Thursday, November 21, 2019

WTF is going on in the South China Sea?



My readers were talking about this madness at 0300 this morning and now I see it on my Twitter feed but nothing from the major networks.

WTF is going on?

Is this real?

Almost sounds like a sub had a catastrophic accident if its true.  Can't wait to find out what the real story is.

Convair Image Damaged Rocket Sled Dummy


Wrecked!  Glad this is a crash test dummy instead of a real human!

Pic of the day. Heavy gas, heavy weapons load Rafale heading out...


The French sure do build them pretty don't they?  Side note.  How can they build tanks with so much gas and everyone else seems to fail?

China’s Coast Guard ... part of the Chinese Navy Battle Fleet that goes uncounted

via USNI News.
The rapid expansion of China’s Coast Guard gives Beijing the means to shift its sea expansion aims from aspirational to operational, a panel of security experts concurred during a Monday event detailing China’s maritime ambitions.

In vast stretches of sea, an area stretching from the Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea to the Scarborough Shoals off the Phillippines in the South China Sea, China’s maritime forces are aggressively asserting claims to every landmass — natural or manmade — in this blue territory, the experts from several think tanks agreed while speaking at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

During the past few years, China’s Coast Guard increased the number of its intrusions into the waters around the uninhabited islands dotting the East China Sea that are also claimed by Taiwan, said Masahi Murano, a fellow at the Hudson Institute. The increase, Murano added, is, “because they are rapidly building Coast Guard vessels.”
Story here. 


The pic above?  China's monster coast guard ship that's bigger than a Burke or Brit Type 45.

The problem?

We use our own Coast Guard to roam far and wide.  From S. America over to the South China Sea, to the Persian Gulf and off the coast of Africa.

The conundrum?

They're doing the same.

The painful truth?

No one is counting Chinese Coast Guard hulls as part of their battle fleet.  Once you do then things get extremely...worrisome.

Want to set your hair on fire?

Add all the fishing boats and commercial shipping that will obviously flex into dual role assets (ie..break in case of war) and you have the beginnings of a naval scenario that will leave us in a world of hurt.

My solution?

It is essential that we bring back one piece of equipment to our ships.  We need the S-3 Vikings in the anti-surface, electronic warfare, scout plane role desperately.



We can't match them in shipping but we can get planes in the air and make our carriers more formidable.  Think about how much better our position would be if we had these two variants of the Viking flying right now!

Put them in both Marine Corps and Navy colors.  Have them fly off carriers, forward bases etc...hell even give a few to the Air Force if they'll have them and sell them to allies for pennies on the dollar (worthy allies...not Quislings that dot the planet).

We had it right in our past super power competition.  It's past time to dust off what worked instead of trying to flex our modern day "wonder weapons" into roles they're ill suited for.

Battle of Tarawa: Day One....Video by Cpl. Leynard Kyle Plazo

US Navy accepted delivery of its third Expeditionary Sea Base (ESB) ship, USNS Miguel Keith (ESB 5)


Story here.

I consider these ships to be an illustration of how "old" procurement clashes with new realities.

I've personally been calling for the ESB's to be paired along with MEU's to make them Reinforced.

A Reinforced MEU composed of a "Light Carrier", LHD, LPD, LX(R) x 2, and maybe an ESB augmented with increased artillery/ISR/anti-ship missiles and whatever else you want to throw into the mix would be a powerful and credible force entering the super power contest era we're in.

Instead we're going further down the rabbit hole of small, throw away (read that to mean expendable) ships when we know for a fact that we are NOT BUILT to have such a force!

Can you imagine the reaction of the Mothers Of America when they realize that their sons and GASP daughters are being placed on ships that the US Navy/Marine Corps considers "risk worthy"?

Someone isn't thinking this thru.

Additionally widely dispersed fleets are a nightmare to protect.  Ask the convoy sailors that tried the dispersed thing when the wolfpacks came calling.

With a small force (and trust me...we are down the road of a small force across the board), you can't afford to play cavalier games with it.

ESBs.

A great idea if we were only concerned with hunting terrorists.  The game has changed and we need to change our idea of using them.

Open Comment Post. 21 Nov 2019


A400M...Three missions in one...


Check out the plane here.

Of course its advertising but it gives a decent overview of the capabilities they claim it has and has some nice graphics to go along with it.  The "three missions in one" thing is kinda cool (although obvious and applies to virtually every cargo plane) and I like the effort.


What caught me by surprise?  The number of orders and deliveries.  174 ordered and 84 delivered?  Didn't think it was that many. 

One other thing.

I didn't know it was as fast as it is.  Mach .72?  I'm not an aviation guy but that seems kinda fast.  I could be wrong but maybe we need to take another look at this thing.

Speed and range.  If we're gonna re-conquer the Pacific we need speed and range...to include our airlift.

USAF Special Ops is looking for a CV-22 replacement...


via Air Force Magazine.
Air Force Special Operations Command is looking forward to a future replacement for the CV-22 Osprey, a revolutionary capability that is still new to the command, AFSOC’s head of requirements said.

Brig. Gen. David Harris, the command’s director of strategic plans, programs, and requirements, said the Osprey’s advancement changed how the Air Force is able to insert special operators by being able to fly faster and higher, and carry more. An Osprey’s top speed of about 240 knots, for example, is faster than helicopters such as H-60 variants and CH-47 Chinooks. The Osprey can get “above the clouds” and fly on an instrument profile before dipping through a hole in the clouds to drop troops in a small landing zone.

“They’re getting people to the target area that we weren’t able to get to the target area before,” Harris said during a Nov. 18 AFA Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies Event in Arlington, Va.

So AFSOC is looking at: What’s next? A future Osprey replacement could have improved cargo-carrying capability, such as three pallet positions, to serve a larger logistics role. It could have low-observable technology to be more stealth. It could fly much faster, at a speed of 450-500 knots, he said. All capabilities that could help AFSOC “get into places we haven’t seen before,” Harris said.

These capabilities will help provide more dilemmas for a capable adversary to face, he said. While it can be easier for an enemy to deny a larger mobility aircraft’s ability to land at austere locations, a vertical lift capability is harder to counter.

“If our adversary is targeting every 5,000-foot runway that is out there, every 6,000-foot runway that is out there, can they target every batch of grass that’s out there?” he said.

The Osprey has been a “workhorse” in current operations, especially in Afghanistan, Harris said.
Interesting.  We've seen Harriers but so far none of the sci-fi type tilt jet assault craft. Until we can build something like the Halo Hornet we're stuck in a speed, range and lift box ....


Spanish & Italian Forces @ "Toro 19" Exercise...








Royal Air Force CH-47 via "The Don" Photography...