Friday, June 29, 2018

Armor Porn. BLT 2/5 conducts mechanized assault from the sea....Pics by Gunnery Sgt. T. T. Parish

Note.  Small suggestion to Combat Camera bubbas.  If you guys could (it might be beyond difficult), would it be possible to include pics of squad movements?  Individual pics of vehicles is one thing, but I think it misses the bigger picture when we see individual pics of Marine Riflemen doing work. Just a suggestion so don't rage.









I think this is one thing that will be missed with the ACV (or maybe not I don't know if it has these hatches).  Being able to get the lay of the land with your own two eyes gives you a perspective on what's happening and where you're going better than any view/led screen...

The Air Force Needs Army's Help to Best Russia's S-400 Missile


via Military.com
The U.S. Air Force needs the help of the Army to outsmart Russia's enhanced S-400 anti-air defense system, a top general said Thursday.

"Part of the emphasis with our multi-domain operations that we're doing with the Army is trying to find ways that we can defeat these systems together, so that we can get in there faster and be more effective sooner," Gen. Mike "Mobile" Holmes, commander Air Combat Command, told reporters during a breakfast in Washington, D.C.

While Holmes said the S-400's capability in comparison to its S-300 long-range predecessor is an incremental upgrade at best, his concerns stem from the upgraded range of the S-400, a new mobile missile battery called an "F-35 killer" by Moscow.

"Constantly evolving defensive systems, constantly evolving offensive systems, the big things that we see are increasing range and increasing sensitivity of the sensors that are deployed with the evolving surface-to-air defenses," Holmes said.
Story here. 

The shield of the Army, the vaunted USAF is now looking to the Army so that it can do it's job.

Now do you see why I say the promise of the F-35 isn't realized?

Do you get why I believe that air supremacy has been lost with the debacle that is the F-35?

This joker tried to shift the blame to 4th gen fighters but we're supposedly getting long range missile to take out these systems.  We're buying a shit load of F-35's that are suppose to get within spitting distance and not be detected.

But now they're having to leverage Army long range fires to assist them?

Simply amazing...and depressing...

Stryker Air Defense Variant is what the Army got...what they need is the SLAMRAAM on FMTV or JLTV!


The image you see above is what the US Army is proposing for its anti-air system to keep up with its Stryker Brigades (and probably some version for the Bradley too...).

The more I think about it the more I think they came up short.

What they need is the SLAMRAAM.  Mount it on the FMTV truck, the JLTV or use the HUMVEE to tote the thing. 

They're platform centric when they need to be thinking about payloads!  Everything can be a shooter.  We really need to dump the idea of "pure" brigades.  Everything in a Stryker Brigade DOES NOT need to be based on the Stryker if it comes at a price in performance.

The Stryker Air Defense Variant gives up too much in performance to meet threats against even insurgents...we won't even discuss what a peer air force could do to our ground forces.




A dude named "Goon" once told me during the days when I was a full fledged supporter of the F-35 to do two things.  The first was to get out of my normalcy bias.  It was a challenge and I took him up on it. I didn't like what I saw when I did.  The next thing was to follow the money and determine what the real challenges were --- not by press release but where money suddenly was getting tossed to.

We really don't have to do any of that with regard to this subject.  We know that the ground forces of the United States are planning for a fight where the US does NOT have air superiority.  We have heard it stated plainly from many officials.  We see the Army and Marine Corps attempting to slow walk air defense back into their formations.

That's the good.  The bad?  They're doing it too slow. They're wedded to platforms instead of weapon systems that can give us a standoff advantage...a very much needed part of ADA...you have to kill the archer before he releases his quiver of arrows.

SLAMRAAM IS HERE NOW.  The Army and Marines should act poste haste to buy it and get it into service....hell even trial seeing if the Meteor can be ground launched but we need something better than the Stinger or Sidwinder when most air to ground missiles seriously outrange them!

Stryker platform limitations are limiting future capabilities...Anti-Air variant seems inadequate...


Many of you will look at the above pic and think..Ok, the Army is moving forward with an air defense variant of the Stryker.  Many more of you will say about time.

I'm not so sure. 

