Friday, August 24, 2012

Law Enforcement shoots another vet...by mistake...



Thanks for the story Joe!

I don't get it.  Everyone wants to paint Law Enforcement and the US Military with the same brush and nothing could be further from the truth.

One thing is becoming obvious though.

There appears to be a war on veterans. 

Vets are being shot, arrested and generally (it appears) targeted by law enforcement.  Something has to give or this could get even more out of hand.

K-MAX Beacon-Enabled Delivery

Former Navy SEAL already getting death threats.


I knew this would happen.

But its this guys fault.  He outed himself when he wrote the book but perhaps more importantly he outed his buddies too.  Check this story out.

(NBC NEWS) Users on several militant Islamic websites affiliated with al-Qaida have posted the name and photo of a former Navy SEAL identified as the author of an upcoming book on the commando raid that killed Osama bin Laden. The posts called for his “destruction” in revenge for the al-Qaida founder’s killing.
Among the website publishing the death threats was the “Al-Fidaa” web forum, which al-Qaida uses to distribute its media and public communications, said Evan Kohlmann, an NBC News consultant and a terrorism analyst at Flashpoint Partners, a global security firm.
The source of the photo, which appears to show a special operations soldier in leveling an automatic rifle during a training exercise, was not immediately clear.
I wish I could feel sympathy.

I wish I could be worried for the guy.

But he brought this on himself.  Sorta like a middle class guy going into a dangerous part of the city to buy drugs or prostitutes.  If something bad happens he brought it on himself and can only blame himself for making a very bad decision.  Just like this Former SEAL did by writing this book.

CMC talks Amphibious Combat Vehicle.

via DOD Buzz.
Marine Corps Commandant Gen. James Amos didn’t mince words describing his commitment to the Amphibious Combat Vehicle and delivering the Corps a new amphibious tractor when speaking with reporters at the Pentagon Thursday.
“We need an amphibious tractor, period,” Amos said.
The Marine Corps four-star expects his acquisition team to finish the requirements for the ACV this fall and potentially submit a request for proposals to the defense industry. Amos read over the completed Analysis of Alternatives in June and remains optimistic the Corps will get its tractor. He received additional briefs on the ACV this week.

“We’re going to get one opportunity to do this right,” Amos said. “I want to make sure when we go to Congress with the requirement that Congress looks at it and says it makes complete sense to me and I fully support it. I feel like we are right where we need to be.”
Amos is understandably feeling pressure to deliver the Corps a new amphibious tractor. Their last attempt, the Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle, was notably canceled by former Defense Secretary Robert Gates as requirements spiraled and questions arose about just how far a Marine squad could travel from ship to shore.
The Marine Corps has its top scientists and engineers evaluating the ACV’s requirement’s down in Woodbridge, Va., and making decisions on cost tradeoffs to keep the tractor affordable, Amos said. A major issue remains the distance the tractor will have to travel ship to shore and whether it can get up on plane and travel over the waves.
If the transport doesn’t reach the necessary planing speed, then the Marines aboard must endure the choppy surf and the slow pace will make them a fatter target. However, with the additional speed comes a higher price tag.
“[The scientists] have been getting into the physics of fluid dynamics. How fast a vehicle can go before you have to have a planing vehicle. How big a motor you have to have. What’s the cost tradeoffs. They’ve been working on that for a little over a year-and-a-half,” Amos said.
Following the completion of the AOA, Amos said he wants his acquisition team to work with the engineers and re-evaluate the requirements one last time to make sure the requirements are “locked in concrete.”
He made sure to not make the same mistakes the Corps made with the EFV. Amos emphasized that the Corps is not interested in building a luxury tractor, he wants a fighting vehicle that can deliver a squad of Marines ashore for amphibious assaults.
“This is not a Cadillac Escalade we’re trying to build here,” Amos said. “This is a fighting vehicle that will come ship to shore and go in with likely a squad of Marines. We are trying to make sure we are not building something that ends up with capabilities that we don’t need or can’t afford.”
A couple of things concern me about this.  First the 800 pound Gorilla in the room is the US Navy.  Some type of agreement needs to be arrived at concerning how close to shore we can expect the amphibs to launch our assault vehicles.  Once that's determined ... and assuming that the full weight of firepower will be applied to the effort ....then we can decide exactly what the capabilities of the vehicle will be.

