Saturday, August 22, 2020

Think Defence asks "Is it time to bring back the medium bomber"? Hell yeah it is!!!!



Make sure you read his article (amazing that this has been talked about for more than a decade), but the answer is HELL YEAH IT IS!!!

The problem?

The various services have been beset by mafias that have tilted the field in terrible ways that we're only NOW starting to see the consequences of.

Aviation has wrecked the Marine Corps and now its reforming itself into an abomination in order to make what it has work.  Which means an even greater disturbance in force structure (couldn't help the Star Wars reference).

For the Navy its coming to terms that instead of being an asset, carrier Navy is close to becoming an hindrance instead of a war winning construct.

For the Air Force?  It's the fighter mafia, the surrender forced on the old Strategic Air Command (in their case I guess it was a bit more understandable because bombers held sway for so long), and the imbalance in their force structure that has left them short ranged.

In essence it makes no sense for the USAF to be fielding thousands of tactical fighters but no capable medium bomber.

We need a solid capable modern version of the B-25.  Something with long range, fast, can fly high and launch missiles at distance.  I would aim for speed of high subsonic but it would need to be able to do Mach 1 in a "dash".  Additionally it needs to be able to roam far and wide.  Avionics from the F-15EX and those that WORK from the F-35 would be nice to have too.

Engines would be off the shelf and nothing fanciful (again I'm looking at the F-15's set) and stealth would be limited, not a goal but stealth reduction where possible (and affordable) would be pursued.

But what about the B-21?  Its another one of those hold over projects that no longer applies.  For better or worse Generals are gonna have to wrap their brains around the fact that "manned" aircraft will no longer be penetration platforms.  That will be left to robots/loyal wingman.  Which means that another expensive stealth platform isn't needed.  Quite honestly they'd be smarter to focus on building in a secondary electronic warfare function into my mythical bird. Carrying the Navy's EA-18 next gen jamming pods as a matter of everyday life would be a nice force multiplier and since I see a three man crew which would include an Electronic Warfare Officer it makes sense!

That's my idea.  What's yours?  Is this dead on arrival?  Is TD (and ME!) wrong?

Lazar 3 - 8x8 armored combat vehicle



At Army Recognition...here.

Curious thing.  This vehicle (at least previous models) had been listed as MRAPs.  I guess its really not an issue though.  Many vehicles that would have previously been listed MRAPs are now considered full on combat vehicles.

I wonder what the real distinction was/is?


Sprut-SDM1

Thanks to S300V4 for the pic!

- Mountains, seas, different climates - optimised
- Engine, trasnmission, networking capability from BMD-4M and BMP-3
- net-centric module integrated
- updated FCS, blah blah
- 125mm gun
- 500km range
- Swims, of course (up to 3 grade)

Expeditionary Sea Base ship HERSHEL "WOODY" WILLIAMS ESB4 in the Med...

Big Navy is so inconsistent with its classification/naming conventions that I no longer pay attention to them. First the L-Class bullshit, then this? Add to it the idiocy with naming ships after politicians and shit? Just give them class & numbers like most navies, and limit it to battles/war heroes. This modern day fuckery? I'm not with it! PLEASE NOTE!!!!! THIS SHIP IS PROUDLY AND APPROPRIATELY NAMED! SPEAKING ON RECLASSING IT FROM MLP TO ESB!!!





Two weeks of Turkish military embarrassment against Greece

Note.  I find this "conflict" puzzling.  We're talking about two modern countries yet instead of being able to settle these disputes at the negotiating table all we're seeing is increased tension (what's the difference between them and the US vs. China...they're allies!).  The rhetoric on the blog between these two sides is also a bit irritating.  But it's Saturday so I post this to stir the shit.  If you can't put out a fire then you add gasoline, grab some popcorn and sit back and watch the fuckery...

Bold Claim! XVIII Airborne Corps has the largest combined arms mix with the greatest variety of combat power within the Department of Defense.



Hmm.  I've got to take a look at all their units/formations.  Pretty bold claim from my seat.  Could it possibly be true?

CH-53K Integrated Test Team stretches King Stallion’s sea legs




Here.

Czech Army is the launch customer for the Lynx KF41...and they're apparently building a family of vehicles...

Note.  This is late but apparently the Czech Army is building a family of vehicles based on the KF41 Lynx.  Awesome.  Curious about operating cost of this beast though.  The Czech's will have a capable medium weight force that can flex up and down the spectrum, provide superb armored protection, substantial firepower and a credible defense against everyone but the most powerful of nations.  Well done.  Below are pics of the various variants.





Sidenote.  Has anyone noticed that masts or mast-lites are making a comeback with recce vehicles?  I have and I think I know why.  Those small UAVs that everyone has flocked too are expendable, fragile etc...Additionally everyone and their mother is developing countermeasures to them.  I believe their time in the sun has come and gone.  A more robust system that can survive more than one or two encounters is needed.  In comes mast systems. It allows a see first shoot first capability that will survive much longer than those small uavs.  You pay the price in reduced range but its obviously been deemed acceptable.  That's my theory at least.

Open Comment Post. 22 Aug 2020


Danger Close

True Collaboration 3 - Episode 7: Gripen’s Weapons

Bell V-280 Valor - Commitment to the Mission