2nd Land Army????

The US Marine Corps has made a terrible mistake.

You don't adopt the language of your critics when you're trying to re-orient yourself to another mission.  Take for example this 2nd land army talk.

OUR NATION NEEDED THE USMC TO SERVE ON  LAND FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME.  THAT DOES NOT MAKE US A SECOND LAND ARMY!

The leadership at HQMC is deficient.  They're so fucking joint.  So damn politically correct, that they've adopted the language of our critics.

Pitiful, pathetic and something we need to fix.

USMC Assault Breacher Vehicle in action - Afghanistan

Found my next truck...

AEV Brute.  Its a conversion so that gives me pause...Jeep was suppose to be introducing these type vehicles but hasn't pulled the trigger yet..so..time to start saving.  Check it out here for yourself.

Does the thought of lower defense budgets have you down? No problem, simply militarize American police depts!

via Jalopnik
The title is tongue in cheek.  Well a little tongue in cheek anyway...check out Alpine Armoring website for more details.

AMERCAL 2011 ...the video

Info needed (beyond Google searches)...USAF Red Horse...

U.S. Air Force Airmen from the 820th RED HORSE airborne flight, parachute into a drop zone from a C-17 Globemaster III Oct. 15, 2011, at Nellis Air Force Base, Nev. RED HORSE and 6 CTS Airmen perform airdrop missions to stay current on training and certifications, enabling them to perform jump missions and operate their own drop zones. (U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Taylor Worley)

Great photo and the caption has me curious.  Do these guys deploy?  How are they used in theater?  Do they make use of these skill sets?  Did they build the UAV base in Ethiopia?

Interesting skill set and one that would appear to be in demand...especially further inland.  The USAF version of SeaBees?

USMC and the JLTV.

“It must be light enough to leverage the flexibility and capacity of amphibious shipping, yet heavy enough to accomplish the mission. Larger than special operations forces, but lighter and more expeditionary than conventional Army units, we must be able to engage and respond quickly – often from the sea – with enough forces to carry the day,” the report stated. “The imperative for the Marine Corps is to preserve capabilities developed since 9/11, expand our engagement efforts, respond to crisis and still be able to project power for the most dangerous threat scenarios.

With the above statement describing the Marine Corps of the future then how do we justify buying the JLTV?

The Commandant recently talked about belt tightening...how does buying this vehicle help us do that?

We have more MRAPs in inventory than we know what to do with.  If IEDs are a threat to our forces then we'll need to get them out of storage...even the MATV is too light to deal with many of them and its still heavier than the JLTV.

So tell me how it makes sense for the Marine Corps to buy 3000 of these vehicles?!

Time to activate the Marine Corps super power...