Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Sea Ceptor.

The MoD released these computer generated images of the missile that they're developing.  Pretty impressive if it lives up to its billing...able to defend 500 miles?  Darn impressive.  Might be something the US Navy, US Army and US Marines might be interested in.  If I'm not mistaken that exceeds the Patriot RIM-116 by a wide margin.
The MoD has confirmed that a new Royal Navy missile defence system will be able to intercept and destroy enemy missiles travelling at supersonic speeds.

The £483M contract to develop this cutting edge air-defence system - known as Sea Ceptor - is being awarded to UK industry.


The system uses a new UK-developed missile capable of reaching speeds of up to Mach 3 and will have the ability to deal with multiple targets simultaneously, protecting an area of around 500 square miles over land or sea.


Sea Ceptor will be developed under a demonstration contract with MBDA (UK) that is expected to last for five years.

Pic of the day.

Pictured is a British soldier with his sniper rifle on board a Merlin helicopter on route to Camp Shawquat, Nad-e Ali.
British snipers fulfil a vital and enduring role on the battlefield, in terms of intelligence-gathering, target identification and eliminating high-value targets.
The L115A3 rifle, part of the Sniper System Improvement Programme (SSIP), is a large-calibre weapon which provides state-of-the-art telescopic day and night all-weather sights, increasing a sniper's effective range considerably.
Geez...that guys gear looks spotless...helicopter is remarkably clean too...where are the hydraulics cables dripping fluid everywhere???

That little Falklands issue pops up again.


via Defense Tech...

Dauntless will set sail for the Falkland Islands in the coming weeks armed with a battery of missiles that could “take out all of South America’s fighter aircraft let alone Argentina’s,” according to one Navy source.
The Type 45 destroyer is the most advanced anti-aircraft and anti-ballistic ship in the world equipped with 48 Sea Viper missiles and the Sampson radar, which is more advanced than Heathrow air traffic control
The ship is in a league of its own in air defence able to track dozens of multiple targets
“It can shoot down Argentine fighters as soon as they take off from they bases,” said another Navy source. “This will give Buenos Aires serious pause for thought.”
About fucking time. I guess someone finally woke up to the fact that 4 Typhoons just wasn't going to cut it (of which 2 are probably operational --- if they're doing strip alerts that must be murder---maybe we should count pilots in addition to aircraft)!  

What are we...as a Marine Corps doing?


Rant time.

For the first time in ten years (according to press releases) the Marine Corps is conducting a large scale amphibious exercise (Bold Alligator).

Meanwhile, we have Battalion Landing Teams (MEU's) doing exercises at Cobra Gold and Enhanced Mojave Viper.

All the work done to set the stage for mini-ARGs...distributed warfare and suddenly the powers that be have arrived at the point where Marine Expeditionary Brigade type training needs to be done!

For what purpose?

Why?

It hasn't been discussed publicly, the reasoning hasn't been explained...the thinking behind it hasn't been shared.

What in the name of Chesty is going on here!

The changing story regarding the USS Ponce.

The story of what the Navy SEALs will be doing with the USS Ponce keeps changing...first we have this from FoxNews reported a couple of days ago....

The U.S. Navy is working to place a 'mothership' for Special Operations Forces in the Middle East, Fox News confirms. 
The USS Ponce, which was most recently being used as a dock in the Mediterranean Sea for the Libyan operation, was scheduled to be decommissioned in December. Navy officials now tell Fox News that the ship will be transformed into a flotilla to be used by Navy SEALs
Then we have a comment made on the USNI blog by USNVO which stated this...
USNVO Says:
Just a thought. If you look at the RFP for the ship conversion, you immediately see several things.
1. This is not for SOF! Everything in the RFP points to supporting MIW. Helos, EOD, MCMs, MCM staffs.
2. Then ask, why would MCM in the Arabian Gulf suddenly get such a huge push? OK, that was too easy.
3. Following the logic, then you would want the ability to conduct MCM outside of land support since your potential opponent has a significant missile capability. So, you need a ship.
4. So why the PONCE? Need it now, needs MH-53 support capability, a well deck to support minesweeping sleds and EOD boats, and good Command and Control capability. So PONCE works where other options don’t, unless you want to give up a LHA or LHD?
4. Why now? Nothing sinister, I image a confluance of a variety of things are making it important now.
a. Changing world situation is focusing attention on MCM capability in the area of the SOH. With perhaps just a bit more emphasis than before.
b. Organic MCM and LCS hasn’t worked out quite like many people have hoped. So in order to support the dedicated MCM forces, you need support facilities.
c. The vulnerability of land bases to interdiction by missiles has increased and ballistic missile defense has not kept pace. Simply put, too many missiles not enough defensive missiles to cover everything yet.
So my thought is that financial priorities are changing due to the very real threat that we may need to conduct MCM operations in the Arabian Gulf and SOH in the very near future. The other cool features are nice, but the MCM support issue is the driver.
Why didn’t we do it before? Simply put, other priorities were seen to be more important. Nothing sinister, just different priorities were viewed as more important. So we end up with a stopgap with a future plan to procure a better ship down the road.
You play the percentages and sometimes you win and sometimes you lose.
 And then we have this from National Defense by Admiral Harvey...
But that will not be the focus of the USS Ponce, Adm. John Harvey told reporters in Washington Jan. 31.

