Saturday, August 08, 2020
HMLA-169 conduct a Defense of Amphibious Task Force for Trident Storm
Hmm. Two things. Where was this simple (and often suggested solution on this blog) for dealing with Iranian gunboats? Ya know the reason for being for the LCS! Lastly does this mean that we can see the rebirth of Navy helicopter attack squadrons (forgot what they were called in Vietnam but they did some serious work).
Five Chinese Type-071 LPDs....my personal calculations have the Chinese Navy eclipsing the US Navy by 2030!
Thanks to Filippo for the pic!
This blog has been so focused on Marine Corps Force Design 2030 that we've missed the real story.
The US Navy is about to be eclipsed by the Chinese Navy.
Let that sink in.
Back of the napkin figuring has me thinking that by 2030 the Chinese Navy will AT LEAST equal the US Navy in the number of surface combatants and will probably exceed them.
I'm not talking about frigates and below either.
I'm talking Burke Class and above!
Is this the real reason behind the move to join the sea battle? If it is then Berger should have been clear instead of leaving this important part of the discussion unsaid.
If this theory (my grade school calculations) is correct then are we doing enough? More importantly is the NAVY!
Of course this still makes one wonder why we aren't pushing Marine Air to contribute more to the sea fight if this is the case. Half of our fighter attack squadrons can rededicate to the sea fight without loss of ground combat power and we could still maintain a credible ground combat element.
But this theory does explain why Berger's gone so hog wild.
![]() |
| click on pic to expand..panoramic! |
This blog has been so focused on Marine Corps Force Design 2030 that we've missed the real story.
The US Navy is about to be eclipsed by the Chinese Navy.
Let that sink in.
Back of the napkin figuring has me thinking that by 2030 the Chinese Navy will AT LEAST equal the US Navy in the number of surface combatants and will probably exceed them.
I'm not talking about frigates and below either.
I'm talking Burke Class and above!
Is this the real reason behind the move to join the sea battle? If it is then Berger should have been clear instead of leaving this important part of the discussion unsaid.
If this theory (my grade school calculations) is correct then are we doing enough? More importantly is the NAVY!
Of course this still makes one wonder why we aren't pushing Marine Air to contribute more to the sea fight if this is the case. Half of our fighter attack squadrons can rededicate to the sea fight without loss of ground combat power and we could still maintain a credible ground combat element.
But this theory does explain why Berger's gone so hog wild.
Army's first laser battalion
The Defense Department expects to stand up its first battalion of Stryker vehicles outfitted with high-powered laser weapons by sometime next year, Army officials say.Wow. The US Army is on it's SHIT! I love the moves they're making. Evolving the force instead of seeking radical transformation.
“Expect to have the first battalion fielded in 2021 with four battalions by 2023,” U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command chief Lt. Gen. Dan Karbler told the audience at the virtual Space Missile Defense symposium on Tuesday
The so-called "laser battalion," as Defense One described it, would eventually deploy the new 50 kw Directed Energy-Maneuver Short-Range Air Defense (DE-MSHORAD) Stryker that the Army is working to field by 2022, a ten-fold power increase over the 5 kw-class system that artillery soldiers have been testing in Germany since early 2018.
Defense contractors Northrop Grumman and Raytheon are currently competing to manufacture the new laser system, with plans for a "shoot off" between the two prototypes at Fort Sill in Oklahoma sometime in May 2021, according to Breaking Defense.
A platoon of four laser Strykers prototypes will end up in the hands of an actual combat unit sometime in 2022, according to Breaking Defense, with the laser system integrated into the vehicles' existing hardware as soon as this December.
They're doing it right!
Remains of missing Marines, Sailor successfully recovered
via DVIDS
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON, Calif. – The remains of seven Marines and a Sailor were successfully recovered Aug. 7, 2020, after underwater salvage operations following the July 30 mishap involving an amphibious assault vehicle off the coast of San Clemente Island.
The recovered Marines and Sailor will soon be transferred to Dover Air Force Base, Delaware, for preparation by mortuary affairs teams for burial. Marine and Navy pallbearers will place the remains aboard an aircraft bound for Dover AFB in a solemn transfer. From Dover AFB, their remains will then be released to their families in accordance with their wishes.
The transfer of remains will not be open to the public, and we ask that the privacy of the families be respected as they make final arrangements for their loved ones.
“Our hearts and thoughts of the 15th Marine Expeditionary Unit are with the families of our recovered Marines and Sailor,” said Col. Christopher Bronzi, commanding officer of the 15th Marine Expeditionary Unit. “We hope the successful recovery of our fallen warriors brings some measure of comfort.”
