The LCS.
We have to look back a bit on this one.
The US Navy has suffered probably more than any service during this war on terror. Not from a deployment stand point (they've been as busy as ever), not from a personnel standpoint but from a "reason for being" standpoint.
The US Army and Marine Corps has been busy on land fighting our nations battles. The USAF has been in the air supporting those efforts...The Navy has been looking for a role. While looking for relevance during the past decade they lost sight of their reason for being...that is they forgot that the primary mission is to defeat our nations enemies at sea.
The LCS is suppose to fight the at sea version of counter insurgency.
It sounds good in theory...especially when you had Bush Administration officials talking about generational warfare. That theory gave way to a savage fact. Counter insurgency/nation building didn't work on land and its doubtful that it could work at sea.
Luckily for the US Navy, the situation off the coast of Africa provided a test bed for the sea borne version of counter insurgency with a mix of pirate and terrorist activity. Even without the LCS the tools were plentiful, the will to use them to effect lacking.
This all leads to my belief that the LCS is a ship without a mission.
In my scenario where the Carrier Battle Group was under attack, the LCS could play no role. At best it could steam to the scene and pick up survivors. That's all it could contribute.
And now the US Navy is about to build around 55 of these ships! Ships that add nothing to the Navy's combat power, can only show the flag and specialize in a mission set that has been abandoned. The Navy should dump this puppy today and focus on winning the nation's wars at sea. This should be fix number one.
Next. Fixing the airwing.

