“It is not the primary mission,” he said. “It’s not going over there as an alternate command ship. It’s not going over there as a special operating forces Death Star Galactica coming through the Gulf.”

The main purpose of what Harvey called the “afloat forward staging base interim” is to support mine sweeping operations and patrol combatant craft in the Persian Gulf, he said.

He called it an interim solution because the Navy may turn to its Mobile Landing Platform ships to perform the floating base role. The forthcoming budget will have details on the quantity and purpose of the MLPs and when they will be built, Harvey said.
Message discipline men.  Message discipline.

The USAF screws the Army...again.


The USAF screws the US Army once again.

Remember the C-27?  The Air Force wrested control of that program away from the Army based on the Key West accords...The Air Force stated that they could manage the program better and would see to Army inter-theater needs...then budget cuts hit and the Army is still without its airplane and the Air Force decided to mothball it.

But wait!  It gets worse!

The US Army is trying real hard to be a player in the new Pacific strategy and in order to be a player needs to get its troops to the scene as quickly as possible.  What does that require?  How about strategic airlift.  And what is the USAF also cutting?  C-5's and C-130's.  Not to mention the A-10's that are a close air support specialist.  Want to see the politically correct version of events?  Check this out from DoD Buzz...

As for the other aircraft the Air Force wants to go away, many of them are cargo planes. It plans to get rid of 27 C-5As, 65 C-130s and all of its C-27Js. They’ll probably end up with the A-10s, F-16 and F-15s in the Boneyard at Davis-Monthan AFB. Most of those aircraft could soon be harvested for parts, but Schwartz said airmen will protect the C-27s for now.
“Type-1000 storage is essentially recoverable storage,” he said. “You don’t use the airplanes for spare parts.  You don’t pick and choose and cherry– pick, which type-2000 storage allows you to do.  So obviously, type-1000 storage is more expensive.  It requires sort of ongoing surveillance and so on.  So that — the disposition is not final-final, but those are the options.”
My boy Elements of Power will disagree, and I can't wait to hear from him but if we're really talking about "jointness" then the USAF needs to get a bit more serious about its air lift responsibilities...oh and a second look at retiring the A-10 might be in order too.

Retired Navy Admiral (and carrier pilot) fully endorses the F-35.

BlackFive hits it out the park again...read it there but a tidbit...

Why does Stufflebeem so heavily tout the F-35?
But many fail to realize that the F-35C, with its data exchange and interoperability capabilities, will make the entire Carrier Strike Group (CSG) more capable, effective and lethal. Using similar methods in exercises like Red Flag, the F-22 Raptor made both air and ground units more effective by providing enhanced situational awareness of the battlespace; so will the F-35 provide better maritime awareness to the CSG including both Airwing assets as well as surface forces. The F-35C will make the CSG a better, more capable fighting centerpiece of American military power and force for good around the globe.
Very interesting.

If my memory is correct this is the first time I've heard full support for the F-35 from a high ranking Navy Officer (the flag ranks never actually retire). 

About time.

Just plain cool...different, but cool.

Monday, January 30, 2012

Marines face off with insurgents

Monday Mudballing...30 Jan 2012

I was reading this article from the Washington Post this morning and it has me thinking about a number of issues.

Dependents Overseas

The Army took the first hit but the tidbit from the referenced article has me wondering...
There are about 80,000 U.S. service members stationed in Europe, along with more than 200,000 family members and civilian employees.
The savings that will be realized by removing the overhead of dependents and civilian employees from overseas locations could and should be realized world wide by the US military.  It should be a USMC, USN and USAF imperative too.  That one move alone should save a tremendous amount of money.  Additionally it should allow bases to be consolidated or even shut down.  This is an obvious, uncontroversial move that should be implemented immediately.  Oh and I'm mainly looking at you USAF---shut down those European air bases!

US and European views of each other

This was predicatable but still eye opening...

In Washington, the long-held “vision of Europe is that there’s a bunch of reasonably rich countries, relatively lazy, and not standing up for American-initiated missions abroad as much as they should,” he said.
In contrast, Eide said, resentment and opposition to the U.S.-led occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan has reduced popular backing for NATO among many Western European countries. “NATO was identified simply as the organization that takes away our sons and daughters and sends them to faraway places to do nation-building in the desert.”
It won't happen but NATO is dead as an institution.  It is incapable of projecting power in a unified way and would be hard pressed to defend itself from a determined enemy.    We all focus on the equipment to fight wars but discount the will to fight.  I wonder if Europe still has the will (talking about its people, not its military) and they think that we're cowboys that gallop around the world imposing our will.  Like a bad marriage, we need a divorce.

Defense Budgets

Label this sad, but predictable...

U.S. and NATO officials fret that the cutbacks will further erode military weaknesses that were exposed during last year’s air war in Libya. Several European countries quickly ran out of munitions and had to order them on an emergency basis from Washington. European militaries also lacked capability to refuel their own planes or conduct adequate surveillance from the air.
“If there ever was a time in which the United States could always be counted on to fill the gaps that may emerge in European defense, that time is rapidly coming to an end,” Ivo Daalder, the U.S. ambassador to NATO, told reporters in Washington last month.
At the same time, Europe’s austere economic outlook is leading to a “further weakening of the core ability to defend ourselves,” said Norwegian Defense Minister Espen Barth Eide.
Oil-rich Norway is an exception to the trend; it is increasing its defense budget. But Europe’s overall economic woes are exacerbating existing tensions within NATO, Eide said in a recent speech at the Center for Security and International Studies, a Washington-based think tank.
We live in interesting times.