The U.S. Navy has led the underwater search and salvage efforts. Specialized equipment on a diving and salvage ship to recover the remains and AAV arrived Aug. 6 to relieve the crew of HOS Dominator, who stayed in position after locating the site.
Lance Cpl. Guillermo S. Perez, 19, of New Braunfels, Texas, also died in the AAV mishap and was pronounced dead at the scene July 30. His remains were transferred Aug. 5 to Dover AFB.
The sunken AAV has been successfully recovered. The cause of the July 30 incident is under investigation.
Well at least they got this done. God bless the families of the fallen.
Exercise Deep Water 2020 Air Assault
If you're doing a platoon sized raid of course you're gonna grab the nearest SEAL Team or Special Forces Unit.
If you're doing company and above who would be your choice? Would you reach for a few from the Ranger Bns? If its an Air Assault would you reach for some bubbas from the 82nd or 101st? Hell if its Air Assault why not the 10th Mountain or 25th ID? Why would you choose Marines? Would you choose Marines?
My point is that this isn't special. Air Assaults are ordinary. Airfield seizures are ordinary.
Everyone does it now.
When was the last time you heard Marine Corps leadership talk about seizing a port?
When you start doing what everyone else is you're ordinary, not unique...not special.
Combined Anti-Armor Team 1, Battalion Landing Team, 2nd Battalion, 4th Marines, 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU)
Is the additional weight, height and limited mobility really an upgrade over the HUMVEE? I don't think so. Mobility is king if you can't have enough armor to shrug off enemy hits. We haven't taken a good look at the JLTV on these pages, but if you want to see a vehicle built for the last war, here it is. The plan to keep MRAPs in storage for use if needed was a better plan than to try and build it into our utility vehicles.
Friday, August 07, 2020
UAVs are gonna be flying around like flies on future battlefields...
The level of innovation from Israel is just amazing‼️‼️— Vayu Aerospace Review (@ReviewVayu) August 7, 2020
SpearUAV has unveiled Ninox – a Unique Encapsulated Drone System for Instant ISTAR Capabilities
Immediately launched, the encapsulated drone system provides an on-demand, on the move, instant drone intel capability
1/2 pic.twitter.com/VEzgWfAMhG
We're gonna need something a bit more effective than kinetic solutions to the future UAV threat. With companies developing lightweight, truly manportable UAVs, the danger is real not imaginary.
When you have a single platoon that can have every swinging dick and ovary carrying their own personal UAV then you have a problem for you or your enemy (whoever happens to be so equipped).
What has me spinning is this realization. Armor will have to readjust on the fly (pun intended). The previous threat was IEDs all over the place. I'm betting the future it'll be UAVs. That means that either we develop some type of CIWS for almost EVERY vehicle or we develop a system that can effectively protect a dispersed platoon.
The 21st Century. The hits just keep coming.
One Clime, One Place, One Enemy....the Missile Marine Corps to end rotations to Norway
via Stars & Stripes
The Marine Corps is ending continuous troop rotations to Norway, where hundreds of Marines have been deployed for the past three years, the Corps said Thursday.Translation? If the war ain't in the Pacific and against China then the Missile Marine Corps will not participate in the fighting.
Instead of having up to 700 troops at a time in Norway on six-month rotations, the Marines will conduct periodic training and exercises with the Norwegian armed forces, a spokesman for U.S. Marine Corps Forces Europe-Africa, Maj. Adrian J.T. Rankine-Galloway, said.
The change, which is set to take effect in the fall, would improve the overall combat readiness of Marine Corps forces and enable the U.S. to better align training with major Norwegian events, Rankine-Galloway said.
“Effective October 2020, U.S. Marines will shift to an episodic deployment model in order to better synchronize their arctic training with Norwegian forces and to allow for increased operational flexibility for the Marine Corps,” he said in a statement.
Another proud legacy bites the dust.
Belarus' Belta reports that 32 Russian Wagner private military contractors were detained last night near Minsk.
Belarus' Belta reports that 32 Russian Wagner private military contractors were detained last night near Minsk. Belarusian law enforcement say they received information that >200 Wagner contractors arrived to destabilize Belarus during the election.https://t.co/E19S0uwubx— Rob Lee (@RALee85) July 29, 2020
Wow! I've read comments discussing the situation in Belarus but didn't take it seriously enough.
WTF is Putin thinking? Not good. Not good at all.
