All photos by Lance Cpl. Michael Petersheim
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
Monday, December 19, 2011
My take on why the Japanese chose the F-35...
My take on why the Japanese chose the F-35...and why the Eurofighter keeps losing...
1. Relationships count. The European community has been a practical no show in the Pacific. Until they make themselves more visible and become more active, they won't crack this market.
2. Costs count. Many are making an issue of the price tag of the F-35, but the latest costs came out for a little over 110 million for the airplane. You can play all the accounting tricks that you want but this plane is still in development and its coming in at the same price points as legacy aircraft with bells and whistles.
3. Twin engines are no longer supreme in over sea combat. I always thought twin engine reliability has always been over stated. The Japanese have operated their version of the F-16 in the sea strike role for a while and the F-35 will too. The thought that twin engines are a must have make as much sense as four engines being necessary for large airplanes operating over water.
4. China is a threat. This is probably the biggest factor. No matter how much some want to think of China as being a non-issue in the Pacific, that's just not the case. We're on the cusp of a major arms race in the Pacific and the reason is China.
What should scare critics is that the F-35 is on the verge of "Western World" domination. It will have 10 firm partner nations and two observer nations. This has happened before and it did not spell the end of fighter development in other companies. The European's need to quickly and efficiently start development on a 5th or 6th generation fighter in order to remain viable...the thought that they will be able to catch up via UAVs is wishful thinking. Due to government policy in the EU, US equipment will always get a battle test first and is usually looked at as being the best in the world.
Long story short. No one should be surprised.
Breaking! Japan picks F-35...
via Reuters...
(Reuters) - Japan picked Lockheed Martin's F-35 jet as its next mainstay fighter, choosing the radar-evading plane over combat proven but less stealthy rivals, as concerns simmer over North Korea after the death of leader Kim Jong-il and as China works to introduce its own stealth fighters.
Tuesday's decision comes as a shot in the arm for Lockheed Martin's F-35 program, which has been restructured twice in the past two years, and is expected to increase the odds that South Korea will follow suit with its own order for 60 fighters.
The F-35, which is in an early production stage, competed against Boeing's F/A-18 and the Eurofighter Typhoon, made by a consortium of European companies including BAE Systems, for a deal that could be worth up to $8 billion.
"This program badly needed an endorsement like this, particularly one from a technically respected customer. But there are still many complications, especially price tag and work share demands," said Richard Aboulafia, an analyst with the Virginia-based Teal Group.
He noted the F-35 program is facing tough scrutiny from U.S. lawmakers and defense officials who need to trim hundreds of billions of dollars from the U.S. defense budget over the next decade.
Japan, which counts the United States as its key security ally and regularly conducts joint military drills with U.S. forces, had been widely expected to choose the F-35 due to its advanced stealth capability and U.S. origin.
Fighter jets' stealth technology has drawn heavy attention in Japan since China, which has a long-running territorial dispute with Japan, in January confirmed it had held its first test flight of the J-20 stealth fighter jet.
North Korean state TV announced on Monday that Pyongyang's 69-year-old leader had died on Saturday from "physical and mental overwork."
(Additional reporting by Andrew Shalal-Esa, writing by Leika Kihara and Linda Sieg; Editing by Michael Watson and Edwina Gibbs)
LVTP(X) information request...
Hey all.
I need info, if you have on the LVTP(X). Little information is found on the web. Even the Marine Historical sites have little information on it. It appears to have been developed by FMC and was competing against the current AAV for the role. As a side note, I do realize that it was a modified M-113 (Sparks loved it), I'm aware that its sporting a 90mm gun in its turret...what I don't know is water speed, and why it was rejected by the Marines. I suspect it had something to do with the number of troops carried but I'd like to be sure.
I need info, if you have on the LVTP(X). Little information is found on the web. Even the Marine Historical sites have little information on it. It appears to have been developed by FMC and was competing against the current AAV for the role. As a side note, I do realize that it was a modified M-113 (Sparks loved it), I'm aware that its sporting a 90mm gun in its turret...what I don't know is water speed, and why it was rejected by the Marines. I suspect it had something to do with the number of troops carried but I'd like to be sure.
That's cute. Locals confuse X-47 with a UFO...
Wait...if you can't identify what is obviously an aerial vehicle then by definition it is a UFO!
2nd Recon Bn airborne training...
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)