Tuesday, June 28, 2022
Issues with comments section...
The modern bipartisan crusade to "make the world safe for democracy" has been a completely failed experiment.
Agree or Disagree? Explain your answer!The modern bipartisan crusade to "make the world safe for democracy" has been a completely failed experiment.
— Libertarian Party (@LPNational) June 10, 2022
Foreign military intervention has created and inspired multitudes of enemies, enslaved future generations to enormous debt, and made the US categorically less safe.
A-4 Skyhawk carrying a Mk-7 "Thor" A-bomb
I bet a modern version of this airplane just a bit larger would be so useful to forces today that it would make heads spin. Hell the last "humpback" model would probably be useful.An A-4 Skyhawk carrying a Mk-7 "Thor" A-bomb π The 762 kg Mk-7 was the first tactical nuclear weapon adopted by the US armed forces. Depending on the settings the weapon's yield varied between 8 to 61 kilotonnes. #avgeeks #aviation #aviationdaily #classic #ColdWar #USNavy pic.twitter.com/5pyiunus1C
— Air Power (@RealAirPower1) June 21, 2022
An explanation of why Snake Island turned into a flashpoint...
Well its an explanation. Still don't get it. Coastal Defense Units (Missile Marines) are setup to control sea lanes and this type thing is tailor made for them. Missiles from shore can reach out and touch any ship that tries to navigate these waters. So why fight over one miserable rock? One frigate stationed far enough out should be able to cover this without putting men/equipment in harms way by occupying the island."Snake island is key for russians to maintain the #Odesa blockade" says @YorukIsik, non resident scholar at the @MiddleEastInst#UkraineRussiaWar πΊπ¦π·πΊ pic.twitter.com/A6j0G7WliG
— The Debate – France 24 (@F24Debate) June 23, 2022
Monday, June 27, 2022
The debate over Force Design 2030 IS NOT OVER! See what Generals Zinni & Sheehan had to say about the plan...
Thanks to CoffeeJoeJava for the link!
Go to Defense News (here) and fast forward to 12:40 to see the interview.
I consider it a must see vid.
Long short? Subservience to the Navy instead of meeting combatant commanders needs, one foe/one place, irrelevance in the rest of the world, internal friction because the plan was done in secret, a maritime interdiction force that conducts recon/counter recon with a kinetic solution (pathetically small solution).
Certain parts of this thing are applicable.
Many parts of it are just plain stupid.
Case the colors, rebrand it as something new but don't call this monstrosity the Marine Corps.
NATO to increase the number of rapid reaction forces on high readiness from 40,000 to 300,000
So NATO is about to put more troops on high readiness than the entire USMC, the 18th Airborne Corps, a few wings of USAF Expeditionary Wings and the entire US Navy Atlantic Fleet on rapid reaction (high readiness)?JUST IN - NATO to increase the number of rapid reaction forces on high readiness from 40,000 to 300,000, says Stoltenberg.
— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) June 27, 2022
Crane drops tank with poisonous gas in Jordan
They are so lucky more didn't die.Crane drops tank with poisonous gas in Jordan's Aqaba port; at least 10 dead, 251 injured pic.twitter.com/wV4wDL2ixb
— BNO News (@BNONews) June 27, 2022
Sunday, June 26, 2022
Learn about the Aidar Battalion and its actions in 2014. That will give you a primer on this conflict, the real reasons behind it...
I still contend that the US doesn't have a dog in this fight.#Ukraine️ NeoNazi group the #Aidar Battalion trapped in the Azot plant of #Severodonetsk declared its surrender to #Russian forces. In 2014 Amnesty International accused Aidar of war crimes in the #Donbass, including abductions, theft, extortion, and executions. pic.twitter.com/eARJZjk9jP
— tim anderson (@timand2037) June 23, 2022
You know about Azov (and you've made your excuses for them) but what about the Aidar Battalion? A tidbit from Wikipedia.
In July 2014, Russia began a criminal investigation of Aidar's commander, Serhiy Melnychuk, for "organizing the killing of civilians".[26] Its volunteer pilot, Nadiya Savchenko, was captured by pro-Russian separatists near Luhansk, transported to Russia and charged with killing two Russian journalists.[27][28]On 8 September 2014 Amnesty International claimed that the battalion had committed war crimes, including abductions, unlawful detention, ill-treatment, theft, extortion, and possible executions.[18]On 24 December 2014, Amnesty International reported that the unit was blocking humanitarian aid from Ukraine reaching the population of the separatist-controlled areas. Over half the population in these areas depended on food aid. According to Amnesty International, the Aidar, Donbas and Dnipro-1 battalions said they are blocking the aid because they "believe food and clothing are ending up in the wrong hands and may be sold instead of being given as humanitarian aid".[29] Denis Krivosheev, acting Director of Europe and Central Asia for Amnesty International, stated that starving civilians as a method of warfare is a war crime.[30]In April 2015, the Ukrainian government-appointed Governor of Luhansk Hennadiy Moskal stated that Aidar battalion was "terrorizing the region" and asked Ukrainian Defense Ministry to rein in its members after a series of thefts, including ambulances and the takeover of a bread factory.[31]
Is there a right and wrong here? No. In my opinion you have different perspectives that have led to violent confrontation.
Are the Ukrainians right? Are the Russians? At this point it doesn't matter.
This fight will end up killing far more people outside the borders of Europe than will die on its battlefield.
A cessation of hostilities is necessary, not continued warmongering. The only way to win this game is to stop playing it.