Monday, February 21, 2011

AAV Replacement RFI is coming.


Defense News has info on the upcoming RFI on the AAV Replacement.  Pretty heady stuff.  Follow the link to read the whole thing but here are the basics.

* The ability to autonomously deliver a Marine infantry squad from an amphibious ship to shore a minimum distance of 12 nautical miles, at "a speed to enable the element of surprise in the buildup ashore." The notice acknowledges that a high rate of speed "may prove to be unaffordable."
* Protection against direct and indirect fire, mines and improvised explosive devices. The protection can be modular, "applied incrementally as the situation dictates."
* Employ open architecture principles to rapidly integrate new technologies, and be reconfigurable to carry out alternative roles, including operation of heavy mortars or rockets, and logistic or medical evacuation missions.
* Be powerful enough to engage and destroy similar vehicles, provide direct fire support to dismounted infantry and maneuver with M1A1 Abrams main battle tanks.
If General Dynamics were smart, they'd just redo the EFV without hydraulics and moving treads and just toss the de-teched version at the Marines.

As a matter of fact I wonder why they are even opening this up to bid---single source it and get the simplified vehicle into the fleet.

4 comments :

  1. another round of endless bullshit....

    ReplyDelete
  2. "a speed to enable the element of surprise in the buildup ashore."

    Well that's a fuzzy requirement; that means it has to be faster than the AAV7 - and that's about as fast as conventional AAVs/APCs go - which is not nearly fast enough for a surprise assault.

    An EFV variant without the expensive high-speed kit seems the smart road as it would retain the vetronics and 30mm, but rebuilding the hull (with a V-hull and what not) means a total redesign which may not be cheap at all.

    ReplyDelete
  3. these really sound nebulous to me too?!
    Let's hope there is more detail in the RFI, though I tire of readying those docs easily - sigh~

    I am still in favor of a two-part system, i.e. a AIFV for land ops and a Fast Landing Craft to lift them ashore, along the shore but not necessarily up the shore. IOW the Marines need to look real hard at whether they want a lot of good land vehicles and some LCACs aka SSC, or the price tag will be a killer.

    ReplyDelete
  4. They could buy the Chinese vehicle.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.