Tuesday, July 13, 2010

AAV training at RIMPAC.

Seems like the Marines and Australian Army are the only ones doing real training and from the looks of things its not too intense.

RIMPAC 2010 will never be confused with a STEEL KNIGHT or a CAX at 29 Palms.

Israel wants F-15 Silent Eagles?


Awesome.  If they want F-15's instead of F-35's cool.  Just be done with it.  Either buy a US plane or don't but stop playing these damn games.  More at UPI...

For the Israelis, the advanced version of the F-15 Eagle has been seen as an alternative to the ill-starred F-35 for some time, both in terms of delivery schedule and cost.
Boeing unveiled the Silent Eagle in March, about the same time the Department of Defense announced the F-35 program's problems.
It will reportedly cost around $100 million per plane, which conforms with the ceiling the Israelis have put on acquiring a fifth-generation fighter.
The new F-15 configuration reportedly includes a stealth capability but that's only effective in evading the radars carried by hostile aircraft but not by ground-based radar systems.
Other improvements include adapting the F-15's conformal fuel tanks to carry weapons inside the fuselage rather than externally, thus reducing the radar signature.
One of the functions tested during the F-15 Silent Eagle's weekend flight was opening and closing its left side conformal weapons bay that contained an AIM-120 air-to-air missile, which wasn't fired.
One last thing.  If you think that you can buy a Silent Eagle for the same price as a legacy F-15K then someone in Israel is smoking crack.

Pic of the Day. July 13, 2010.

Another Joe Stemph Flickr Page Production!

Fifty-Three Delta

CH-53D Sea Stallion (BuNo 157736) of HMH-363 "Lucky Red Lions" arriving at West Wetlands park in Yuma, Arizona during a noncombatant evacuation drill supported by MAWTS-1 as part of Weapons and Tactics Instructor course 2-10.

Monday, July 12, 2010

Blast from the past. Expeditionary Tank.


If you've been reading my little blog here, you might have noticed that I've become fascinated with projects from the past that were left behind or not pursued.

Well, I found another promising project called the Expeditionary Tank.  Want a surprising tidbit of information?  It would have worked perfectly...as a matter of fact its main gun is being used on the Stryker!

Read more at Military-Today.

NH-90 suffers its first loss in Australia.


Don't know how I missed it but this is huge news.

The NH-90's problems have finally caught up with it and the lack of actual performance in the field is affecting sales.

How?

In Australia.  The Australians had a wonderful plan  to basically neck down to the NH-90 as a common utility type helicopter for their services...the Tactical version for the Army and the Maritime version for its Navy.

But because of the NH-90's below par service so far, the Australians reversed course and are instead procuring MH-60R's instead.

Glorious.  Read more at Defense Update.

Thompson on EADS Tanker bid.


Wow.  Thompson broke it down nicely when he penned his article covering EADS' bid in the latest tanker contest.

After reading his story it makes one wonder how in the hell our Congress is letting the Europeans bid their airplane at all.  Read more here.

However, the operational need for new tankers has been eclipsed by controversy surrounding how the tanker competition is being run. The World Trade Organization recently ruled that the Airbus unit of EADS has received illegal subsidies throughout its history that have enabled it to compete unfairly with U.S. producers of commercial transports. The biggest recipient of these illegal subsidies was the Airbus A330 transport -- the same plane EADS now proposes to use as its platform for a future Air Force tanker. Having seen both of its domestic rivals forced out of the commercial-transport business and its own global market share cut in half by competition from Airbus, Boeing and its backers are incensed that EADS is being allowed to bid. The Air Force says it needs EADS in the bidding to get the benefits of competition, and it is refusing to factor Airbus subsidies into its evaluation -- even though the past predatory behavior of Airbus is a key reason why it must go abroad to find a second competitor.
Congress is not so detached from the economic consequences of letting EADS bid. In fact, it probably will refuse to fund a tanker built by EADS, given what the World Trade Organization has said about the European company's unfair trading practices. EADS has elected to bid anyway, but its only hope of prevailing is to tap the same subsidies that the trade organization condemned since its plane typically sells for $50 million more than the competing Boeing 767 and burns over a ton more fuel per flight hour.
I read aviation blogs everyday and never heard this before.  Wow.  Time to find new blogs....EADS is acting like the Chinese nation...they're attempting to prey on our industry.

Sunday, July 11, 2010

Bob Cox says the F-35 program ahead of schedule.


When Bob Cox, probably the biggest untainted critic of the F-35 program says that its ahead of schedule and appears to be gaining momentum, then everyone should pay attention.  Follow this link to read the whole story.
Lockheed flew the ninth of the initial 13 flight-testing jets recently, counting the original prototype, which has already been retired.
By week's end, the test program had completed 146 flights this year compared with the 128 planned, a pace that, if, sustained, would enable the full-year goal of 394 flights to be met or exceeded.
Another measure of progress is the number of specific tests (test points) achieved: 1,438 completed compared with 1,255 planned.
All of which means that if F-35 testing continues at the current pace through the rest of this year, it will be just about where it was supposed to be at the end of 2009

Which means that 2009 won't be a lost year and that by the middle of 2011 the program should be right back on its pre-breach schedule!

TORC Autonomous Vehicle System

Blast from the past. USSR thought on fighting Landing Forces.


The CIA has released formerly classified documents (Top Secret at the time) that give an indication of how the Soviet Union would respond to different scenarios on the battlefield.  The documents range from the use of Border Guards during the initial stages of war to how they would fight Landing Forces.  Its a fascinating read and these and other documents can be found here.
1978-11-16                                                            

Blast from the past. Sikorsky S-72.


Ashton Carter has decried the current state of the US helicopter industry. 

He's wrong.  A quick look at past experiments, test beds and flying prototypes reveal that even old US ideas would be relevant even today.  A great example of that is the Sikorsky S-72.  Imagine the flexibility one of these aircraft would have in the attack role!  Stats from Aviastar.

Technical data for Sikorsky S-72 RSRA Crew: 2-3, engine: 2 x General Electric T-58-GE-5 turboshaft, rated at 1045kW and 2 x General Electric TF-34-GE-400A turbofans, 4180kg of thrust each, main rotor diameter: 18.90m, wingspan: 13.74m, fuselage length: 21.50m, height: 4.42m, take-off weight without auxiliary jets: 8300kg, empty weight without auxiliary jets: 6535kg, take-off weight with auxiliary jets: 11815kg, empty weight with auxiliary jets: 9480kg, max speed without auxiliary jets: 296km/h, cruising speed with auxiliary jets: 258km/h, max speed without auxiliary jets: 581km/h, cruising speed with auxiliary jets: 370km/h, ceiling: 3050m