Thursday, September 29, 2011

A CNO I can deal with...

Sorry guys but the last CNO rubbed me the wrong way...as does the outgoing CJCS.  I can't put an exact finger on it but they both appeared to be more politician than war fighter.  I don't know how the next guys will turn out but at least the new CNO is saying the right things.  Here's a tidbit from ID.  Go there to read the whole thing but this section caught my attention.
Guiding Principles

The starting point for developing and executing our plans
  • Our primary mission is warfighting. All our efforts to improve capabilities, develop people, and structure our organizations should be grounded in this fundamental responsibility.
  • People are the Navy’s foundation. We have a professional and moral obligation to uphold a covenant with Sailors, Civilians and their families * to ably lead, equip, train and motivate.
  • Our approach should be Joint and combined when possible. However, we own the sea, and must also be able to operate independently when necessary.
  • Our primary Joint partner is the U.S. Marine Corps. We must continue to evolve how we will operate and fight as expeditionary warfare partners.
  • At sea and ashore, we must be ready to part with Navy roles, programs and traditions if they are not integral to our future vision or a core element of our mission.
  • We must ensure today’s force is ready for its assigned missions.
  • Maintaining ships and aircraft to their expected service lives is an essential contribution to fleet capacity.
  • Our Navy Ethos defines us and describes the standard for character and behavior.
  • We must clearly and directly communicate our intent and expectations both within and outside the Navy.
  • I believe in the “Charge of Command.” We will train and empower our leaders with authorities commensurate with their responsibilities.
Its a little preachy.

Too wordy.

But this guy almost sounds like a grunt.

I like it.

1 comment :

  1. One of his points of interest is where he states "We must be ready to part with Navy roles if they are not integral to our future vision". To me this speaks of a man that is willing to change if it is in the best interest of the Navy. Not someone that is going to stick to their guns no matter the consequences.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.