Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Monday, January 23, 2012
VMM-365
Monday Mud Balling.
I'm sure you remember the raid on Bin Laden. I had the sudden revalation that the "Secret Stealth Blackhawk" resembled the Comanche in many ways. That also led to the idea that on the raid into Pakistan everything was there except for gunships. No Little Birds. No Apaches. No Super Cobras. As a matter of fact the only aircraft that accompanied the raid according to sources was were a pair of CH-47's that stayed on the other side of the border. I mean seriously if there was ever a need for the Direct Action Penetrator version of the Blackhawk then this would have been that mission.
Unless.
Unless there was another airplane along that provided that type of support. Just mud balling but would the 160th have a transport helicopter without some type of armed gunship? Keep in mind that gunship would have to share the same stealth characteristics as the stealth transport or it wouldn't make sense.
A quick Google search didn't reveal much but there is no answer on what happened to the RAH-66 prototypes. Wikipedia is unclear as to whether or not 5 or 16 examples were built before the program was cancelled but is it possible that the RAH-66 or a modified Apache is the missing aircraft in this scenario?
We got news that Panetta fully supports 11 aircraft carriers. Good news for the Navy but which part? More speculation on my part but watching videos this weekend, I was amazed at one that showed an F/A-18 being waved off because crewmen were on the landing area of the airplane as it was on approach.
I don't know if they're building that kind of flexibility into UAVs operating off aircraft carriers but if they aren't then you're looking at one of the most dangerous work places in the world becoming even more dangerous. Add to it the fact that I have yet to read how they plan on integrating UAVs onto the decks of aircraft carriers (plenty of info on how they'll be utilized...plenty on how they could even be controlled by strike fighters and such but nothing on how they'll fit in the mix on the deck of a carrier0, and it has me once again wondering if the possibility of an all UAV carrier might be in the cards. It would make ultimate sense in my mind because you would be able to establish unique handling drills for those airplanes. Unique operating procedures for mishaps etc.
Naval air might be in for a shock. In the end a carrier or two might end up under the control of the Surface Navy. Consider it a re-imagined arsenal ship.
Sunday, January 22, 2012
Helocasting...Recon Style....
USMC and Naval Safety Center caught in a lie?
Joe sent me this story (thanks buddy) and although it dates back from last year I somehow missed it. Its written by David Axe for Wired and its compelling. READ it!
Quite honestly I despise the spokesman's account of the incident as not being a "serious flying accident."
They're playing word games.
Its cute if you're a guy and girl playing a dating game.
Its acceptable if you're a low life lawyer or Congressman (well not really but lets say expected).
Its totally unacceptable if you're a US Marine. Higher standards and all that other jazz.
We (the USMC) need to get our house in order. This is sad. Pathetic. Unacceptable. And how this didn't get bigger air time is beyond me.
On March 27, 2006, at a Marine Corps air base in New River, North Carolina, an MV-22 assigned to Medium Tiltrotor Training Squadron 204 experienced an unplanned surge in engine power as the three-man crew was preparing for a flight. “That caused the aircraft to inadvertently lift off the deck approximately 30 feet,” Marine spokesman Maj. Shawn Haney explained. “It came back down … there was major damage sustained to the right wing and the right engine.”Quite honestly I didn't like the way David characterized a potentially life threatening situation as a joy ride...but I get it. He was probably frustrated at the insanity of it all.
Luckily, the three crewmembers were unhurt. The cost to repair the self-flying Osprey totaled $7,068,028, according to the Naval Safety Center, which tracks all Navy and Marine aircraft mishaps. An investigation by the Navy and manufacturers Bell and Boeing resulted in tweaks to the V-22′s engine controls.
Yet the Marines and the Naval Safety Center ultimately decided that the Osprey’s dangerous joyride didn’t count as a serious flying accident, known in Pentagon parlance as a “Class A flight mishap.” The reason, said Capt. Brian Block, a Marine spokesman: The aircraft wasn’t supposed to take off just then; therefore, it’s not a flight problem. If a V-22 suffers damage while preparing to launch or after landing, or if the crew does not explicitly command the aircraft to take off but it does anyways, then the accident doesn’t count as a flight accident.
Quite honestly I despise the spokesman's account of the incident as not being a "serious flying accident."
They're playing word games.
Its cute if you're a guy and girl playing a dating game.
Its acceptable if you're a low life lawyer or Congressman (well not really but lets say expected).
Its totally unacceptable if you're a US Marine. Higher standards and all that other jazz.
We (the USMC) need to get our house in order. This is sad. Pathetic. Unacceptable. And how this didn't get bigger air time is beyond me.
Archetype. The best short Sci-Fi film I've seen in years.
