Sunday, November 09, 2014

SPMAGTF-CR about to get killed in the crib?


via Information Dissemination.
“And the important goal that we're trying to wrestle with right now under intense budget pressure is to get the proper mix between the forces that are forward presence forces and those based in the United States and our U.S. territories, which are our surge forces. That's what we're trying to do…

…So simply put, something has to give. Maintaining our military at such high tempo in this resource-constrained environment is simply no longer sustainable. Period. End of story. It prevents us from properly preparing for future contingencies across the full spectrum of conflict. Now, that is what wakes me up at night, because ultimately preparing the joint force to win wars is what the department does. It is what we are charged to do.
Read the entire article here.

Everyone knows my take on SPMAGTF-CR's.  They're simply an attempt to highlight the MV-22, push the idea of more command slots for the aviation side of the house AND an attempt at legacy building by Amos.

Let's be clear.  When first formed, the idea of Company Landing Teams at the end of a 1000 mile supply chain, relying on V-22's for supplies, MAYBE Marine Corps Harriers, USAF F-16's/A-10's/F-15's, hopefully Navy aviation for close air support and being stuck in bad guy land for 3 days or longer was a recipe designed to have Marines arrive back home in body bags.

But to hear Deputy Sec of Defense Bob Work...a former Marine...start talking about forward deployed forces...and my take on his speech is that he's insisting that we be smart about it....just makes me wonder.

Are we about to see SPMAGTF-CR's killed in the crib?  God!  I hope so!

1 comment :

  1. I think about every 5 years, one branch or another trots out the latest version of a "quick reaction force" that is lightly armed, unable to do sustained combat, let alone against a heavy conventional threat. One of the things the DepSecDef mentioned in the link is how that many potential enemies are building their conventional forces, while we are basically stuck in counter-insurgency mode. (my choice of words but that was the feeling I got reading the link.)
    Thing is, even against groups like ISIS we are seeing more conventional battles alongside terror tactics.
    We don't all need to be commandos. The Marines are an elite force, but they are an elite conventional combined arms force. They are not snakeaters fighting behind the lines like Army special forces.. Sure, they can do it, and do it well, but only at the expense of their primary mission. They are the Fist that punches you in the face, not a finger that taps you on the shoulder.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.