I can't wait to see how this turns out but if we suffer one more economic shock, I can see the US fully divesting itself of Europe, turning to the Pacific and not looking back.


Sunday, January 29, 2012

Check out this piece of shit SEAL "faker"...



via KitUp!

Listen to this bastard laugh when he talks about child rape.  A bullet to the back of the head would be too merciful!

24th MEU preps for final certification exercise.

All photos by Sgt. Richard Blumenstein




Resident Evil finally looks interesting.



My boy "Everyday No Days Off" Blogspot found this and it looks like Resident Evil is finally interesting.

Good graphics.

Interesting storyline (well I think it will be...fighting zombies and mutated zombies gets boring...another team to the fight adds spice)...

Might be a game worth buying when it comes out.

Saturday, January 28, 2012

Breaking! China has copied the F-35...due to enter service in 2014!


DAMN IT!


I knew liberal policies and a short sighted administration would lead to this!

The Aviationist Website has full details....

Just joking.  The Aviationist has this great photoshop pic of the F-35 in Chinese colors but the thought of it and the possibility shouldn't surprise anyone.


KitUp! Finally shows something unique.



KitUp! finally did a little something to break the drudgery of the Shot Show coverage.

I mean seriously.  I subscribe to 5 channels and they all had the same products on show.  The only person that broke the mold was MilSpeckMonkey and even then just a little.

But this offering from Gerber has me a little curious and I'll definitely check it out.  My biggest concern will be with the strength of the knife but it is suppose to be for fighting and not bushcraft so it should suffice.

We'll see.  Meanwhile, about time KitUp!  Not everyone has 1k to drop on a watch!  Can spend 250 bucks for a pair of pants etc...

USS Ponce as a seabase? Don't be confused...SOCOM wants an amphib.

via FoxNews.

The U.S. Navy is working to place a 'mothership' for Special Operations Forces in the Middle East, Fox News confirms. 
The USS Ponce, which was most recently being used as a dock in the Mediterranean Sea for the Libyan operation, was scheduled to be decommissioned in December. Navy officials now tell Fox News that the ship will be transformed into a flotilla to be used by Navy SEALs
Don't be confused by this move.

The amphibs...more precisely the big deck amphibs are the ships most desired by a variety of forces.

*Riverines want them as a base and as transport.

*SOCOM wants them for the same reason.

*Army Aviation sees it as a way to get into action displacing Marine aviation.

*Surface Navy sees them as a mine sweeping platform (aerial minesweeping has made tremendous strides lately...don't be fooled...the mission module for LCS will be a SeaHawk with appropriate mine sweeping gear)

*Naval Aviation sees them as an adjunct to the carrier in the sea control sphere.

The Marine Corps better get a little less purple and start protecting assets.  The seabase as a concept is dead for Marine Corps operations.  If you can't get it in the assault phase then you better leave it to your ship to shore connectors from your MPS ships.  The seabase is designed for extended counter insurgency operations OR extended conventional warfare.

These are not future Marine missions.

Lets get light.  Lets fight right and lets jettison the idea of enhanced logistics.  A medium weight force that arrives by sea with enough on hand logistics to support 15 (MEU), 30 (MEB) or 45 (MEF) days of sustained combat without support.

The guidebook has been established.  We just need to follow it instead of heading off on tangents.

And how about we focus on Marine Corps issues AND needs...not the joint forces.

NOTE:

This idea is pure craziness.  Don't be fooled into thinking that this won't be one of the most monitored ships in the Navy.  And in addition to the SEALs they better have a detachment of Marine Special Ops or Rangers on board because I can imagine speedboats, anti-ship missiles, enemy aircraft, pirates, lions and tiger and bears oh my! will be watching and ready to take a whack at this ship.

Electronic monitoring...visual monitoring...sat monitoring...everyone and their mother will be watching this thing.  So much for secret ops!

Friday, January 27, 2012

And now we're about to lose amphibs to SOCOM.

Well not yet but this should appear to be rather ominous news to the Marine Corps.  Navy SEALs are about to take a soon to be decommissioned LSD and use it as a mother ship/sea base.  From the Washington Post.
Until December, the Navy had planned to retire the Ponce and decommission it in March after 41 years of service. Among other missions, it was deployed to the Mediterranean Sea last year in support of NATO’s air war over Libya.
Instead, the ship will be modified into what the military terms an Afloat Forward Staging Base. Kafka, the Fleet Forces command spokesman, said it would be used to support mine-clearance ships, smaller patrol ships and aircraft.
The documents posted by the Military Sealift Command in December, however, specify that the mothership will be rebuilt so that it can also serve as a docking station for several small high-speed boats and helicopters commonly used by Navy SEAL teams.
Why do I get the feeling that all the work done to make sea basing a reality was for the benefit of SOCOM...and SOCOM alone?

A lack of urgency is killing the Marine Corps right now.  For some reason those at the highest levels don't seem to understand this basic leadership trait.

You can bet  big dollars that when all is said and done, the sea base will be a victim of the Marine Corps limited budget and will only exist for the boys in Tampa and Coronado.

BlackFive knocks it out the park!


I wonder why no presidential candidate's mentioned this.  We've heard the usual "we will not let the Obama administration gut defense" but FINALLY someone put it into context.

