Tuesday, September 24, 2019

Australian Army receives first batch of BOXER IFVs according to DTR Magazine...





Wow.  Congrats to the Australian Army and Rheinmetall.

Is it just me or is this remarkably quick for a major defense procurement?

Monday, September 23, 2019

General Dynamics Land Systems on Instagram...

General Dynamics Land Systems on Instagram...

 
 

Stunning result...Netanyahu won majority of votes to head new Israeli Government ...we were told he lost!


Pretty stunned to see this and as usual Sputnik is the one reporting it not mainstream news in the US.

This is stunning.

Netanyahu won.

I don't know the implications of this but there certainly must be a few.  Additionally while the Iranians have released the Brit tanker, nervousness about their intentions must have played a role in his victory.

The Middle East continues to burn.

Offshore Support Vessels for the Navy/Marine Corps amphibious fleet?

via USNI News.
“How do we, as an amphibious warship force in the United States Navy, how do we support this [Expeditionary Advance Base Operations] concept?” Frank DiGiovanni said during a panel at Modern Day Marine 2019, referring to one of the Marines’ two new operating concepts.
“We came up with kind of the same thing the commandant put out in his guidance: we saw a need for a smaller set of diversified ships, we call them OSVs.”

DiGiovanni made clear that this wouldn’t come at the expense of the large multi-mission amphibious warships the Navy already buys, but “the more that you can diversify and complicate the enemy’s targeting capability, the better.”

He went on to note that Marines need large ships to get people and gear into a theater, but once there, they may be at risk if they remain concentrated. OSVs would contribute to Marines being able to disperse for their own protection, as well as giving them the agility and maneuverability to get in and around islands or other littoral water features.

“It’s a concept we’re looking at, and the commandant calls it out,” he told USNI News after the panel presentation.
“He doesn’t call it an OSV, but he does say small, scalable, more maneuverable, flexible kinds of things. The OSV is certainly a class or a type of ship we’ve worked with before.”

He acknowledged that the Spearhead-class Expeditionary Fast Transport (EPF), which the Navy bought for intratheater lift and will soon be used for ambulance-type medical transports, is also being looked at. The Austal-built EPF comes in at 103 meters long with a draft of 12.5 feet. The OSV the Navy has developed for the Iraqi Navy is 60 meters long and is primarily used to bring personnel and supplies to and from oil production platforms in the Persian Gulf. The OSV was also the basis for the design of two Pentagon-built Large Unmanned Surface Vessels, dubbed Ghost Fleet, that are being used to begin experimentation and prototyping efforts in the LUSV field.

“The book’s open right now; no decision has been made on what we want to do. But it’s certainly something we need to think about,” DiGiovanni said.
Story here. 

Hmm.  So we need a ship to shore connector that doesn't have to reach the beach?  We're looking at something that can handle high seas but doesn't necessarily have to sail with the gators?

We need something in theater that can ferry supplies from our amphibs 200 plus miles off shore to about 3 miles from the beach and won't have our guys tossing around like corks in the water, but has high water speed?

I think the DiGiovanni has it pretty much covered.  We're probably looking at what we already have but more specialized.


So what are we looking at?  Keep the guns and missiles up front (that's the party)...and stretch the back, reinforce the deck, add a ramp or if possible a small well deck (the business end) and I think we have what they're looking for.

Modification?  You bet.  Major mods?  Don't know, I'm not a naval engineer but in my mind it sounds doable.  Can we plug a new section of ship into existing models to get what I'm looking for?

If we can make it work then we have a semi-credible platform for the Reinforced Company Expeditionary Team.  Tailor its aviation, armor, artillery and logistic support for minor operations, scale it so it plugs into a MEU and send them to the four corners of the world.

Give me 30 modified ships of this type and we suddenly can float more Marines than ever before.  Hell we would have an additional MEU afloat...just disaggregated/dispersed.

USMC testing EOS R400S Mk2 for legacy AAVs.

R400S-Mk2-D-HD XM914 firing on a Pratt and Miller Expeditionary MAV from EOS - Electro Optic Systems on Vimeo.

via Military.com
The Army is testing a high-tech dual remote weapons station that can be operated from inside a vehicle -- a capability Marine officials are eyeing for their aging fleet of Assault Amphibious Vehicles.