The second thing that concerns me is the location where the scientist are conducting these experiments.  If I recall correctly that's the Headquarters of General Dynamics.  I also recall them having some type of lab there.  If our people are working hand in hand with the guys from GD then we're going to have a protest for sure and the program will be set back again.  I'm sure they have that figured out but I just wanted to put that out there.

Another thing that annoys are some of the comments.  This one in particular.
 The Marines problem is that their basic amphibious unit is the battalion size MEG that has limited resources to support an amphibious assault. The hybrid EFV seemed to be an ideal answer. Of course the only problem, besides its $21-22 million per unity price tag and manufacturer incompetence was that the all aluminum vehicle was PRG bait.

What it appears is what the Marines news is a n amphibious taxi to bet the assault units ashore, the bring in the LAV-25's and M1A2's and the M-199's that are carried with the MEG and get their butts off the beach.


Oh wait a moment that Army doctrine.
This guy is smoking crack.  The MEU is a battalion sized unit that's self sufficient for 15 days in combat.  No other formation of that size in the US military can say the same.  Additionally the USMC is tailor made for multiple environments but especially the Pacific.  The silly crack about Army doctrine is just sour grapes.  The Pacific is an Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps play land.  The Army will have to find a rationale for inclusion in war planning.  I've been trying to figure out a role for that force and just can't find it.  Their best hope is to garrison Afghanistan and perhaps parts of Africa for the foreseeable future if they want to claim relevancy.

Australia to acquire EA-18G Growler







UPDATE: SOFREP does NOT give a pass...

Just a note.

Head over to SOFREP to read their latest article.

THEY DO NOT GIVE THE SEAL IN QUESTION A PASS.  Consider me impressed.  I actually thought that since they're a Special Ops Centric website (like I focus on the Marine Corps) that they would cut the guy some slack.  Especially when you consider that they have many Navy SEALs writing for the website.

I stand corrected.  SOFREP played it straight.  Kudos.

NOTE:  I forgot to link to the post on SOFREP.  Click here to read it for yourself.

The Terrapin 8x8. Marine Personnel Carrier's Pappy..

Name a World War 2 vehicle that had the same specifications as the Marine Personnel Carrier that's wheeled.  You could name the DUKW but that would be a misnomer.  It wasn't designed transport men in the assault, it was and is a logistics vehicle.  The LVT? Nope, its tracked.

You would have to point to the Briish Terrapin8x8. It laid the groundwork for the modern amphibious 8x8 fighting vehicle.  Although it wasn't successful because of certain design decisions it did play a major role with the Canadians in the fighting in Northern Europe.

Read about the Terrapin here.

Thursday, August 23, 2012

Lieutenant General John F. Mulholland, Jr. Is he man enough to save SOCOM?


SOCOM is in disarray.


If you follow military matters they've been going bad for quite a while now.  You had the cluster that was the SEAL movie.  People played the patriot card and laughed and said it was good fun.  Then you had McRaven speaking to  every news outlet that would hear him...you had McRaven ask Congress for world wide Combatant Commander powers (that kind of power would make him the most powerful person in the US military...SOCOM would be answerable to no one and missions could have theoretically been run inside the US if the Admiral saw fit) and now you have a SEAL way off base writing a tell  all book about a top secret operation.

Even if no secrets are spilled he gave up the most important thing of all.  His identity.  With that little tidbit and a google search, enemies of SEAL Team 6 can not only trace him and his family down, but they can also locate other team mates of his.  

Yeah.  SOCOM is in shit shape right now.

Let me ask you this.  If you had a top secret mission that needed to be run right now would you pick Navy SEALs or would you opt for another SOCOM unit?

I would opt for another unit.  Especially if I was concerned about news of it getting out.

Lucky for SOCOM, there is a man of with experience, courage, ability and perhaps most importantly the humility to take the reigns and steer the organization back to what it was always suppose to be.
  