Outstanding.

Here’s a little fact to keep in mind when considering the current cuts to spending at DoD (and let’s be clear, there is nothing wrong with appropriate cuts to defense spending), besides all the other ramifications it promises:
Defense accounts for less than 20 percent of the federal budget but already exceeds 50 percent of deficit-reduction efforts. And for every dollar the President hopes to save in domestic programs, he plans on saving $128 in defense.
And that’s without the looming sequestration cuts (keep in mind, most war fighting costs are not included in the budget) of another half trillion dollars.
Or said another way, the administration has decided that it will attempt to cut spending primarily with cuts to national defense.  There is no serious program afoot to cut back the myriad of other government agencies and branches.  In fact, many are expanding (see EPA, IRS, etc.).
As for sequestration, Democrats are bound and determined to see it through, because, you know, national defense is less important than winning an ideological struggle.
Charles Hoskinson of POLITICO’s Morning Defense reports (btw, if you don’t subscribe to it, you should):
BUT REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS are still far apart on one key issue: taxes. We caught up with SASC Chairman Levin at a breakfast Thursday and he said he's counting on public pressure to push the GOP to accept new tax revenues as part of any solution - something they've so far refused to consider. Meanwhile, Levin and other Democrats won't budge on reversing sequestration except as part of a complete package. "The dam has got to be broken on revenues, and what I believe will break it is the threat of sequestration," he said.
Shorter Levin, “we’re more than willing to hold national security hostage and see it gutted to get our way on taxes”.
It is rather interesting  approach for an administration which is hung up on everyone paying their ‘fair share’.  It seems that the lion’s share of what it will surely tout during the upcoming campaign as serious budget cutting, will come from the one Constitutionally mandated duty it has – national defense.
As for all the programs that have a future funding liability of 200 trillion dollar?
Meh.
~McQ
 Shamelessly copied from their site.  If you're not dialed into them you should. 

31st MEU ships out to Cobra Gold 2012.


WHITE BEACH, OKINAWA, Japan-Marines with Battalion Landing Team 1st Battalion, 4th Marines, 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit board the amphibious dock landing ship USS Tortuga (LSD-46) in here, Jan. 25. Elements of the 31st MEU, including BLT 1/4 and portions of Combat Logistics Battalion 31, are scheduled to participate in the multi-lateral training exercise Cobra Gold 2012 in the Kingdom of Thailand alongside military participants from South Korea, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore and representatives from approximately 20 other countries., Cpl. Jonathan G. Wright, 1/25/2012 10:07 AM
WHITE BEACH, OKINAWA, Japan-Marines with Battalion Landing Team 1st Battalion, 4th Marines, 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit board the amphibious dock landing ship USS Tortuga (LSD-46) in here, Jan. 25. Elements of the 31st MEU, including BLT 1/4 and portions of Combat Logistics Battalion 31, are scheduled to participate in the multi-lateral training exercise Cobra Gold 2012 in the Kingdom of Thailand alongside military participants from South Korea, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore and representatives from approximately 20 other countries., Cpl. Jonathan G. Wright, 1/25/2012 10:04 AM
CAMP SCHWAB, OKINAWA, Japan-Marines with Battalion Landing Team 1st Battalion, 4th Marines, 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit transport Amphibious Assault Vehicles to the amphibious dock landing ship USS Tortuga (LSD-46) from Camp Schwab, Jan. 26. For the month of January, elements of the 31st MEU, including BLT 1/4 and portions of Combat Logistics Battalion 31, will participate in the multi-lateral training exercise Cobra Gold 2012 in the Kingdom of Thailand alongside military participants from South Korea, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore and representatives from approximately 20 other countries., Cpl. Garry Welch, 1/25/2012 9:14 AM
CAMP SCHWAB, OKINAWA, Japan-Marines with Battalion Landing Team 1st Battalion, 4th Marines, 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit transport Amphibious Assault Vehicles to the amphibious dock landing ship USS Tortuga (LSD-46) from Camp Schwab, Jan. 26. For the month of January, elements of the 31st MEU, including BLT 1/4 and portions of Combat Logistics Battalion 31, will participate in the multi-lateral training exercise Cobra Gold 2012 in the Kingdom of Thailand alongside military participants from South Korea, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore and representatives from approximately 20 other countries., Cpl. Garry Welch, 1/25/2012 10:08 AM

Thursday, January 26, 2012

USMC Military Police changing to Law Enforcement Battalions????

Marines with 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing's Military Police Company stand in formation for the last time Jan. 26 before de-activating during a ceremony at their headquarters building aboard Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point. The company was activated on April 25, 2009 and comprised of a headquarters section and 4 platoons, located at Marine Corps Air Stations Beaufort, New River and Cherry Point. "This and all other MP Companies Marine Corps wide will be shutting down and consolidating in three large battalions that will be known as the 'Law Enforcement Battalion,'" said Capt. Jonathon C. Ajinga, the commanding officer of 2nd MAW MP Company. "Each of the Marine Expeditionary Forces will have a battalion of MP's. These Marines will be under the direct command of the MEF and will be assigned duties as seen fit."


OK.

Consider this tin foil hat time.

I don't even know if I care if you think I'm crazy but a name means something.

Why would the Marine Corps change the name of its Military Police units to Law Enforcement Battalions?