Defense News has an excellent article on this and I'm wondering if they should have upgraded beyond the Stryker to a more modern design.  Check this out...
The Army went through a selection process through the Department of Defense Ordnance Technology Consortium to determine the best collection of vendors to build prototypes.

A Boeing-GDLS team was a front-runner for an interim SHORAD mission package, unveiling before any other vendor a solution in August 2017 at the Space and Missile Defense Symposium in Huntsville, Alabama.

Using an Avenger system on top of the Stryker, which was the team’s solution, sought to take what was already in the Army’s inventory to create a system.

And a SHORAD demonstration at White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, last September saw more possibilities for the interim solution including Rafael’s Iron Dome and South Korean defense firm Hanwha’s Flying Tiger.

But a dark horse emerged at the Association of the U.S. Army’s Global Force Symposium, also in Huntsville, in March. Leonardo DRS showed an unassuming small-scale mock-up of its concept at its booth at the symposium that featured its partner Moog’s Reconfigurable Integrated-weapons Platform.

The platform would provide a choice of sites, direct-fire weapons and missiles, Ed House, DRS Land Systems’ business development manager, told Defense News at the show. The system would be able to integrate both Stinger and Longbow Hellfire missiles, requirements for the service’s IM-SHORAD solution.

It also would come equipped with a complement of direct-fire weapons and sites to include the M230 chain gun and the 7.62mm coaxial machine gun. But the solution also has non-kinetic defeat capabilities and Rada’s onboard multimission hemispheric radar.

And that dark horse has won the opportunity to provide the mission equipment package for the IM-SHORAD prototype program.

The system will also have Hellfire rails as well as an onboard sensor, according to Worshim.

The Army decided to choose DRS to provide the mission equipment package because of the flexibility of its reconfigurable turret, which allows for growth opportunities should the threat change or something else change that requires a new interceptor or another capability, Worshim said.

The solution also posed less intrusion to the existing Stryker platform, he added, and provided an increased level of protection as the crew reloads ammunition, which can be done under armor.

While the Avenger solution was deemed technically acceptable and met requirements, one of the reasons the Army decided against using the Avenger on Stryker as the solution was because the government felt it would require major modifications to the Stryker, according to Worshim.


The Army has a desire to keep the Stryker as common across the fleet as possible, Worshim said.
Story here. 

Did you read the entire article?  Did you focus on the part that I highlighted?

It's all reasonable and troubling at the same time.  Reasonable because they're doing the best they can with what they have. 

Troubling because much better vehicles are out there yet the Army is going to ride into the future on the wheels of the Stryker and its now affecting how they procure new equipment.

Do we need a heavier weight anti-air system that can keep up with maneuver forces (heavier as in more ready to launch missiles)?  In my opinion yes.  Should that system be available for use on the JLTV up to the Stryker and beyond?

Yeah in my opinion it does.

The interim vehicle that Shinseki sole sourced is the future of the Army...and its limitations are affecting how it buys gear.

This ain't good.

Open Comment Post. 29 June 2018


I criticized Australian defense procurement. I was accused of it being clickbait. So you tell me...what is YOUR rating of Pacific powers?


Yesterday on a blog post I criticized Australian defense procurement.  A couple of Aussies came onto blog and stated that they were not only solid but a leading nation in the region.

Maybe I'm jaded but I look at the ability to power project as the basis of my criticism.  To me it's lacking in the Aussie Defense Model.

To take it a step further I see them mirroring our capabilities and not bringing anything unique to the table. That pissed some people off.  Ok.  I get it.  You think I'm wrong.

So let's slice this apple a different way.

COMMENTS on this blog post should be about one thing.  How you rate Pacific powers.  A quick and dirty 1 to 5 should suffice and a short explanation of why.  The one caveat?  You leave the US and China off the list.

Why do this?

Because I believe no other region on the planet has a greater chance of peer vs peer warfare occuring.  Additionally I believe that "nominal" friends today could easily become mortal enemies with a quickness.

So how do you rate them?

Nature is brutal...


You might have been aware of the above pic but not me.  It never crossed my mind that Owls would be considered prey by Falcons.

This is brutal.

Nature is a brutal, unforgiving bitch.