I don't expect it right now (although it couldn't hurt) but I can see General Mulholland taking over early next year...right after the elections.  Remember the General in S. Korea that talked about missions being run in the North?  A few months later he was relieved of duty.

The same will happen with this.  I don't know what's wrong with the SEALs but the culture appears to be broken.  Something is off with that outfit and I can't quite put my finger on it. 

The only question that needs to be answered is this.  Is General Mulholland man enough to save SOCOM from itself?

$250,000 to BAE for AAV Upgrade Study?

via DefenseAerospace.
“BAE Systems has worked successfully with the U.S. Marine Corps for more than 70 years, and we’re proud to continue being a part of programs that will revolutionize the amphibious fleet,” said Ann Hoholick, vice president and general manager of Amphibious & New Programs for BAE Systems. “It is our goal to design a family of systems that incorporates low-risk, mature technologies that are scalable to align with emerging requirements and funding.”

The AAV trade study will allow BAE Systems to propose how to best improve the survivability and force protection of the vehicle while maintaining its current land and water mobility characteristics. Through this $250,000 contract, BAE Systems will determine if an affordable development and production unit cost can be realized using a production schedule that fields 43 upgraded vehicles by September 2017.
Hmmm.  The Vice President of Amphibious & New Programs for BAE Systems is bieng a bit coy in her description of working with the Marine Corps for 70 years...unless she's counting FMC's work (BAE bought them out). But whats interesting is the production schedule and the amount of money allocated.

They're looking to have this done by 2017 which puts it smack dabin the iddle of MPC production.  THey also have a paltry sum of 250,000 grand to do this study.  That tells me that BAE is probably doing this on their own dime.  I can't lie to you.  I'm cheering for BAE on this one.  They have too many inovative projects out there...have lost on some projects on questionable reasoning and its time for a break through.

Quite honestly I'd love to see BAE offer new build AAV's with increased firepower, speed (land and water) and crew protection.

That'll be tough to do with only a quater million dollars seed money.

Japanese AAVs?



Interesting.  If the Japanese are actually looking to buy AAVs then that would make them the second country in less than a month that's shown interest in the vehicle (the first is Brazil).

This puts the AAV upgrade/ACV development in a totally different light.  IF the Japanese are interested then the AAV upgrade/ACV programs will probably merge.  This could be just the kind of news that the Marine Corps needs to help save its vehicle programs AND a bit of money.

The only thing left is to solve the doctrine issues.  Why do we need MRAPs in storage and JLTVs?  If we need JLTVs then why are we only replacing a portion of the HUMVEEs with them instead of replacing all of them?  If we're upgrading the AAV, developing the ACV then why do we need the MPC? If we need the MPC then why develop the ACV and upgrade the AAV?

We're spending money without a plan as to why.  This is why I say Marine Corps procurement is jacked up.

Uncle Jimbo goes hard against the author of the Bin Laden tell all.

Wow.  Check this out from Black5..
One of the SEALs from the bin Laden raid has apparently written a book about the operation.
The book, titled “No Easy Day: The Firsthand Account of the Mission That Killed Osama bin Laden,” was written by a former SEAL team leader who the publisher said was “one of the first men through the door on the third floor of the terrorist leader’s hideout.”
He uses a pseudonym, but I know his name and it will likely come out shortly. The bottom line is that doing this makes you a douche of epic proportions. There was whining about how former operators were pointing out that leaks about classified ops were hurting our security. They were called unprofessional, which was unfair. They were not giving out info, they were saying that the giving out of info was a dangerous thing This jackass is going to spill the details of the raid so he can cash in.
Dear Loser,
Enjoy the money, you are now dead to all the rest of us.
Cordially,
Everyone else from the Special Ops community
I said it once and I'll say it again.  Special Forces especially but the rest of SOCOM too, won't be putting up with this SEAL self promotion vibe they have running through that community.

This incident is going to give the SEALs a very bad name in the rest of the Special Ops Community and the fallout hasn't quite hit yet.

