Marine Special Ops. A capability the Marine Corps can't afford and the nation doesn't need.

Via Military.com

Currently the number of MarSoc Marines stands at about 1,000 — drawing mostly from the Force Recon community but also from some high-speed infantry guys and other intel-centric MOSs. Hejlik said he sees the force growing to about 5,000, or about as many SEALs in the Navy.

and this...

The general also said he envisions the Corps establishing a separate air wing to support MarSoc missions — a controversial gap when the units were established back in 2006. But he admitted that given current budget realities, it’s going to “take some time” for the service to eek out the cash to buy planes for the Leatherneck snake-eaters.

I mean seriously.

What the fuck is the General thinking?

The idea that the Marine Corps could possibly drop down to an end strength of 150, 000 to a high of 175,000 Marines and then allocate up to 5,000 Marines for Special Operations is crazy.  If you add in aircraft like the General is talking about then you have a Marine Special Forces Expeditionary Brigade sized unit.

That's insane.

No knock on Marine Special Ops but what mission are they doing that isn't already accomplished by Navy SEALs, Army Special Forces, Army Rangers or the tier one units Delta or SEAL Team 6?

Rummy forced the Marine Corps into Special Ops.  It was mistake then and its a mistake now.  The Marine Corps can't afford the loss of talent or the disruptions this brings to the Infantry MOS.

On a side note, while the bean counters are out looking to slash the military in general, I'd love for someone to do a cost benefit analysis of Special Operations forces.  With a force of over 50,000 people in SOCOM, is it really the size that the nation wants and needs or should it be down sized.

31st MEU Boat Company Training.

KIN BLUE, OKINAWA, Japan-Marines with Company F, Battalion Landing Team 2nd Battalion, 7th Marine Regiment, 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, prepare to board the USS Tortuga during launch and recovery operations June 28. Once onboard the Tortuga, the Marines turned the boats around and returned to the water., Cpl. Anthony Ward Jr., 6/28/2011 2:59 AM

KIN BLUE, OKINAWA, Japan-A Marine with Company F, communicates with the USS Tortuga via radio as his boat heads through the surf to White Beach Naval Facility June 28. The Marines and USS Tortuga conducted launch and recovery operations to better equip the Marines for their job once aboard ship., Cpl. Anthony Ward Jr., 6/28/2011 2:25 AM

KIN BLUE, OKINAWA, Japan-The Combat Rubber Raiding Craft is the boat of choice for the Raiders of Company F. The Marines used the boats to conduct launch and recovery operations June 28., Cpl. Anthony Ward Jr., 6/28/2011 4:47 AM

The flip side of my call for across the board cuts in spending...including defense.

I'm not a Republican, I'm a conservative.  A conservative with libertarian leanings.

I've had many conversations with buddies and the general agreement is an across the board cut of 10% in the Federal budget with an accompanying freeze in increases for at least 10 years would be a good start to solving the deficit issue.

The problem with this type of thinking (my type of thinking) is the unintended consequences of such actions.  And there are alot of unintended consequences going on right now.

The President has called for even deeper defense cuts.  The services will respond with cutting people first then it'll start axing procurement...we're already seeing the groundwork laid for that.

The problem is....people build all those fancy widgets and if we act without full realization of those consequences then we could sink an already sick economy.

Exhibit number one from Defense News.

Lockheed Martin announced June 30 that it would eliminate approximately 1,500 jobs from its Aeronautics business. The cuts represent a 5 percent reduction in its workforce of about 28,000 employees located at sites in six states.
"We're taking what we think are bold and responsible actions given the defense environment," said Joe Stout, a spokesperson for the company's Aeronautics division.

The cuts come as part of a larger effort to curb costs and maintain affordability, Stout said.
"Our customers around the world are facing greater pressure, and we know we need to respond," he added.

Tomorrow the Dow Jones average will plummet.  What should an individual do?

My recommendation.

Keep it dry and stack it deep.  This (the economy) is going to get much nastier before it gets better.

Totally overblown nonsense.

Christian Lowe has an article over at Military.com that is completely overblown and I know he knows it.  I cringed when I saw the headline and then when I read the article, I knew exactly what it was.

IT'S THE ARMY SPECIAL OPERATIONS VERSION OF FEMALE ENGAGEMENT TEAMS.  A concept that the Marine Corps has been using for many, many months now.  Here's the kicker but read the whole thing.