MP's have a battlefield role.  Convoy security.  Route security.  Airfield security.  POW handling.  And general grunt duties....or so they will tell you.

Talk to any MP and he'll tell you that they have "more firepower in a 3 vehicle section than a Rifle Company."

So if we're talking about an outfit that has a wartime function then why will they call themselves by a civilian moniker...Law Enforcement Battalion?

Because it'll be easier to use them for domestic missions.  The name is pure dee stupid.  And names mean something.


Another of Mike Sparks crazy ideas that I like...



Surfing the web and came across one of Mike Sparks old articles...

Hate the guy, luv the guy...whatever.  But he did his research on military history and found some fascinating concepts that were tried and discarded.

The idea of using subs and helicopters is one of them.  Of course he carried it a step too far but his foundation was solid.

The Japanese had submarine aircraft carriers and with our current state of technology the experiments carried out in the 50's might be workable today.  Imagine instead of carrying a SEAL Insertion Vehicle (or whatever they're calling their mini-subs these days) you instead carried a Night Stalker Little Bird? Or two? 

Sound crazy?  The Navy and Marine Corps didn't think so...at least during the 50's.  Perhaps they were bolder and more capable of thinking outside the box than we are today.

No news on the Amphibious Combat Vehicle?

\
I've been reading the news on the defense budget today.

No mention of the Amphibious Combat Vehicle.  AAV upgrades.  Nothing.

Meanwhile we get clarity on the Army's Ground Combat Vehicle, the JLTV, the C-27, Carriers, Air Wings and end strength numbers (even cancellations provide clarity).

I find it amazing that the most important ground acquisition for the US Marine Corps has gotten no attention.

No mention.

We are lost in the woods when it comes to modernizing our ground component.

Say it out loud. 

The US Army has gone through the M-113 (with upgrades), the Bradley IFV (with upgrades), the Stryker IFV (with upgrades) and is embarking on getting the Ground Combat Vehicle.

The Marine Corps has been saddled with the AAV.

Now tell me something isn't broken in Marine land.

Are partnership missions the "meals on wheels" that Rush warned about????

The photos above are from Cobra Gold.

I'll spare you the captions.  They're not worth it in my opinion.  Understand I'm not getting on the Marines and Sailors that are sent on these missions...I am questioning our leadership.

Back during the 90's, Rush Limbaugh derided Clinton for sending the US Military on "meals on wheels" missions.  If you've taken a serious look at the current "exercises" you'll see that those fears of yesterday might be justified today.

Partnership missions appear to be glorified civics projects with little actual training taking place.

Marines playing patty cake with children.

Building schools/roads/villages.

Doing things that the Peace Corps should be doing...not the Marine Corps. 

If we are going to go back to being a force in readiness that arrives by the sea then we've got to get away from these types of programs.  If we are going to be smaller.  If we are going to have to do more with less...then we must focus on the missions at hand. 

I've never seen building villages as a critical skill for Marine Infantry.

Pic of the day. Mistral during LCAC certification.

VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. (Jan. 25, 2012) Landing Craft Air-Cushion (LCAC) 53 speeds from the French navy projection and command ship FS Mistral (L9013) to the shoreline during a well deck certification. Mistral will participate in Exercise Bold Alligator 2012, the largest naval amphibious exercise in the past 10 years. The exercise will take place Jan. 30 through Feb. 12. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Michael M. Scichilone/Released) 120125-N-CG436-056


JLTV? The Marine Corps is getting screwed!


The US Army is applying the big green d*ck to the Marine Corps.  How?  Well check out these two articles...the first from Marine Corps Times...

“If it comes in at the weight where it is right now, the Marine Corps simply cannot get involved [and] will not buy a joint light tactical vehicle that’s 20,000 pounds,” Conway said. “It doesn’t fit our expeditionary kind of capacity. We can’t carry it on our helicopters or even sling it.
“So, depending on what the evolution of the development looks like, we may have to depart ourselves from that buy and again [rehabilitate] what we’ve got to take us into the next decade.”
And then this from AOL Defense...
Senior service leaders, including Army Secretary John McHugh and Chief of Staff Gen. Ray Odierno, have repeatedly stated JLTV is the future of the Army's tactical vehicle fleet. The Army already decided to ramp down the MECV program -- from 50,000 to 100,000 vehicles down to roughly 6,000 for air assault ops -- to make way for the JLTV's entrance into the fleet. In 2010, service officials attempted to cancel the MECV program, until Capitol Hill forced the Army to pull it off the budget chopping block.
The closest Army units that match the Marine Corps when it comes to being expeditionary in nature are the 82nd Airborne and 101st Air Assault.

To think that the Army is going to forgo JLTV for those formations (Airborne/Air Assault) and attempt to push the JLTV on the Marine Corps is telling.


Bold Alligator prep

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

He likes it!

Just watching and reading the latest on the Navy SEAL rescue of the hostages in Africa...

I watched the coverage of the President by Chris Mathews on MSNBC and now I'm getting a bit concerned.

The press is fawning over the President's decision...Mathews is going bonkers over a clip in which the President is congratulating the SecDef telling him "good job."

And we have a Commander in Chief that has no experience with the military -- and he has just been successful on two high risk military operations. 

DON'T GET ME WRONG...I'M EXTREMELY PLEASED THAT THESE OPERATIONS WERE SUCCESSFUL!

