Saturday, October 12, 2019
This is why China will prevail against us...(UPDATED)
I'm old enough to remember when the Pentagon was drawing down in the Middle East to focus on China and Russia. https://t.co/8cWAt7eoQv— Aaron Mehta (@AaronMehta) October 11, 2019
Drink it in boys.
You're seeing the seeds of failure being sown right in front of your eyes.
We were suppose to pivot to the Pacific. We has supposedly recognized the threat that is China.
Yet we continue to engage in that tarbaby known as the Middle East.
What have we gotten for the last 20 years of our involvement?
* Lives of our fellow countrymen either lost or their bodies horribly mangled.
* Untold billions, maybe trillions of dollars wasted on foreign infrastructure, training forces that inevitably fail again and again, and those same foreign nationals begging for more of the same.
* Last but not least we've wasted our national strength, eroded faith in the military, in general lied to the American public and sullied our reputation as a warfighting force around the world.
We keep pumping resources into a failed project.
What makes a good business man? He knows when to stop sinking money into a project that will not provide a return on his investment.
We're far beyond that point with the Middle East. We're being bled slowly while our competitors gain ground.
When we lose to China you'll see historians point toward our failed efforts in the Middle East as one of many reasons why.
(Note. Reading some of the comments it appears that people are skipping over the part where I say this will "one" of reasons future historians will say we failed. You can add a whole host of other issues to the plate. Failed economic policy. Failed trade. Failed regulation of TERRIBLE business practice. Failure to solve our budget issues/deficit spending. Out of control focus on myriad social issues. Massive bloat in the Pentagon. Failed defense procurement. The list goes on...)
I had hope that we were finally getting our heads out of the ME sands and were finally going to get ready for the future.
I was wrong.
We're giving the Chinese perfect victory. Forget attacking us. Forget us keeping them bottled up in the Pacific. On the course we're on the Chinese will win without having to fire a shot. Assuming of course they already haven't (which is a big assumption given the behavior of our so called domestic corporations with regard to their behavior toward the Chinese govt lately....I wonder who they actually fear...the US or Chinese govt...if you said US then you should be drug tested).
Friday, October 11, 2019
Modify this and you have an instant HQ MEF-Forward on wheels...
Instant home 👌pic.twitter.com/fYUDANBNsD— CCTV IDIOTS (@cctv_idiots) October 11, 2019
Yeah. This would be nice if it could be modified into a Command Post for a MEF-Forward. Even a fully stocked Trauma Hospital.
We're talking about being modular right? About being expeditionary right? Well considering all the comms and encryption gear, not to mention the reality of computers an old fashioned in the mud setup ain't gonna cut it anymore.
As much as it might pain some, we need to put our Command Element in proper conditions so they can lead the fight right.
Besides its on wheels so we can pickup and move it. Additionally with the CH-53K coming online it shouldn't have a problem flying it to shore.
Another impression of the Bell 360 Invictus Attack / Reconnaissance helicopter
Another impression of the Bell 360 Invictus Attack / Reconnaissance helicopter. Note four Hellfire / Brimstone missiles carried internally and eight externally. The chin-mounted weapon is a 20 mm cannon. pic.twitter.com/AooWh63q1C— Nicholas Drummond (@nicholadrummond) October 11, 2019
USS America - LHA6 in work ups..
The aviation-centric #amphibious assault ship USS #AMERICA LHA6 working up 8 Oct off the Southern California coast carrying 13 #Marine Corps F-35B #JSF Joint Strike Fighters of VMFA122. The ship will transfer this fall to Japan pic.twitter.com/yYnR4FOdJo— Chris Cavas (@CavasShips) October 11, 2019
Did Senator Graham really admit this to Russian Prankster's playing the role of a Turkish Minister?
NOTE! The article is from Russia Times but apparently they sourced it from Politico.
via RT.
Republican Senator Lindsey Graham was the latest to fall victim to Russian prankster duo “Lexus and Vovan,” who, posing as a Turkish minister, tricked the lawmaker into admitting his ‘sympathy’ for Turkey’s ‘problem’ with Kurds.Story here.
Believing he was on the line with Ankara’s defense minister, Hulusi Akar, the South Carolina senator emphasized Washington’s desire to lure Turkey away from the S-400, a Russian-made missile defense system, with promises of a lucrative trade deal with “unlimited” potential. Politico obtained audio of the call, which took place in August.
“I want to make this a win-win if we can,” Graham told the so-called minister.
I don’t want to impose sanctions on our ally Turkey; I want us to move toward a free trade agreement. … The problem with the S-400 is that if Turkey activates it, other people want to buy it, and that’s really going to put pressure on our alliances. We’re pretty firm about that.
Graham has previously warned Ankara of penalties if it activated the S-400 systems purchased from Russia over the summer, and more recently introduced a bill in the Senate that would sanction Turkey over its military offensive against Kurdish fighters in Syria, however during the call the senator took credit for restraining his fellow Republicans.
“I’ve convinced my Republican colleagues to stand down,” he said, adding later: “the reason we don't have sanctions now is because I’ve helped President Trump ... say ‘no.’”