You know a short film is good when it has you wanting to see more. You know its great when you sit through the credits cause you want to see who the actors, directors, producers etc...are. Archetype is that kinda film for me. Check it out!
A Canadian Journalist slams the UK.
I was doing my regular web searches and ran across this article. To say that I was shocked is an understatement. This is via the Vancouver Sun. Read the whole thing....its sad and if true, then our friends across the pond have some serious troubles that I never began to fathom.
I look forward to hearing British readers weigh in on this one. I just don't know.
Britain's constant boast that it punches above its weight internationally rings more hollow by the day. The defence ministry is eviscerating the Royal Navy and Royal Air Force and making deep cuts to the army, too. There have been sweeping redundancies across all three services, the sudden retirement of the fleet of Harrier jump jets, the premature retirement of the aircraft carrier Ark Royal and the likely immediate sale to raise cash of one of two carriers now being built. Even after the current round of Draconian cuts, it is difficult to see how Britain can sustain the force that will remain, let alone underwrite plans for a new generation of nuclear submarines, new frigates and the new F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.I don't know if his critique of the Ministry of Defense is adequate. As a matter of fact, at least a couple of procurement issues can be traced back to 'urgent requests' that were rubber stamped without proper vetting. What I mean by that is this...it appears that the UK tried its best to make sure that its troops were properly equipped--no matter what the costs.
That Britain can no longer even pretend to be a major global player was already obvious to its troops and allies in Iraq and in Afghanistan. Well-trained, brave soldiers from fabled regiments went into battle under-equipped because the British treasury no longer has enough money to pay for the kit required for expeditionary escapades. While, for example, Ottawa gave Canadian troops in Kandahar whatever they urgently required, from boots to state-of-the art command posts, helicopters and safer armoured vehicles, British troops often have had to make do with gear that sometimes looked as if it had seen service against Rommel's Afrika Korps - and in a few cases, may have actually been used in that war.
Much has been made lately of Britain's decision to opt out of a new European financial treaty that tried to rescue the continental economies because the other EU states refused to grant London's financial institutions special status. Britons of ``the wogs start at Calais'' school celebrated Prime Minister David Cameron's intransigence as they did earlier British decisions to keep the pound instead of the euro and to maintain a totally separate set of immigration and customs checks than their neighbours across the English Channel. The almost universal European response to Downing Street's latest act of isolationism was to say ``good riddance.''
I look forward to hearing British readers weigh in on this one. I just don't know.
Saturday, January 21, 2012
Lava Viper 2012.
Friday, January 20, 2012
Marine Aviation = 1...Critics = 0....
via CBS News via the AP
FORT WORTH (AP) — A U.S. defense official says Defense Secretary Leon Panetta is giving fresh backing to the Marine Corps’ version of the next-generation fighter jet, the F-35.This is more about the partner nations than it is about the Marine Corps. Canada, the UK, Australia, Japan and others have been nervous about the airplane being canceled. This news should chill them out.
The F-35, which is developing Navy and Air Force variants, is the Pentagon’s most expensive weapons program. It has faced delays and other problems that raised doubts about its future.
During a visit Friday to a naval air station in Maryland, Panetta will announce that the Marines’ version of the Fort Worth-built joint strike fighter is no longer on what Panetta’s predecessor, Robert Gates, called “probation.” That’s according to a U.S. defense official who spoke on condition of anonymity in advance of the announcement.
Gates announced one year ago that if the Marines’ version of the plane had not overcome its problems within two years he would attempt to cancel it.
Thursday, January 19, 2012
CH-53 down in Afghanistan.
Just heard on a radio that a CH-53 went down in Afghanistan in Helmand province. Its unknown (more precisely they aren't saying what caused the crash) what caused the incident, but all 6 people on board were killed. This from ABC News via AP...
Rest in peace to the fallen and comfort to their families.
A NATO helicopter crashed in southern Afghanistan on Thursday, killing six members of the international military force, the U.S.-led coalition said.
The coalition said in a release early Friday morning that there was no enemy activity in the area at the time of the crash in southern Afghanistan.
The cause of the crash is still being investigated. The coalition did not disclose the nationalities of those killed.
The helicopter crash occurred on the same day seven civilians were killed outside a crowded gate at Kandahar Air Field, a sprawling base for U.S. and NATO operations, after a suicide attacker set off a vehicle laden with explosives. The Taliban claimed responsibility, claiming they were targeting a NATO convoy.
It was the second suicide bombing in as many days in southern Afghanistan, officials said. The coalition said no NATO troops were killed. It does not disclose information about injured troops.
Rest in peace to the fallen and comfort to their families.
VMFAT-501 gets another bird...
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)