What concerns me is that this type of success can lead to the type of over confidence that will lead to tragedy.  Somewhere, someone is thinking about laying a trap for our guys.  Somewhere, someone is going to try for another BlackHawk down incident.

If a blogger in the backwoods can consider that possibility then I hope someone at SOCOM is considering it too.

And I hope SOCOM has someone with the balls to say no, when they're asked to cross a bridge too far.

F-35 in 2011...the video

Monday, January 23, 2012

VMM-365

MARINE CORPS AIR STATION NEW RIVER, N.C. -Marines from Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 365 fly 8 MV-22B Ospreys in an echelon right formation on their way back to Marine Corps Air Station New River, Dec. 29. These eight Ospreys were some of the last aircraft to be tested out before the squadron goes on their deployment to Afghanistan.
, Lance Cpl. Martin R. Egnash, 12/29/2011 5:48
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION NEW RIVER, N.C. -Marines from Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 365 fly an MV-22B Osprey from Marine Corps Air Station New River toward Wilmington, N.C. This was part of the squadron’s last flight before their deployment in early January and their last flight of 2011, Dec. 29.
, Lance Cpl. Martin R. Egnash, 12/29/2011 5:46
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION NEW RIVER, N.C. -Marines from Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 365 fly an MV-22B Osprey from Marine Corps Air Station New River toward Wilmington N.C. This was part of the squadron’s last flight before their deployment in early January and their last flight of 2011, Dec. 29.
, Lance Cpl. Martin R. Egnash, 12/29/2011 5:40
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION NEW RIVER, N.C. -Marines from Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 365 land MV-22B Ospreys at Marine Corps Air Station New River, Dec. 29. This concludes the last flight of the year for the Marines flying eight Ospreys.
, Lance Cpl. Martin R. Egnash, 12/29/2011 5:55
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION NEW RIVER, N.C. -Marines From Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 365 refuel before their last flight before their deployment early January, and their last flight of the year, Dec. 29. The flight consisted of 28 Marines flying eight MV-22B Ospreys in designated formations to a landing zone and back. , Lance Cpl. Martin R. Egnash, 12/29/2011 5:02

Monday Mud Balling.


I'm sure you remember the raid on Bin Laden.  I had the sudden revalation that the "Secret Stealth Blackhawk" resembled the Comanche in many ways.  That also led to the idea that on the raid into Pakistan everything was there except for gunships.  No Little Birds.  No Apaches.  No Super Cobras.  As a matter of fact the only aircraft that accompanied the raid according to sources was were a pair of CH-47's that stayed on the other side of the border.  I mean seriously if there was ever a need for the Direct Action Penetrator version of the Blackhawk then this would have been that mission.

Unless.

Unless there was another airplane along that provided that type of support.  Just mud balling but would the 160th have a transport helicopter without some type of armed gunship?  Keep in mind that gunship would have to share the same stealth characteristics as the stealth transport or it wouldn't make sense.

A quick Google search didn't reveal much but there is no answer on what happened to the RAH-66 prototypes.  Wikipedia is unclear as to whether or not 5 or 16 examples were built before the program was cancelled but is it possible that the RAH-66 or a modified Apache is the missing aircraft in this scenario?


We got news that Panetta fully supports 11 aircraft carriers.  Good news for the Navy but which part?  More speculation on my part but watching videos this weekend, I was amazed at one that showed an F/A-18 being waved off because crewmen were on the landing area of the airplane as it was on approach.

I don't know if they're building that kind of flexibility into UAVs operating off aircraft carriers but if they aren't then you're looking at one of the most dangerous work places in the world becoming even more dangerous.  Add to it the fact that I have yet to read how they plan on integrating UAVs onto the decks of aircraft carriers (plenty of info on how they'll be utilized...plenty on how they could even be controlled by strike fighters and such but nothing on how they'll fit in the mix on the deck of a carrier0, and it has me once again wondering if the possibility of an all UAV carrier might be in the cards.  It would make ultimate sense in my mind because you would be able to establish unique handling drills for those airplanes.  Unique operating procedures for mishaps etc.

Naval air might be in for a shock.  In the end a carrier or two might end up under the control of the Surface Navy.  Consider it a re-imagined arsenal ship.

Sunday, January 22, 2012

Helocasting...Recon Style....

By Sgt. Elyssa Quesada
Reconnaissance Marines jump from a CH-53E Super Stallion here Jan. 19. The Marines serve with Battalion Landing Team 3/1, the ground combat element of the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit. The helicopter is flown by pilots of Marine Medium Helicopter Squadron 268 (Reinforced), the aviation combat element for the unit. The expeditionary unit is currently deployed aboard the amphibious assault ship as part of the Makin Island Amphibious Ready Group (MKIARG), which is a U.S. Central Command theater reserve force. The group is also providing support for maritime security operations and theater security cooperation efforts in the U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet area of responsibility.
 
By Sgt. Elyssa Quesada
Reconnaissance Marines jump from a CH-53E Super Stallion here Jan. 19. The Marines serve with Battalion Landing Team 3/1, the ground combat element of the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit. The helicopter is flown by pilots of Marine Medium Helicopter Squadron 268 (Reinforced), the aviation combat element for the unit. The expeditionary unit is currently deployed aboard the amphibious assault ship as part of the Makin Island Amphibious Ready Group (MKIARG), which is a U.S. Central Command theater reserve force. The group is also providing support for maritime security operations and theater security cooperation efforts in the U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet area of responsibility.
 
