USS George Washington, which is based at Yokosuka near Tokyo, and the USS Ronald Reagan, which was en route to South Korea for exercises and has been redirected to Japan.
Why?

Unless their are security concerns that I'm not aware of then what the Japanese people really need is (in addition to the Marines already on the island)...

1.  Activation of the 82nd's Ready Brigade.  I understand that its been stood up again after a hiatus.  Now is as good a reason as any to test its capabilities.
2.  A hospital ship to treat injured civilians.  Local hospitals are state of the art but are suffering from rolling blackouts...possibly a shortage of personnel due to the tremendous loss of life and also possibly damage from the earthquake and tsunami.  A hospital ship would be a life saver.
3.  An MPF ship.  The Marines have alot of helicopters in the area.  The Japanese forces can provide even more...what they might lack is organic heavy equipment.  If roads are impassable then we're talking weeks, maybe months until they can be repaired.  Rescue operations will require cranes, bulldozers and other equipment to start the search.  The Japanese authorities can start working north from unaffected areas but to get to the zone quickly a port must be established.  Since they were damaged then the amphibious capabilities of the MPF and their assorted equipment must be brought to bear.

An aircraft carrier is the last thing Japan needs...unless they're worried that N. Korea is about to do something stupid.

Welsh Guards Battlegroup Sniper. One bullet...Two kills.

via the Telegraph.
Within 40 days, the two marksmen from 4 Rifles, part of the Welsh Guards Battle group, had achieved 75 confirmed kills with 31 attributed to Potter and 44 to Osmond. Each kill was chalked up as a little stick man on the beam above the firing position in their camouflaged sangar beside the base gate – a stick man with no head denoting a target eliminated with a shot to the skull.
Follow the link.  Fascinating.

Sunday, March 13, 2011

XC-120. A transport that should have made it to production.

Something other than war is taking place in Afghanistan.

Ya know...when you see these types of events taking place inside a so-called war zone...then you have something other than a war going on.  Full blown nation building?  A relaxed view of the threat?  But when you have Infantrymen running a half marathon instead of being out on patrol its worrying.

Maybe I'm making assumptions that I shouldn't...I know I took heat for the Officer that sponsored a men's water polo team for the ANA but this just doesn't feel right.

CAMP BASTION, Afghanistan-Lance Cpl. Richard J. Powell, an infantryman with 1st Battalion, 23rd Marine Regiment, Marine Corps Reserve, took first place in a half marathon on Camp Bastion, Afghanistan, with a time of 1 hour, 22 minutes, March 13. Powell finished first out of more than 400 coalition troops and civilians who took part in the run.
, Lance Cpl. Samantha H. Arrington, 3/13/2011 5:54 AM


And here's the story....

Coalition forces double-time through Camp Bastion, Afghanistan 


CAMP BASTION, Afghanistan  — Lance Cpl. Richard J. Powell, an infantryman with 1st Battalion, 23rd Marine Regiment, Marine Corps Reserve, took first place in a half marathon on Camp Bastion, Afghanistan, with a time of 1 hour, 22 minutes, March 13. Powell finished first out of more than 400 coalition troops and civilians who took part in the run.
UPDATE:
Is this why we see the nonsense of controversies like 'only grunts' should have crossed rifles in their rank insignia?  Do we have two wars going on?  One where frontline personnel are actually carrying the burden while those in the rear have almost a stateside existence?

Yes I know this has been going on since warfare began but its NOT RIGHT, ITS UNSEEMLY and someone should find better stuff for a deployed USMC Rifleman to be doing...he can run half marathons in the states...NOT IN THE FUCKING WAR ZONE!

Saturday, March 12, 2011

CH-46's riding to the rescue.

A short video of CH-46's working in Japan during the relief effort.

Is it just me or will we look back at this simple, risk free helicopter and miss those qualities?  I think we will but time will tell.


Now I know what you're thinking.  What could have performed the same mission as the CH-46 but been a lower risk solution than the MV-22?  How about the Boeing 360?

BattleHawk...the Navy's way back to its SeaWolf legacy.

S70-054_ABH_BR_hi                                                                                                   

During the Vietnam war the US Navy operated Huey helicopters in the armed gunship role to great effect.  They were known as SeaWolves and they terrorized the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese troops.  If the Navy is going to get serious about combating modern threats...piracy, fighting in the littorals, stopping missile boats before they close to major ships and even operating in blue water then its time to bring this capability to the fleet.

Visit SealWolf.org to get a view of a lost but fascinating part of naval history.

Big Navy attempts to justify carriers...proves the opposite.


Galrahn has a post on the relief efforts in Japan with an updated list of the ships involved.  Awesome stuff.  Where we go in opposite directions is his last paragraph....
With the USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) expected to serve as a helicopter support base offshore for both US Navy and Japanese SDF helicopters, once again the nuclear powered aircraft carrier is poised to be the most versatile and flexible capability in responding to the needs following an international catastrophe.
What the fuck?