So far, nearly 30 of the female CST Soldiers are deployed to the war zone, working in villages and towns that the commandos have cleared.
"They're supposed to be used on secure target areas," Sacolick said. "I don't want them fighting their way to a target."

I don't want them fighting their way to a target....Sacolick was playing it straight but Lowe took it over the top with his title..."Female Special Operators Now in Combat"....Lowe is better than this.  

Just the facts bro, just the facts.

Funny in a political way.

Morning Joe just got on my watch list.

If this is what the President's friends think then I'd hate to see what his enemies are saying.

Wow.

1,000th F-35 Flight.

Lt. Col. Leonard Kearl was at the controls for the 1,000th F-35 flight on 20 June 2011. The 1.8-hour flight, completed in F-35A AF-6, originated from Edwards AFB, California.

Wow.

Do I hear cries of agony from certain parts of Australia? 

Is a certain "Think Tank" (Air Power Australia) rethinking its positions???

Doubtful, but they should.

F-35B undergoes NERF testing.

NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND, PATUXENT RIVER, Md. -- F-35B test aircraft BF-4 rests the evening of June 21 after a day of testing at the Naval Electromagnetic Radiation Facility. BF-4 is undergoing testing which simulates the shipboard electromagnetic environment to identify any potential issues prior to at sea testing this fall on USS Wasp (LHD 1). The F-35B is the short take-off, vertical landing variant of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter for the U.S. Marine Corps and international partners and is undergoing test and evaluation at NAS Patuxent River prior to delivery to the fleet.

Pics of the day. June 30, 2011.

LA(Phot) Luis Holden won the Navy News Award in the 2011 Peregrine Trophy Photographic Competition with this image.
A Joint Force Harrier jet is pictured high over RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus shortly before the iconic aircraft was decommissioned.
Photographer: LA(Phot)Luis Holden

The Commandant General Royal Marines' Prize in the Peregrine Trophy 2011 competition went to LA(Phot) Si Ethell fora portfolio including this image.
The FSG (Fire Support Group) of Charlie Company 40 Commando Royal Marines, at FOB (Forward Operating Base) Jackson in Afghanistan engaging insurgents following contact at PB (Patrol Base) Paylae.
Photographer: LA(Phot) Si Ethell

Boy that was quick...

Haqqani leader who supported Kabul attack killed in precision airstrike

ISAF Joint Command- Afghanistan 2011-06-S-104 For Immediate Release KABUL, Afghanistan (June 30, 2011) – The International Security Assistance force confirmed today a top Haqqani network leader suspected of providing material support to the Kabul suicide bomb attack June 28, was killed in a precision airstrike in Gardez district, Paktiya province, yesterday. Ismail Jan was the deputy to the senior Haqqani commander inside Afghanistan, Haji Mali Khan. Jan and several Haqqani fighters were killed in strike. The Haqqani network, in conjunction with Taliban operatives, was responsible for the Tuesday night attack on the Kabul Intercontinental Hotel which killed 12 people, including a provincial judge. Jan also served as an insurgent leader in the Khost-Gardez Pass area, along the Afghanistan/Pakistan border, and moved into Afghanistan from Pakistan in late 2010. During this time he led approximately 25 to 35 fighters in conducting attacks against Afghan and coalition security forces. In addition to the hotel attack, the Haqqani network is responsible for several high-profile attacks, including the assassination of a long standing governor, Taj Mohammad Wardak. Wardak was assassinated in a massive explosive-device attack as he left his compound in September 2008. The security force tracked his location after receiving several intelligence reports from Afghan government officials, Afghan citizens and disenfranchised insurgents. After planning to avoid civilian casualties and mitigate collateral damage, the precision airstrike was conducted, killing Jan and several other insurgents. Afghan-led security forces have captured or killed more than 80 Haqqani leaders and facilitators since January, primarily in the Paktika, Paktiya and Khost areas. Initial reports indicate no civilians were harmed in the airstrike.

Anyway you slice it, its pretty darn impressive.

The attack was carried out on Tuesday and they track down the guy responsible already?

But one thing troubles me (and I admit that I haven't been paying attention to the players in Afghanistan) is this Haqqani network.  They seem to be more of a factor everyday.  Additionally they appear to be a bigger threat than the Taliban.

Is this a 3 way civil war with 2 sides teaming up to fight the central government??

Russian Marines.

English Russia has a fantastic photo spread on the Russian Marine Corps.  Check it out!