NOTE:
I just realized something after re-reading Uncle Jimbo's post.  This Navy SEAL has probably put himself, his family and other members of SEAL Team 6 in danger.  If this guys name comes out and UJ thinks it will, then it will be a pretty easy matter of back tracing his steps and finding out the names of other guys.  Maybe not directly but by some good internet searches, a little leg work and determination.  And you can bet that AQ will want to kill the men that performed this mission.  Even if they don't someone around the world probably has an axe to grind. I wonder if this guy realizes the shit he's started.

Don't blame the SEAL, blame the publisher!


Brandon Webb over at SOFREP has a weird take on the author of the tell all book about the Bin Laden raid.  A few tidbits before he changes the article to make it sing better....
Our opinion is that the publisher at Penguin clearly had no concern for National Security or Operational Security (OPSEC), or they would have not published this book. Should publishers have more accountability? We say yes.
(My Comment:  You have got to be shitting me.  The publisher is wrong but the author gets a pass?  Bullshit)
+

The Internet and social media has created a world where headlines live and die depending on who’s first to Tweet about it.  It’s something that is causing major headaches in the US Special Operations community.
“The Admiral (SEAL) has locked down all media projects until further notice”- A SEAL Master chief recently told SOFREP.
(My comment:  Too damn late.  McRaven was told by an old time Special Forces General to get out the media.  He laughed at the guy.  Bet he ain't laughing now)

One thing is becoming apparent from the outside looking in.  The SEALs might be the rock stars of the Special Ops world but they're gonna pay a price for all this.  The whole community is. 

Royal Navy Type 45 destroyer HMS Daring


Wednesday, August 22, 2012

USMC. Procurement Doomsday Is Here.


Check out this story from Reuters.

The Marine Corps' decision to proceed with training flights amounts to a vote of confidence in the embattled F-35 fighter program, which has been restructured three times in recent years, slowing production and delaying the plane's operational use.
Marine Corps leaders, increasingly concerned about replacing their current fleet of aging fighters, decided to skip the formal evaluation of the plane's operational utility that the Air Force is completing before proceeding with its own pilot training flights at the base.
Don't be fooled.

Part of this is about the F-35 but most of it has to do with a procurement doomsday that is here now and only going to get worse.

The Marine Corps needs to start clearing the books on some projects....wonder why?  Check out all the programs that the Marine Corps is running now....

*F-35
*AH-1Z
*UH-1Y
*MV-22
*KC-130J
*Marine Personnel Carrier
*AAV Upgrade
*Amphibious Combat Vehicle
*CH-53K
*JLTV
*Internally Transportable Vehicle
*MTVR
*KMAX UAV
*LAV-25 Upgrade

And those are the things that I remembered off the top of my head.  Those are all major programs being done at the same time with the prospect of budget cuts, not increases!

Then notice how many of those programs are big dollar aviation projects.

By rushing the F-35 into the field, they'll essentially wall off the money, will tie in defense jobs to the planes production and will be able to play the old game of asking for supplementals to replace the ancient ground equipment.

Still.  Look for the JLTV to be cancelled (the Marine's buy anyway), expect the AAV upgrade or the ACV to compete for defense dollars...we'll do one but not both and finally (and I hope I'm wrong) but look for the CH-53K to get pushed further out.

The trainwreck is here for the Marines.

JLTV downselect winners.


Thanks for the link Jonathan!  Wow.  Read the entire article but BAE lost AGAIN!  I don't know whats going on.  They seem to have solid designs yet can't catch a break in these selections.