Talk about justifying using super carriers in an LHD role!

We've gone over it and I've rechecked the numbers.  Unless the CVN dumps its entire airwing and reloads with helos (which in order to fill it out would have to come from LHDs anyway)....one LHD has the helo lift of 5 aircraft carriers.

One.

Additionally the LHD has onboard a surgical hospital, and is designed to handle refugees...the CVN isn't.

The LHD can offload troops and have space tailor made for those needing extra bunks...like Japanese Helicopter Crews in the middle of rescue operations....the CVN can do likewise but will have to jump thru hoops to do it.

What are we actually seeing in the Navy's deployment of ships to these recent disaster zones?

1.  The budget wars are here.  An aircraft carrier steaming at 35 knots to Haiti...an aircraft carrier steaming to Japan...all show no go.  Just like the Coast Guard sending ships to Haiti...they can get there first--make claims about all the work they're doing but its all about publicity and budget more than getting the actual work done.  Show over go!

2.  Bastardizing the Sea Base concept.  Simply having an assemblage of ships operating off a coast is not a sea base.  I'll be watching Marine Corps reaction to these events...if they even whisper the term sea base in describing this then the sea base concept as I've read it is as dead as disco.

3.  Looks matter more than performance.  Watching the Navy get the "facts" out about the action in Japan indicates that our PAO's have jumped the shark.  What do I mean?  Its no longer about actually telling the story to the American people but in tailoring it in such a way as to emphasize certain weapon systems...ships etc...

Information should be provided to the public...we don't need publicist in uniform.

UPDATE:
This photo by MS1 Steve Smith shows to good effect the potential for the LPD-17 class to revolutionize amphibious operations in general and disaster relief in particular.  Note the number of helos on the deck of this LPD!  Two CH-53's and other helicopters plus room for a MV-22 to land?  That represents more than the standard number of helicopters found on a CVN.  Amphibs prove their worth...carriers show the flag.
UPDATE 1:
Another fallacy needs to be put to rest on this operation.  A fleet of ships does not constitute a sea base.  An aircraft carrier that leaves its planes on shore and becomes a helicopter carrier is not a sea base....we need to make sure that we stick to the approved USMC definition of a sea base...otherwise we will be left with a pale version of the same.
 UPDATE 2:
The USMC has removed its Sea Basing Site and all the information within from the web.  Why they've taken this action is beyond me...luckily I have archived past information...future developments will be hard to come by.  It seems that the proper telling of the USMC's story and the debate about its future needs will be done outside the view of the public.

BattleHawk ... the video..

Saw this on Military Photos.net. 

Ordinary SAILORS dabble in Marine/Special Ops mission sets and WIN!


Thanks MUCH Lee.  Seems that you solved this mystery for us...you also help explain why Navy Public Affairs was tongue tied when it came to describing the unit involved in this rescue....

Remember my post here???  In it I asked if perhaps a new Special Ops Unit had been created and wondered why they were keeping it so hush hush....

Well the answer to that question is here.

When they climbed aboard Saturday with a rickety ladder made from welded scrap, the four Somalis suspected of trying to hijack a massive Japanese oil tanker probably figured their plan would go off without a hitch: They'd round up the crew, take control of the tanker, and do with it as they pleased.
Instead, they ended up in the custody of the Norfolk-based Navy ship Bulkeley, after what local sailors described Tuesday as a botched attempt at piracy.
In phone interviews from the Indian Ocean, Bulkeley crew members provided new details about their involvement in freeing the Japanese vessel and arresting the Somalis. They said the Somalis were never able to gain access to their prospective hostages, who had barricaded themselves in the tanker's control room.
Ultimately the Somalis surrendered, and they remain on the Bulkeley, where they are being kept under 24-hour watch, said Cmdr. Chris DeGregory, the Bulkeley's top officer.
"For us, it couldn't have gone better," DeGregory said. "Our training paid off."
While he said it’s not yet clear what will happen to the suspected pirates next, the Japanese press is reporting that the country’s government plans to bring them to Japan for prosecution. American officials couldn’t immediately confirm that.
The ordeal began Saturday afternoon when the Bulkeley, a guided-missile destroyer with a crew of about 300, received a distress call from the Japanese tanker, the Guanabara, about 300 nautical miles off the coast of Oman.
The Bulkeley left Norfolk in January for a roughly six-month deployment as part of an international anti-piracy task force. It was one of four U.S. Navy ships that tried last month to free four Americans who were taken hostage by Somali pirates off East Africa; the hostages were later shot and killed.
When the Guanabara's distress call went out, the Bulkeley was the closest available responder. It reached the Guanabara around 9 p.m. that night.
DeGregory said the Bulkeley was able to make contact with the tanker's crew by both radio and satellite phone, and they were able to describe the situation: There were 24 of them, from a variety of nations, against four Somalis armed with automatic rifles.
As soon as the Somalis boarded the tanker, the crew members had barricaded themselves in the control room, and so far, the Somalis hadn't been able to get in.
"That's the best thing they could have done," DeGregory said.
He said the Bulkeley stayed in contact with the tanker crew throughout the night, as the Somalis continued to try to break in. The next morning, a Turkish warship arrived, and both the Turks and the Americans sent up helicopters.
The Bulkeley also began playing loud, pre-recorded messages in Somali urging the pirates to surrender.
Finally, around 9 a.m., the Somalis laid down their weapons, gathered at the Guanabara's bow and began waving pieces of white cloth. That's when the Bulkeley's boarding team went to work.
In two small boats, the team's 19 members headed for the tanker, then climbed aboard near the stern, said Ensign Michael Seymour, the team leader.
Jameson Siegrist, a 24-year-old second - class petty officer, was the first one up.
"It was definitely one of the most intense moments of my life," Siegrist said. "Definitely an adrenaline rush."
As the rest of the team made it on deck, the sailors approached the Somalis, ordering them to keep their hands up and then lie down. "They were very compliant," Seymour said.
With the four Somalis secured, the Bulkeley team proceeded to search the Guanabara to make sure no others were hiding below decks. Once they cleared the tanker, its crew emerged.
"You could tell they were very happy to see us," Seymour said. "You could see the relief on their faces."
He said the Somalis had used a makeshift ladder made from welded scrap to board the Guanabara. The Somalis' original vessel wasn't found. The Somalis remain on the deck of the Bulkeley, Seymour said, adding that they are being fed rice and beans and kept out of the weather.
The Japanese press is reporting that the country is making arrangements with the U.S. Navy for the suspected pirates to be brought to Oman, where a Japanese team will pick them up and take them to Japan for prosecution.
Japan’s plans come in response to a request from the United States, the newspaper Yomiuri Shimbun reported today.