ISAF answers the OPSEC/Force Protection question.

The above photo has been circulating all over the internet after the recent attacks in Afghanistan.

In some of the photos the faces of the operators are blurred in others they're visible.

I was curious.  Were the images that weren't blurred wildcat...meaning unauthorized...or does ISAF not have any kind of prohibition on the images and its just something that a few bloggers are doing?

I wrote ISAF public affairs and got an answer.  The whole e-mail will follow but I want to break it down...

It started out very pleasantly...

Sol,
The photograph in question was taken by a member of the media at apublic location. As such ISAF has no control over how the picture waspublished. Some media outlets chose to blur the faces, others did not.That decision was made by individual editors with no input from ISAF.

Wow.  So in a nutshell we have our answer.  Its an individual decision by certain bloggers.

Now on the next part I have to admit that I was trying to be a bit clever and dropped the name of the rumored unit to see if the guy would bite and either confirm or deny it.

I can see him leaning back in his chair, grinning from ear to ear saying (cause I think he's British) "Not bloody likely you silly wanker"  and "You're barmy if you think that you can get me to slip up on classified material you silly berk"....

Anyway, I'm not up on British insults but you get the idea.  Here is the actual response.

As policy ISAF does not comment on Special Ops troops or operations.Additionally, any photos taken by the media while working with themilitary community are always checked before publication to ensureoperational security is not compromised.  
Regarding this specific photo, we have nothing further to comment.  
Regards,
Tim
TP JAMES - UK AOF-3Press Desk ChiefISAF JOINT COMMANDCOMBINED JOINT OPERATIONS CENTER

So long story short.  Operational Security/Force Protection is not violated by the posting of these heroes faces on the internet.

Until a valid reason to do so comes up then pictures like the ones above should be visible to everyone.  In the future these will be historic images of a forgotten war.  They shouldn't be saved for posterity with obliterated faces.

Just my opinion.

101st Airborne...hookin & jabbin & on patrol...

PAKTIKA PROVINCE, Afghanistan – Soldiers from Company C, 1st Battalion, 506th Infantry Regiment, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 101st Airborne Division, Task Force Currahee, pull security from the top of a mountain in Paktika Province during Operation Surak Basta III on June 23. The operation was to infiltrate near the Afghanistan-Pakistan border in order to stop enemy fighters from entering into Afghanistan. (Courtesy Photo)

PAKTIKA PROVINCE, Afghanistan – Soldiers from Company C, 1st Battalion, 506th Infantry Regiment, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 101st Airborne Division, Task Force Currahee, pull security from the top of a mountain in Paktika Province during Operation Surak Basta III on June 23. The operation was to infiltrate near the Afghanistan-Pakistan border in order to stop enemy fighters from entering into Afghanistan. (Courtesy Photo)

LAGHMAN PROVINCE, Afghanistan - U.S. Army Staff Sgt. Daniel Schumacher, an infantry from Dubuque, Iowa, with Company A, 1st Battalion, 133rd Infantry Regiment, leads a group of Soldiers from the town of Gomerai, Afghanistan, back to Combat Outpost Najil June 15 in Laghman Province, Northeastern Afghanistan. It was one of the final patrols of the deployment for Schumacher, who is wrapping up his fourth deployment. (Photo by Capt. Jason Beck, 210th Mobile Public Affairs Detachment)

LAGHMAN PROVINCE, Afghanistan - U.S. ArmyPfc. Elisha Bottleman, a machine gunner from Edgewood, Iowa, with Company A, 1st Battalion, 133rd Infantry Regiment, leads a group of Co. A Soldiers down a hill in Laghman Province, Northeastern Afghanistan, outside Combat Outpost Najil. (Photo by U.S. Army Staff. Sgt Ryan C. Matson, Task Force Red Bulls Public Affairs Office)

LAGHMAN PROVINCE, Afghanistan - U.S. Army 1st Lt. John Dundee, foreground, a platoon leader from Waterloo, Iowa, with Company A, 1st Battalion, 133rd Infantry Regiment, leads a group of his Soldiers up a hill June 15 outside the town of Dumlum, Laghman Province, Northeastern Afghanistan, outside Combat Outpost Najil. (Photo by U.S. Army Staff. Sgt Ryan C. Matson, Task Force Red Bulls Public Affairs Office)

What are the rules for OpSec?

I titled this "what are the rules for OpSec" but the actual question is "what are the rules for Force Protection".