via DefenseNews.
The U.S. Army and Marine Corps have selected three vehicles for the Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) phase of the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) program, with the announcement coming Wednesday evening.
The awards were somewhat surprising, since two of the three went to companies that submitted their designs in March, as opposed to bidders who had been working on the program since its inception in 2005.
The awards went to AM General, ($64.5 million); Lockheed Martin ($66.3 million); and Oshkosh Corporation, ($56.4 million). AM General and Oshkosh are the new bidders.
In a notice posted to a government contracting website, the Army said that the firm-fixed price contracts cover the 27-month EMD effort, and that “approximately $99.5Mwas obligated for the three contractors by this action, with initial funding of approximately $28M to $36M for each contractor. The balance of the funding, up to full base contract amount, will be provided in FY 13 and FY 14.”
The Army says that it plans to purchase 50,000 vehicles, while the Marine Corps is looking to buy 5,000.
The three industry teams who won technology development contracts in October 2008 included BAE Systems and Navistar; General Tactical Vehicles (General Dynamics and AM General); and Lockheed Martin and BAE Systems.
But on March 28, Navistar left the BAE-led team to offer the Saratoga Light Tactical Vehicle, and AM General and Oshkosh both announced they were also striking out on their own to submit independent bids.
The announcement today — barring a protest — shuts out original TD winners BAE Systems and General Dynamics, as well as newcomer Navistar.
Just plain wow.

General Dynamics seems to be mailing it in lately when it comes to these contests (I mean really?  How could they think that the Duro Eagle could compete...they didn't even design a new vehicle!) and the BAE loss just has me stumped.  I can't wait to read the rationale behind this decision.

Oshkosh

Lockheed Martin

Have the US Navy SEALs lost their fucking minds???

via Soldier Systems.
We recently posted a video entitled, “Dishonorable Disclosures” by a group named OpSec that was making a case that the Obama administration had been releasing details of special operations for political gain. Their timing couldnt have been worse. We knew that a major book was on the horizon (and they should have to) by a bin Laden raid participant so we were a bit cautious about the whole politicized thing. Since the OpSec group is headed by SEALs it would surely make them look kind of foolish if an even bigger leak came out by a fellow SEAL. Well, now that book has been announced. According to a report by ABC News, “The book, titled “No Easy Day: The Firsthand Account of the Mission That Killed Osama bin Laden,” was written by a former SEAL team leader who the publisher said was “one of the first men through the door on the third floor of the terrorist leader’s hideout.” See the ABCNews story for details on the upcoming book by “Mark Owen.”
While we are certainly looking forward to reading the book, we hope that the group OpSec will attempt to maintain their legitimacy by also working to educate the public on any damage that this book might cause. Here’s your chance to do the right thing guys.
Man I hope this is all a false news story.

I HOPE IT IS!

If it isn't then someone needs to get that community together and tell them to knock it off!  I'll never forget when Admiral McRaven was told by an old time retired Special Forces General to get out of the news media.  The Admiral laughed at him.  I bet he isn't laughing now.

Special Operations always complains that Big Army or Big Navy or Big Whatever always gets in the way and keeps them from operating the way that they would like.

If shit like this keeps up you can bet that Special Operations will be snatched back again....and just think...a few months ago McRaven wanted Combatant Commander status to deploy his forces world wide!

Golani Brigade at the Golan Heights (Namer APC in action)







Nineteen Flights In One Day

F-35s were in the air across the nation, from Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in New Jersey to Edwards AFB in California, on 13 August 2012. Two aircraft launched from Edwards; four from NAS Patuxent River, Maryland; three from NAS Fort Worth JRB; and nine from Eglin AFB, Florida; and one from McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst for a total of nineteen, which set a record for the F-35 program. The previous record was seventeen flights on 8 August. Of the nineteen flights, five were CTOL and seven were STOVL.

UltimateRatioReg nails General Dempsey.

UltimateRatioReg nails General Dempsey!

Its a great read and I recommend you head over to USNI Blog to check it out. 

This is AWESOME. 

Only a few writers are able to give voice to the majority of military people...Black5, UltimateRatioReg, CDR Salamander and a few other spots (a very few) still have their heads on right.  But the pushback is coming and I can't wait to read the comments that are coming.

Know your enemy. ZBD09 Wheeled Infantry Fighting Vehicle.




The ZBD09.

It appears to be a Mowag Piranha copy.

But that isn't what should be of concern to Western military planner or thinkers.  While it almost certainly doesn't have the same armored protection and is probably a rough copy of a Western design, what should concern all is how fast the Chinese are able to get new vehicles into the hands of their military. What should concern the USMC is that the Chinese already have a wheeled personnel carrier that meets (at least on paper) the exact specifications laid out for its MPC without the drama thats part of our procurement process.