By Gunnery Sgt. Scott Dunn
Reconnaissance Marines jump from a CH-53E Super Stallion here Jan. 19. The Marines serve with Battalion Landing Team 3/1, the ground combat element of the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit. The helicopter is flown by pilots of Marine Medium Helicopter Squadron 268 (Reinforced), the aviation combat element for the unit. The expeditionary unit is currently deployed aboard the amphibious assault ship as part of the Makin Island Amphibious Ready Group, which is a U.S. Central Command theater reserve force. The group is also providing support for maritime security operations and theater security cooperation efforts in the U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet area of responsibility.

By Gunnery Sgt. Scott Dunn
Reconnaissance Marines jump from a CH-53E Super Stallion here Jan. 19. The Marines serve with Battalion Landing Team 3/1, the ground combat element of the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit. The helicopter is flown by pilots of Marine Medium Helicopter Squadron 268 (Reinforced), the aviation combat element for the unit. The expeditionary unit is currently deployed aboard the amphibious assault ship as part of the Makin Island Amphibious Ready Group, which is a U.S. Central Command theater reserve force. The group is also providing support for maritime security operations and theater security cooperation efforts in the U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet area of responsibility.


USMC and Naval Safety Center caught in a lie?

Joe sent me this story (thanks buddy) and although it dates back from last year I somehow missed it.  Its written by David Axe for Wired and its compelling.  READ it!

On March 27, 2006, at a Marine Corps air base in New River, North Carolina, an MV-22 assigned to Medium Tiltrotor Training Squadron 204 experienced an unplanned surge in engine power as the three-man crew was preparing for a flight. “That caused the aircraft to inadvertently lift off the deck approximately 30 feet,” Marine spokesman Maj. Shawn Haney explained. “It came back down … there was major damage sustained to the right wing and the right engine.”
Luckily, the three crewmembers were unhurt. The cost to repair the self-flying Osprey totaled $7,068,028, according to the Naval Safety Center, which tracks all Navy and Marine aircraft mishaps. An investigation by the Navy and manufacturers Bell and Boeing resulted in tweaks to the V-22′s engine controls.
Yet the Marines and the Naval Safety Center ultimately decided that the Osprey’s dangerous joyride didn’t count as a serious flying accident, known in Pentagon parlance as a “Class A flight mishap.” The reason, said Capt. Brian Block, a Marine spokesman: The aircraft wasn’t supposed to take off just then; therefore, it’s not a flight problem. If a V-22 suffers damage while preparing to launch or after landing, or if the crew does not explicitly command the aircraft to take off but it does anyways, then the accident doesn’t count as a flight accident.
Quite honestly I didn't like the way David characterized a potentially life threatening situation as a joy ride...but I get it.  He was probably frustrated at the insanity of it all.

Quite honestly I despise the spokesman's account of the incident as not being a "serious flying accident." 

They're playing word games.

Its cute if you're a guy and girl playing a dating game.

Its acceptable if you're a low life lawyer or Congressman (well not really but lets say expected).

Its totally unacceptable if you're a US Marine.  Higher standards and all that other jazz.

We (the USMC) need to get our house in order.  This is sad.  Pathetic.  Unacceptable.  And how this didn't get bigger air time is beyond me.

Archetype. The best short Sci-Fi film I've seen in years.

You know a short film is good when it has you wanting to see more.  You know its great when you sit through the credits cause you want to see who the actors, directors, producers etc...are.  Archetype is that kinda film for me.  Check it out!

A blast from the past: Marines In Action...1965

A Canadian Journalist slams the UK.

I was doing my regular web searches and ran across this article.  To say that I was shocked is an understatement.  This is via the Vancouver Sun.  Read the whole thing....its sad and if true, then our friends across the pond have some serious troubles that I never began to fathom.

Britain's constant boast that it punches above its weight internationally rings more hollow by the day. The defence ministry is eviscerating the Royal Navy and Royal Air Force and making deep cuts to the army, too. There have been sweeping redundancies across all three services, the sudden retirement of the fleet of Harrier jump jets, the premature retirement of the aircraft carrier Ark Royal and the likely immediate sale to raise cash of one of two carriers now being built. Even after the current round of Draconian cuts, it is difficult to see how Britain can sustain the force that will remain, let alone underwrite plans for a new generation of nuclear submarines, new frigates and the new F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.
That Britain can no longer even pretend to be a major global player was already obvious to its troops and allies in Iraq and in Afghanistan. Well-trained, brave soldiers from fabled regiments went into battle under-equipped because the British treasury no longer has enough money to pay for the kit required for expeditionary escapades. While, for example, Ottawa gave Canadian troops in Kandahar whatever they urgently required, from boots to state-of-the art command posts, helicopters and safer armoured vehicles, British troops often have had to make do with gear that sometimes looked as if it had seen service against Rommel's Afrika Korps - and in a few cases, may have actually been used in that war.
Much has been made lately of Britain's decision to opt out of a new European financial treaty that tried to rescue the continental economies because the other EU states refused to grant London's financial institutions special status. Britons of ``the wogs start at Calais'' school celebrated Prime Minister David Cameron's intransigence as they did earlier British decisions to keep the pound instead of the euro and to maintain a totally separate set of immigration and customs checks than their neighbours across the English Channel. The almost universal European response to Downing Street's latest act of isolationism was to say ``good riddance.''
I don't know if his critique of the Ministry of Defense is adequate.  As a matter of fact, at least a couple of procurement issues can be traced back to 'urgent requests' that were rubber stamped without proper vetting.  What I mean by that is this...it appears that the UK tried its best to make sure that its troops were properly equipped--no matter what the costs. 