Ya see, I've been reading accounts of the attack in Afghanistan and these photos have been splattered all over the net.

On some websites the faces are blurred and on others they're visible.  Sister sites at that.

If you know what ISAF rules for Force Protection and the publication of photos are I'd be thankful cause I'm beyond curious.  And I'm talking about real deal ISAF rules. 

Spanish and American Marine Conduct Mechanized Raid Training.

All photos by Cpl Dwight Henderson

Spanish Piranhas from 9th Mechanized Company, 3rd Mechanized Landing Battalion, line up to conduct a mechanized raid with Easy Company, Battalion Landing Team, 2nd Battalion, 2nd Marine Regiment, 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit, aboard Sierra Del Retin, Spain, June 25. The training was part of the Spanish Amphibious Bilateral Exercise, a 10-day exercise where Marines from 22nd MEU are training alongside Spanish marines to build relations and increase interoperability with the Spanish. The Marines and sailors of the 22nd MEU are currently deployed with Amphibious Squadron 6 aboard the USS Bataan Amphibious Ready Group serving as a flexible, formidable and potent force who continues to train and improve their capability to operate as a cohesive and effective Marine Air Ground Task Force. The 22nd MEU is a multi-mission, capable force comprised of an Aviation Combat Element, Marine Medium Tilt Rotor Squadron 263 (Reinforced); a Logistics Combat Element, Combat Logistics Battalion 22; a Ground Combat Element, Battalion Landing Team, 2nd Battalion, 2nd Marine Regiment; and its Combat Element.

A Spanish Piranha, right, from 9th Mechanized Company, 3rd Mechanized Landing Battalion, passes by an amphibian assault vehicle, left, with Easy Company, Battalion Landing Team, 2nd Battalion, 2nd Marine Regiment, 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit, during a mechanized raid aboard Sierra Del Retin, Spain, June 25. The training was part of the Spanish Amphibious Bilateral Exercise, a 10-day exercise where Marines from 22nd MEU are training alongside Spanish marines to build relations and increase interoperability with the Spanish. The Marines and sailors of the 22nd MEU are currently deployed with Amphibious Squadron 6 aboard the USS Bataan Amphibious Ready Group serving as a flexible, formidable and potent force who continues to train and improve their capability to operate as a cohesive and effective Marine Air Ground Task Force. The 22nd MEU is a multi-mission, capable force comprised of an Aviation Combat Element, Marine Medium Tilt Rotor Squadron 263 (Reinforced); a Logistics Combat Element, Combat Logistics Battalion 22; a Ground Combat Element, Battalion Landing Team, 2nd Battalion, 2nd Marine Regiment; and its Combat Element.

A Spanish Piranha, right, from 9th Mechanized Company, 3rd Mechanized Landing Battalion, passes by an amphibious assault vehicle, left, with Easy Company, Battalion Landing Team, 2nd Battalion, 2nd Marine Regiment, 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit, during a mechanized raid aboard Sierra Del Retin, Spain, June 25. The training was part of the Spanish Amphibious Bilateral Exercise, a 10-day exercise where Marines from 22nd MEU are training alongside Spanish marines to build relations and increase interoperability with the Spanish. The Marines and sailors of the 22nd MEU are currently deployed with Amphibious Squadron 6 aboard the USS Bataan Amphibious Ready Group serving as a flexible, formidable and potent force who continues to train and improve their capability to operate as a cohesive and effective Marine Air Ground Task Force. The 22nd MEU is a multi-mission, capable force comprised of an Aviation Combat Element, Marine Medium Tilt Rotor Squadron 263 (Reinforced); a Logistics Combat Element, Combat Logistics Battalion 22; a Ground Combat Element, Battalion Landing Team, 2nd Battalion, 2nd Marine Regiment; and its Combat Element.

Textron TAPV website & datasheet!

Ok, I'll share the good stuff.

Found the Textron TAPV website here.  You should check it out for more hi-rez photos and vids and general news of their entrant into the Canadian TAPV contest!

TAPV Datasheet 05-23-111

Turkey to place initial F-35 order.