The senator also appeared to undercut his recent statements on Turkey’s incursion into Syria, telling the phony minister he wanted Washington to “make sure that Turkey is protected from this threat in Syria,” and that he is “sympathetic to the YPG problem.”
The public is in the land of mirrors here. The funny room the media has us all locked into belies the reality of what we've seen (assuming you've been looking) over the past year or so.
Additionally the truths that are being said behind closed doors are never spoken about in public.
The American public is being handled like the ancient Romans handled their Plebeian Mobs.
via PBS.
Rome’s working class, the plebeians had little individual power. Grouped together, however, they became a Roman mob and had to be handled carefully.Drink it in and weep.
----------
The Emperor Augustus was well aware of this risk and was keen to keep the poorest plebeians happy enough and reasonably well fed so that they would not riot. He began the system of state bribery that the writer Juvenal described as ‘bread and circuses’.
Free grain and controlled food prices meant that plebeians could not starve, while free entertainment – such as chariot races and gladiators in amphitheaters and the Circus Maximus – meant that they would not get bored and restless. Bribery it may have been, but it often worked.
We, the American people, are being handled like a Roman mob.
Russia conducting high speed tests on production Boomerang 8x8 IFV...
Looks like #Russia is conducting high speed tests of what looks like a production variant of the Boomerang IFV.#OSINT #IFV pic.twitter.com/TdeDlT4HpZ— Petri Mäkelä (@pmakela1) October 11, 2019
Thanks China! You proved what a lie Corporate Activism really is...for that I'm grateful...
Corporate Activism
Corporate activism is a public stance taken by a major company to positively impact social change or legislation. In some situations the activism might be driven by a desire for a company to reach a specific audience or demographic who purchase their products. In other situations the owners and leadership within a company may use their personal social influence to support a particular cause
It's kinda weird.
China has done us all a favor. They've either killed, severely limited and/or humiliated the concept of Corporate Activism worldwide.
The funny thing is that from my chair only one entity has successfully stuck up the middle finger to the Chinese (South Park) but I have no idea on how or even if that will affect their bottom line.
Blizzard taken down.
NBA throat stomped.
Apple in the corner whimpering like a battered dog.
Others like Google, GM, Ford, Boeing, AirBus, Sikorsky, Dell, Nike (the list goes on) are hoping and praying to the Almighty God that no one notices them and that no one demands them to take a stand.
Speaking of which.
We have the reality of Corporate Activism.
It isn't about pushing social issues. It's about making money and virtue signaling.
Money is the real mover. If Hong Kong was richer than China or even a bigger potential market then I would expect them same corporations to be lobbying Congress to alert the 25th ID, 1MARDIV and probably a few more to secure the place. If it was lucrative enough we'd probably add that to the list of places we'd spend 100 years occupying.
General Butler was right.
They're not worth more than the Chinese market. So they will be left out on a limb.
Repeating myself but the Chinese did us a favor. They exposed Corporate Activism for the lie that it truly is...for that I'm grateful.
Corporate activism is a public stance taken by a major company to positively impact social change or legislation. In some situations the activism might be driven by a desire for a company to reach a specific audience or demographic who purchase their products. In other situations the owners and leadership within a company may use their personal social influence to support a particular cause
It's kinda weird.
China has done us all a favor. They've either killed, severely limited and/or humiliated the concept of Corporate Activism worldwide.
The funny thing is that from my chair only one entity has successfully stuck up the middle finger to the Chinese (South Park) but I have no idea on how or even if that will affect their bottom line.
Blizzard Suspends Hearthstone Pro Player Blitzchung For Supporting Hong ... https://t.co/W3gYp0tTB0 via @YouTube— Mark Jeremie (@CryingFre) October 10, 2019
Blizzard taken down.
Listen....@dmorey does NOT speak for the @HoustonRockets. Our presence in Tokyo is all about the promotion of the @NBA internationally and we are NOT a political organization. @espn https://t.co/yNyQFtwTTi— Tilman Fertitta (@TilmanJFertitta) October 5, 2019
NBA throat stomped.
Breaking News: Apple pulled an app that let Hong Kong’s protesters track the police, a day after facing intense criticism from Chinese state media https://t.co/ZEQUAmWkYn— The New York Times (@nytimes) October 10, 2019
Apple in the corner whimpering like a battered dog.
Others like Google, GM, Ford, Boeing, AirBus, Sikorsky, Dell, Nike (the list goes on) are hoping and praying to the Almighty God that no one notices them and that no one demands them to take a stand.
Speaking of which.
We have the reality of Corporate Activism.
It isn't about pushing social issues. It's about making money and virtue signaling.
Money is the real mover. If Hong Kong was richer than China or even a bigger potential market then I would expect them same corporations to be lobbying Congress to alert the 25th ID, 1MARDIV and probably a few more to secure the place. If it was lucrative enough we'd probably add that to the list of places we'd spend 100 years occupying.
General Butler was right.
"War is a racket. It always has been. It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small 'inside' group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes."The problem for Hong Kong protesters?
They're not worth more than the Chinese market. So they will be left out on a limb.
Repeating myself but the Chinese did us a favor. They exposed Corporate Activism for the lie that it truly is...for that I'm grateful.
Thursday, October 10, 2019
Subscribe to:
Comments
(
Atom
)