Corinne Reilly, (757) 446-2949, corinne.reilly@pilotonline.com
A Destroyer crew...A well trained crew...But not certified "Special Ops" capable crew...Did what the FBI Negotiators and an undisclosed team of snake eaters failed to do...they pulled off a text book rescue of a hijacked ship.

Don't get me wrong.  The pirates that seized the missionaries were brutal and it might well have been a no win situation...but they had individuals whose primary mission and focus was battling pirates.  This crew not only have anti-piracy missions but the other 100's of other tasks that a crew has to perform not only during wartime but on a daily basis.

Extremely well done Squids!  And believe you me...I say Squid with nothing but respect.

Friday, March 11, 2011

Amphibs again prove their worth.

Defense Tech is reporting this...

Here’s a quick rundown of the tech the U.S. military is sending to help in the aftermath of the massive earthquake and tsunami that just hit Japan. From a Pentagon news release:
  • The USS Tortuga, in Sasebo, Japan, is preparing to load landing craft and to leave for the disaster areas as early as this evening.
  • The USS Essex, with the embarked 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, arrived in Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia, this morning. The ship is preparing to depart as early as this evening.
  • The USS Blue Ridge, in Singapore, is taking on humanitarian assistance and disaster relief supplies and preparing to depart tomorrow morning.
  • The USS Ronald Reagan carrier strike group, at sea in the western Pacific on its way to Korea, can respond if directed.
So far, there are no reports of U.S. military casualties or major damage to American military equipment in Japan.
4 ships on call...2 are amphibs...1 is a carrier and 1 is a command ship.

Why this mix?

Quite simply...Manpower and equipment.

Disasters require personnel to physically search for and treat survivors...operate heavy equipment for clean up...fly helicopters to aid in casualty evacuation....man amphibious assault vehicle to travel flooded areas to reach stranded persons..etc...

A unique capability found on amphibious ships.  A capability not found on Destroyers...Subs...Frigates or Patrol Ships.

It does little good for a ship to arrive in 2 hours if it can't provide meaningful assistance.

A carrier---as effective a ship of war as it is---doesn't have the resources to provide the kind of assistance that is needed.


It can show the flag but it can't do the work.

Amphibs again prove their worth.

Force Protection Ocelot. Let's get real about its size.


Time to get real about the Force Protection Ocelot.  Its not a small vehicle.  Its almost 18 feet long.  Its almost 8 feet tall.  Its narrower than a HUMVEE but only by a few inches....and once the HUMVEEs are RESET and Upgraded they will only gain a capsule and suspension improvements.  Meaning that they will be no wider and will probably only match the Ocelot in height.  Much as my buddy Think Defence loves the Ocelot, its not the world beater that our friends across the pond might want us to believe.

via Wikipedia...Production history
Designer Ricardo Plc / Force Protection Europe
Designed 2009–2010
Manufacturer Force Protection Europe
Produced 2011– (projected)
Variants Prototype
Specifications
Weight 7,500 kg (7.4 long tons)
Length 5.32 m (17 ft 5 in)
Width 2.1 m (6 ft 11 in)
Height 2.35 m (7 ft 9 in)

Speed 110 km/h (68 mph)