Last month, soldiers at Fort Sill in Oklahoma tested the R400S Mk2 dual remote weapon system. The R400S Mk 2, which is produced by EOS Defense Systems USA, Inc., can operate a variety of weapons including a machine gun, automatic grenade launcher, 30mm cannon or Javelin missile. It weighs less than 1,000 pounds and can "provide significant and flexible lethality from a land or sea platform," according to company officials.

The system, which can be used from the back of a vehicle or another remote location, uses high-tech sensors that allow soldiers and Marines identity targets more than 7 miles away.

"You can identify your target at a distance further than the effective range of the weapons systems," Steve Below, vice president of operations with EOS Defense Systems USA, told Military.com at the Modern Day Marine expo here.
I talked to the guys at EOS and the chest thumping was real...the confidence high.  They believe they have a winner and I believe them.

Over and over again they talked about only two things.

Hyper accuracy of the system.

Identification/engagement range.

For better or worse the AAV will be with us for awhile longer.  I can live with that.  What I can't live with is the lack of lethality that its age has brought with it.  This system can make up for that shortcoming in a BIG way.

Personally I'm thrilled.

Open Comment Post. 23 Sept 2019





Norwegian Ministry of Defense looking forward to the K9 Thunder...



Blast from the past. USMC Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations Concept Document...

Thanks to Richard for the trip down memory lane!

Add this to the list of MV-22 variants that doesn't seem to be getting off the ground. Quite honestly if they followed thru with some of the planning it would undoubtedly be the most important airplane in the Marine Corps.  Quite honestly if they had followed thru with this plan then we would be able to possibly wait on the F-35 till it was working right and continue on with the Harrier for the next decade.










I talked about my never ending pride in the Marine Corps and my intense frustration.  Consider this exhibit number one!

Look at all these fantastic ideas that don't seem to be getting any movement! The Marine Corps is a THINKING, EVOLVING, and TRAIL BLAZING organization that strives for perfection.

We put in the sweat equity but the funding keeps alot of the brainwork from seeing the light of day.

The Marine Corps irrelevant?  Not hardly!  Not likely!

For all the people throwing stones at this house its walls are high and formidable.  The work is being done.

HQMC might frustrate at times but they show glimpses every now and then that they're focused on the big fight...the future fight.

Note.  The EABO Concept document has been erased from the internet...well Scribd has it but it's behind a paywall.  Probably upload it if people want to see the original but I don't want to run afoul of HQMC and the farm boys across the way at Quantico.  Let me see if it considered "close hold"  before I go further (kinda curious cause they did release the public version but like I said...its gone from Marines.mil).

Sunday, September 22, 2019

Chinese Police on patrol in Serbia?


I don't even know the implications but this seems...curious...

Granatkastarpansarbandvagn 90 (BAE CV90 Mortar Carrier) vid...

Thanks to jagigen for the link!

French armored vehicles are missing one component. Name the modern tracked IFV they sport!


Has anyone taken a good look at the French armored vehicle tree?  Maybe I'm missing it (and I'd be happy to be corrected) but they don't have a modern tracked IFV.

Even worse I can't find evidence anywhere that they're looking to build one either!


Don't get me wrong.  I've called the VBCI perhaps the most underrated 8x8 on the market today.

The French have a real winner with that vehicle.  But the lack of a tracked IFV...a modern one (the AMX10 is REALLY long in the tooth) is rather stunning from my seat.

For better or worse the French appear to have settled on the 8x8 as their ride going into the future.

No heavy tracked IFV for them!

Divisions are back in fashion for the US Army...

via Military Times.
As the new Army chief of staff settles into his role this fall, he’s looking at setting the stage for massive deployments across the world, should the need ultimately arise.

The large-scale combat operations laid out under the new National Defense Strategy would require division-strength movements, unlike the repeat deployments to the Middle East over the past 18 years, during which the Army’s primary unit of action has been the brigade.

The service’s brigade combat teams have been gearing up over the past few years in an effort to reach higher readiness rates. But being ready at home station and being ready to deploy over the Atlantic Ocean to wage war in Eastern Europe are two very different undertakings, and a conflict at the scale imagined by current Pentagon leaders will require far more than a single brigade.
Story here. 

Brigades never felt right as the "nominal" unit for the Army.  Division seem more natural.  Maybe its just a case of normalcy bias on my part.  Maybe its me looking at it from the outside and realizing how much the Army supports others while in theater and a feeling that the Brigades just couldn't tote the same amount of gear in that regard.

Don't know.

But I do know that the Brigade system was confusing (at least to me), top heavy and a bit unwieldy.

I cheer this change.