Great find Phil!  Thanks buddy.

via Hurriyetdailynews.com

Turkey plans to buy the U.S.-led F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Lightning II, a stealth multirole fighter jet, to meet most future needs for its Air Force’s next-generation fighter planes. It has voiced willingness to buy around 100 F-35s over the next 15 years, but as the program’s limited production stage begins, it so far has not formally committed to the program. To do so, it needs to submit a purchase order for a first batch of six aircraft before the end of the year.“We will have talks [with the Americans] in the months ahead in an effort to resolve some matters. If we manage to reach an agreement, we expect to order the first six aircraft this year,” Murad Bayar, chief of the Undersecretariat for Defense Industries, or SSM, the government’s defense procurement agency, recently told the Hürriyet Daily News. “We expect to reach a deal.”

Read the whole thing but for critics of the F-35, the hits just keep coming.

Amy Butler (Wonder Woman) body slams over at ARES...

Oh this is getting good!

Amy (aka Wonder Woman) just stuck a fork in the conversation this morning.  Just to remind everyone, Sweetman posted this comment to her latest post...

Nothing confirms that the program is going tickety-boo like the second big management shake-up in seven months, bringing in a new deputy with no ties to Aeronautics, Fort Worth, Navair or USAF.

Hmm.  Rather bitchy on his part but still tame in my world.

Wonder Woman wasn't having it though and she laid the verbal smack down to Sweetman with this comment!

Clearly LM has chosen its leaders for this phase of JSF -- and potentially for the future of the company. Not sure it is the job of a journalist to spin this ...
One interesting point is to bring in some talent outside Aero may just be what was needed. Keep the sector bathwater drinking low may have been a goal. At any rate, in the past year or so, Dan Crowley is out, Lawson is in and the deputies have shifted. Burbage is still the anchor for the international program. Last year, the criticism was there was no leadership change at LM after Heinz was dismissed -- now the criticism is that there is a leadership change. Seems the spin is fickle at times. Either way -- this blog is intended to simply document the change.

Like I said, this is getting good. 

Amy verbally grabbed him by the throat, picked him up off the ground, told him to shut the fuck up and then body slammed him.

Awesome! 

Don't get up Bill.  Stay down!

Textron TAPV. The images.

Textron TAPV.

You have to wait for it toward the end of the video, but you'll see the Textron entrant into the TAPV contest.

More on the F-35C's carrier suitability testing.

Consider this a preemptive strike on the F-35C carrier suitability critics.

I think Sferrin states it best....

"With the F-14 there were two JBD issues:

1. Size. The JBD is much larger due to the launch position of the 14. The smaller JBD's didn't catch the full jet blast. The JBD for the 14 was wider and taller.

2. Heat. The JBD's designed for the F-14 had a greater water flow to them (1000 gpm versus 750) and, had their own dedicated firepump to provide that water rather than just using normal firemain. The retirement of the 14 solved this problem even though the modified JBD's remain in service on ships so fitted.

This was before they got the F110s.


For the F-35:

"One shipalt still in development concerns Flight Deck Jet Blast Deflectors (JBD). The Navy expects aircraft carrier JBDs will require some level of modification to accommodate F-35C heat plume concentration on the JBD. The Navy is currently collecting data from F-35 test aircraft to characterize the heat plume and signature of the JSF F-135 engine. The concentration of F-35C jet exhaust heat and plume differs from that of an FA-18E/F in physical location on the JBD, effects more JBD area, and may have a higher total integrated heat load. The goal of current analysis is to define the heat transfer to the Flight Deck and JBD components, determine the JBD system response, and develop a solution to mitigate the heat imparted by F-35C while retaining compatibility with the FA-18E/F. The solution must also ensure the mission of the JBD to protect the Flight Deck environment. These modifications will be incorporated aboard NIMITZ-class aircraft carriers during previously-scheduled availabilities. Modifications to CVN 78 will be accomplished during construction where possible, after finalization of a JBD system solution.
Several preliminary tests measuring the heat plume characteristics have been completed, funded by the F-35 Joint Program Office. Most recently, an angle plate test was conducted and the test results are being analyzed. Upon completion of this analysis, an F-35C will conduct high-power engine tests against a modified land-based CVN JBD. The cost and schedule to modify the test JBD will be dependent on the results of the ongoing analyses."

Long story short.

The testing is designed to find out issues, concerns and solutions to any problems when deploying a NEW airplane aboard a carrier deck.

I will not be surprised or discouraged if modifications and tweaks are needed to get the plane aboard ship (heck NAVAIR is even planning for it as we speak).

I will NOT be surprised when critics come out of the wood work to trumpet any findings as the end of the world.

Haters hate. 

Its all par for the course.