The Pentagon is trying to clear the table so that they can push modernization. A couple of ongoing occupations of hostile countries isn't good for accomplishing that mission. The problem? The Pentagon might be done with the Middle East but I don't think its done with us.URGENT:
— RT (@RT_com) April 7, 2021
US agrees to withdraw 'remaining combat troops' from Iraq – reports
STORY: https://t.co/ZS7KyaRQrc pic.twitter.com/PfOyckAKKC
Wednesday, April 07, 2021
We might be done with the Middle East but I bet it ain't done with us...
California Women's Prisons just became even more nightmarish for its inmates...
— Disclose.tv 🚨 (@disclosetv) April 7, 2021
"Azimuth" check on the Commandant's planning guidance? Not possible and that's by design...
"The backbone legacy capability in a ground combat scenario is the tank. Precision fires are not a substitute...The only thing that can tip the scales in close combat is armor-protected firepower." #TankTuesday @tsouthjourno https://t.co/B1IJ2Q2NlF
— John Spencer (@SpencerGuard) April 6, 2021
It's behind a firewall now but I had a chance to read and just plain wow! It seems that the tribe is waking up but its far too late.
Tuesday, April 06, 2021
Chinese aircraft carrier and her escorts pass Okinawa on their way to the Pacific...
Chinese aircraft carrier and 5 ships pass Okinawa on way to Pacific - the Liaoning goes to sea for a little stretch of her conventional legs and a flap at her wings. Does it matter? Yes - but let’s qualify this news. A thread, short-ish: https://t.co/8ZhcpuL5go
— Alessio Patalano (@alessionaval) April 6, 2021
Will the USMC change course?
It can't.
Berger's plan is shock and awe. Its moving fast and shedding current combat power by design.
He's moving fast even though circumstances were bound to change because he's made the same mistake that all transformationalist make. They're so sure of their plans that they implement change that fails to take into account changing events that affect the organization.
Additionally his goal requires a reduction in boat spaces. If he is to pay for his goal without additional funding then Marines have to be dismissed from the service.
Costs will skyrocket so you can bet that the floor won't be 150K Marines. My guess is that in order to keep this plan within current funding it'll have to dip closer to 100K Marines.
Additionally the USMC is becoming aviation heavy.
Two platforms are going to continue to gobble up the Marine Corps. The F-35 and the CH-53K.
My prediction is that you'll see two things. A reduction in the buy of both and an increased reliance on Army aviation (with a serious node to "integrating" Navy rotary/tilt wing assets) to make up for the gap.
The Chinese reacted.
They've already jacked with Berger's concept and I'm sure more is to come.
The New Missile Marines aren't gonna cut it in the future conflict and we're stuck with the force design for the next 20 years.
Let's hope war doesn't come...and if it does its not a fight for the survival of the nation.
Subscribe to:
Comments
(
Atom
)