I look forward to hearing British readers weigh in on this one.  I just don't know.

Saturday, January 21, 2012

Lava Viper 2012.

U.S. Marines with Gulf Company, 2nd Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, ride in CH-53 cargo helicopters while conducting immediate-action drills during Lava Viper in Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii, Jan. 20, 2012. Lava Viper is a battalion-level combined-arms training exercise to better prepare Marines for upcoming deployments.
U.S. Marines with Gulf Company, 2nd Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, ride in CH-53 cargo helicopters while conducting immediate-action drills during Lava Viper in Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii, Jan. 20, 2012. Lava Viper is a battalion-level combined-arms training exercise to better prepare Marines for upcoming deployments.
U.S. Marines with Gulf Company, 2nd Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, conduct immediate-action drills during Lava Viper in Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii, Jan. 20, 2012. Lava Viper is a battalion-level combined-arms training exercise to better prepare Marines for upcoming deployments.
U.S. Marines with Gulf Company, 2nd Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, conduct immediate-action drills during Lava Viper in Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii, Jan. 20, 2012. Lava Viper is a battalion-level combined-arms training exercise to better prepare Marines for upcoming deployments.
U.S. Marines with Gulf Company, 2nd Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, conduct immediate-action drills during Lava Viper in Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii, Jan. 20, 2012. Lava Viper is a battalion-level combined-arms training exercise to better prepare Marines for upcoming deployments.
U.S. Marine Sgt. Noland Lynch, section leader, combat assault company, stands atop an amphibious assault vehicle during Lava Viper in Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii, Jan. 19, 2012. Lava Viper is a battalion-level combined-arms training exercise to better prepare Marines for upcoming deployments.
U.S. Marine Pfc. Maxwell Dossett, machine gunner, Fox Company, 2nd Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, maintains security during immediate-action drills at Lava Viper in Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii, Jan. 19, 2012. Lava Viper is a battalion-level combined-arms training exercise to better prepare Marines for upcoming deployments.
U.S. Marines with Fox Company, 2nd Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, conduct immediate-action drills during Lava Viper in Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii, Jan. 19, 2012. Lava Viper is a battalion-level combined-arms training exercise to better prepare Marines for upcoming deployments.
U.S. Marine Lance Cpl. Marco Othon, with Echo Company, 2nd Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, maintains security during an immediate-action drill at Lava Viper in Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii, Jan. 19, 2012. Lava Viper is a battalion-level combined-arms training exercise to better prepare Marines for upcoming deployments.

Friday, January 20, 2012

Marine Aviation = 1...Critics = 0....

via CBS News via the AP

FORT WORTH (AP) — A U.S. defense official says Defense Secretary Leon Panetta is giving fresh backing to the Marine Corps’ version of the next-generation fighter jet, the F-35.
The F-35, which is developing Navy and Air Force variants, is the Pentagon’s most expensive weapons program. It has faced delays and other problems that raised doubts about its future.
During a visit Friday to a naval air station in Maryland, Panetta will announce that the Marines’ version of the Fort Worth-built joint strike fighter is no longer on what Panetta’s predecessor, Robert Gates, called “probation.” That’s according to a U.S. defense official who spoke on condition of anonymity in advance of the announcement.
Gates announced one year ago that if the Marines’ version of the plane had not overcome its problems within two years he would attempt to cancel it.
This is more about the partner nations than it is about the Marine Corps.  Canada, the UK, Australia, Japan and others have been nervous about the airplane being canceled.  This news should chill them out.

Thursday, January 19, 2012

CH-53 down in Afghanistan.

Just heard on a radio that a CH-53 went down in Afghanistan in Helmand province.  Its unknown (more precisely they aren't saying what caused the crash) what caused the incident, but all 6 people on board were killed.  This from ABC News via AP...

A NATO helicopter crashed in southern Afghanistan on Thursday, killing six members of the international military force, the U.S.-led coalition said.
The coalition said in a release early Friday morning that there was no enemy activity in the area at the time of the crash in southern Afghanistan.
The cause of the crash is still being investigated. The coalition did not disclose the nationalities of those killed.
The helicopter crash occurred on the same day seven civilians were killed outside a crowded gate at Kandahar Air Field, a sprawling base for U.S. and NATO operations, after a suicide attacker set off a vehicle laden with explosives. The Taliban claimed responsibility, claiming they were targeting a NATO convoy.
It was the second suicide bombing in as many days in southern Afghanistan, officials said. The coalition said no NATO troops were killed. It does not disclose information about injured troops.

Rest in peace to the fallen and comfort to their families.

VMFAT-501 gets another bird...

BF-7 departs Naval Air Station Fort Worth Joint Reserve Base at 2:07 p.m. CST on its 90 minute ferry flight to Eglin Air Force Base, Fla. With the delivery of BF-7, a F-35B short takeoff/vertical landing (STOVL) jet, Eglin is now the home of the largest F-35 fleet in the Department of Defense. (Lockheed Martin photo by Randy Crites)

F-35A Performs First Night Flight