Saturday, March 26, 2022
Soldiers conduct reconnaissance training in the Donnelly Training Area, Alaska for JPMRC 22-02
Top Russian military leaders repeatedly decline calls from U.S., prompting fears of ‘sleepwalking into war’
via Washington Post.
Repeated attempts by the United States’ top defense and military leaders to speak with their Russian counterparts have been rejected by Moscow for the last month, leaving the world’s two largest nuclear powers in the dark about explanations for military movements and raising fears of a major miscalculation or battlefield accident.
My two cents.
The Biden Admin along with NATO has put in place sanctions that appear to be designed to destroy Russia.
NATO has "reinforced" its border nations with thousands of troops (even though we have had no intelligence stating that Russia was planning on making a push into ANY NATO country).
On top of the current sanctions the Biden Admin along with NATO has sought to "double down" on those sanctions even though the risk of world wide recession/depression or worse, deflation is increasing as is the worry of various pop up wars across the planet.
A looming fuel crisis is about to grip the EU and is hammering the American public as we speak. A food crisis of almost biblically proportions is looming for the people of the Middle East/Africa with outrageous prices for staples coming to the rest of the planet.
AND YET!!!!
The Pentagon expects their counterparts in Russia to pick up the phone and say hello? To work with them to deconflict?
Is everyone in DC smoking crack?
The risk is high.
We have numerous forces operating CLOSE to the Ukrainian border.
Missiles are flying all over the place. The risk of an accident happening (a missile going off course and striking NATO troops) is beyond high. Quite honestly its becoming more probable the longer this goes on.
Yet someone in DC expects for normalcy with regard to high level contacts to continue? Our SecState is NOWHERE TO BE FOUND, yet the Pentagon expects to somehow play warrior and diplomat in this major league contest of wills?
This seems simple to me.
Biden needs to stop posturing and get on the damn phone and get involved instead of the name calling. He's soft as cotton but trying to be tough while people die.
Physical courage (for real men) is easy. Moral courage isn't.
Biden is lacking in both regards.
Friday, March 25, 2022
Concealed Carry Self Defense....an example
I've been trying to find the background on this but my Google-foo is weak. Anyone know? It's damn near viral on gun websites.Gun rights are women’s rights.
— Some Welder 🇺🇸 (@SomeWelder) March 24, 2022
pic.twitter.com/NVBpobmmCt
These Raw Nude Photos Will Remind You Every Body Is Beautiful (follow the link if you dare!...note this is sfw!)
This is just wrong.These Raw Nude Photos Will Remind You Every Body Is Beautiful https://t.co/CA7JXcx9xN pic.twitter.com/Qgfi9EE5dz
— Cosmopolitan (@Cosmopolitan) April 6, 2016
America’s ‘Unipolar Moment’ is Over .
via Real Clear Defense
It was a time of celebration--the 45-year Cold War was over. The West, led by the United States, had won. The Soviet empire collapsed. China, our de facto ally at the end of the Cold War, appeared to be foregoing communist ideology in favor of economic growth produced by a relaxation of state control over the economy. There was an element of hubris involved in proclaiming the end of a multi-polar world or suggesting that history had ended. Victory sometimes breeds hubris. And hubris can be dangerous.
-----
As President Reagan's U.N. Ambassador and trusted adviser, Jeane Kirkpatrick was one of the intellectual architects of our victory in the Cold War. But Kirkpatrick was not blinded by hubris when the Berlin Wall fell. In the fall of 1990, she wrote an article in The National Interest suggesting that the United States should become a “normal country” in the post-Cold War world. She warned U.S. post-Cold War policymakers against pursuing a “mystical mission” that reached beyond the Constitutional requirement to protect the nation's vital national security interests. Specifically, she wrote that the United States should not devote itself to establishing democracy around the world. She derided the notion that the conduct of U.S. foreign policy should be "the special province" of elites who too often do not pay its costs or bear its consequences. Such elites, Kirkpatrick warned, often develop "disinterested globalist" attitudes couched in high-minded terms such as "internationalism" instead of focusing on concrete U.S. national security interests.
Read the whole thing here. I could basically highlight the entire article it's so good.




















