Thursday, August 06, 2020
Type 96A, new armour package, FCS and thermal imager, JD-3 IR jammer and GL5 hard kill APS
![]() |
|
The war against China will be in AFRICA! It might be proxy forces that are lavishly equipped with Chinese Advisors or it might be frontline Chinese forces but it will be AFRICA not the Pacific!!!!
Do you see the armor above?
How well do you think the Missile Marine Corps would fare in a fight against a couple of Mech/Armor Battalions?
The answer? NOT GOOD. Casualties wouldn't be the problem. The problem will be that all those small, isolated (they call it dispersed) units, will be located and destroyed in order.
What is my answer (cause people seem to want to know)?
REINFORCE THE MEU! ADD TO EXISTING CAPABILITIES INSTEAD OF TRYING TO REVAMP THE FORCE AROUND PIXIE DUST!
Let's address amphibious ships first. This is the one place where Amos was right. He was a fan of the Mistral Class before I was. It just makes too much sense in my opinion. It's just a bit lighter than the San Antonio Class, can support MUCH MORE ROBUST flight operations, has similar capability to launch surface assaults and is AFFORDABLE! One America Class, San Antonio Class along with two Mistral Class ships could easily provide the early entry punch that we all desire and hope for.
Next up would be artillery. On this Berger is on the right path but getting there in the wrong way. What do we need a return to? Regimental Artillery! We don't have 8in guns in service anymore but we could field ATACMS there to break up armored assaults and to attack other targets. Working with the Army we could develop new land and surface attack missiles that fit the MLRS (maybe fewer missiles but they could range further). If not then we could go with bigger missiles mounted on alternate platforms. The MTVR is just waiting to be pressed into service as a missile launch platform.
The ACV? Needs to be turned into a family of vehicles. Full stop. No need to keep playing with the idea of a Marine Corps Fighting Vehicle. We needed one 40 years ago and we need one today.
Aviation?
This is the monster in the room that NO COMMANDANT has been able to cage. Simply put aviation is killing/has killed the Marine Corps and is the reason why we're seeing this bastardized Missile Marine Corps headed down the pike.
The main problem I see is that the AVIATION NECK DOWN CAMPAIGN has failed miserably!
Light Strike should make a comeback. It might be heresy but the V-280 as a tilt rotor light strike platform makes too much sense. Cut the F-35 buy and get some of those. Cut more F-35s and get onboard the Navy's program and buy Super Hornets. Rethink the CH-53K. One hundred million dollars for a helo? Someone at HQMC is smoking crack. If the EFV could get canned for cost then so should this bird. Cut KC-130s. The refueling mission should be tossed to the USAF and buddy tanking utilized when not possible. AH-1Z/UH-1Y should also go away with their mission being taken over by the V-280.
There's alot more but I don't have much time. We're gonna dig into this deeper this weekend but this should get us started.
Simple question.
If you're as alarmed as I am at the thought of the Missile Marine Corps then what's your force design for the future?
Thurs. Funny...When you see it you'll...
![]() |
|
It's juvenile but funny. If you don't get it I'll give you a hint. NECKLINE!
TEDBF twin engined LCA rendering
Wednesday, August 05, 2020
Tuesday, August 04, 2020
Beirut just got its teeth kicked in....
Stunning video shows explosions just minutes ago at Beirut port pic.twitter.com/ZjltF0VcTr— Borzou Daragahi 🖊🗒 (@borzou) August 4, 2020
Definitely not fireworks. I'd be surprised if anything remained standing after that. Wonder what it was. Did that look like a fuel-air explosion at the end to you?
If terrorist have bombs that hit that hard now then things just got serious for every major city in the Western World.
Can you imagine an explosion like that in Berlin, London, Tokyo or New York?
Elbit Systems Light PULS™ is a lightweight airborne rocket launcher system.
God in heaven no! I can see it right now. Some Missile Marine Aide is rushing into Berger's office shouting "boss, ya got to see this"!
Next thing you know he's on the phone to Elbit, he fast tracks a buy, the Missile Marines look like a bunch of terrorists driving around in technicals and he calls it a good thing.
Seriously though.
What is the benefit here? I'm not slamming Elbit but the concept. A lightweight, vehicle mounted rocket system that can fit into the back of a helicopter is gonna be too light to put down sufficient fires.
It's cool.
It stirs the soul.
But can it truly be said to be effective at its intended purpose?
Subscribe to:
Comments
(
Atom
)





























