Tuesday, June 21, 2011
I.D. and the lost Navy FireScout.
ID wrote an article early (and I mean it posted early...like around 1 or 2 am) about the US Navy losing the narrative battle to the USAF in regards to the Air-Sea Battle. Read it here but a few snippets.
Two problems occurred. First, unmanned aircraft development for the Navy in particular got sidetracked when the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq began wearing down F-18s faster than the Navy expected, and due to political pressure from Congress, not to mention practical problems with rapidly aging airframes, the Navy ended up having to spend a great deal of the aviation budget on replacing F-18 Hornets instead of innovating new unmanned aircraft. Second, the Littoral Combat Ship mission modules that focused on unmanned vehicles ran into serious development problems that have led to a complete restructuring of the mission module programs. Many of those technologies could not meet requirements, and as a result Navy leadership spends a great deal of time in public speeches emphasizing the necessity for mission power capacity to support new technologies like unmanned underwater vehicles.
The Navy doesn't have a Hornet replacement of any type ready to field today, and while a lot of investment in both the Joint Strike Fighter and the UCAS offers possibilities; these systems lack a narrative that overrides the uncertainty surrounding the programs. What will be the capabilities and limitations of both platforms, and will they compliment each other effectively has hoped? What does future ISR look like when surface combatants and submarines field unmanned systems, and what does the Littoral Combat Ship bring to the total battle network? Will these complicated emerging networks of systems be both reliable and credible, or will the network requirements be too vulnerable to stress and disruption in the future warfare environment to make many of these technologies useful?I don't know if the G man had word of the shoot down before I did, but one thing is certain.
He nailed it. The article is a little wordy and he goes into issues that focus on the Big Navy, but as far as UAV's and the Surface Navy is concerned, he nailed it.
This first combat deployment of rotary winged UAVs (I'm assuming US Navy warships) is a disappointment. At least in my eyes.
It also brings up a couple of interesting questions.
1. Are rotary winged UAVs more vulnerable than fixed winged UAVs?
2. Was the flight profile adequate? Did its mission profile place it in danger of being lost or is it more fundamental?
3. Is the idea of armed rotary winged UAVs an evolutionary dead end?
4. For naval warfare --- do manned helicopters just make more sense? MH-60's can be had for a song...should we dump the fashion of UAVs and concentrate on what we know works?
I don't know but the loss of this FireScout...for whatever reason...does not bode well for the future of these vehicles.
Gettin' ready to kick some Police/Firefighter ass! All in good fun of course!
 |
Marine gives pep talk before fight
Lt. Col.
Shane Tomko, Special Purpose Marine Ground Air-Ground Task Force
commander with 3rd Battalion, 24th Marine Regiment gives words of
encouragement to one of his Marines, Lance Cpl. Chris Williams, 22, a
radio operator with the reserve battalion, before his fight at the
"First to Fight" amateur boxing tournament. At this tournament, Marines
and St. Louis police and firefighters go toe-to-toe at the Scottstrade
Center in St. louis, June 20 with all proceeds benefitting Backstoppers,
Semper Fi Foundation and Toys for Tots. Marine Week provides an
opportunity to increase public awareness of the Marine Corps' value to
our nation's defense and to preserve and mature the Corps' relationship
with the American people. Photo by Sgt. Jimmy D. Shea
|
The PM is pissed!
via Defense Management.
The truth always gets out.
The truth is just as the Sea Lord stated. NATO is struggling. NATO is overstretched and its future is in doubt.
Wow.PM rebukes forces chiefs over Libya
21 June 2011Prime Minister David Cameron has hit back at forces chiefs' warnings about the strain being placed on Britain's armed forces.
In recent weeks the heads of the Royal Air Force and Royal Navy have warned that Britain would struggle to maintain operations in Libya beyond September due to the difficulty in refreshing personnel and equipment in both Afghanistan and Libya.
When the First Sea Lord repeated his warning recently he was said to have been called to Downing Street for a 'dressing down' by the Prime Minister.
Today it emerged that Air Chief Marshal Simon Bryant warned MPs that allowance cuts had affected morale and that the RAF was 'running hot' in terms of the demand on its personnel and airframes.
Confronted with today's news, Cameron told a press conference: "There are moments when I wake up and read the newspapers and think 'you do the fighting, I'll do the talking'."
"…Time is on our side, not Gaddafi's. We are allied to some of the richest and most militarily capable countries in the world. We have the Libyan people on our side and we'll keep going.
"The pressure is turning up all the time: you can see that in the desertions from his regime, the pressure on the west of the country, the pockets of resistance that people had assumed would be snuffed out are growing in strength.
"Britain's military are performing magnificently."
The truth always gets out.
The truth is just as the Sea Lord stated. NATO is struggling. NATO is overstretched and its future is in doubt.
Remember a bridge too far? This is a war too strenuous for an out of shape military alliance with delusions of grandeur.
MH-60R Helo Heads Down Under
Old news but good news.
Australia is about to get an advanced, capable, and cutting edge helicopter....now. Not in the next 10 years.
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)