VMM-365

MARINE CORPS AIR STATION NEW RIVER, N.C. -Marines from Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 365 fly 8 MV-22B Ospreys in an echelon right formation on their way back to Marine Corps Air Station New River, Dec. 29. These eight Ospreys were some of the last aircraft to be tested out before the squadron goes on their deployment to Afghanistan.
, Lance Cpl. Martin R. Egnash, 12/29/2011 5:48

MARINE CORPS AIR STATION NEW RIVER, N.C. -Marines from Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 365 fly an MV-22B Osprey from Marine Corps Air Station New River toward Wilmington, N.C. This was part of the squadron’s last flight before their deployment in early January and their last flight of 2011, Dec. 29.
, Lance Cpl. Martin R. Egnash, 12/29/2011 5:46

MARINE CORPS AIR STATION NEW RIVER, N.C. -Marines from Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 365 fly an MV-22B Osprey from Marine Corps Air Station New River toward Wilmington N.C. This was part of the squadron’s last flight before their deployment in early January and their last flight of 2011, Dec. 29.
, Lance Cpl. Martin R. Egnash, 12/29/2011 5:40

MARINE CORPS AIR STATION NEW RIVER, N.C. -Marines from Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 365 land MV-22B Ospreys at Marine Corps Air Station New River, Dec. 29. This concludes the last flight of the year for the Marines flying eight Ospreys.
, Lance Cpl. Martin R. Egnash, 12/29/2011 5:55

MARINE CORPS AIR STATION NEW RIVER, N.C. -Marines From Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 365 refuel before their last flight before their deployment early January, and their last flight of the year, Dec. 29. The flight consisted of 28 Marines flying eight MV-22B Ospreys in designated formations to a landing zone and back. , Lance Cpl. Martin R. Egnash, 12/29/2011 5:02

Monday Mud Balling.

I'm sure you remember the raid on Bin Laden.  I had the sudden revalation that the "Secret Stealth Blackhawk" resembled the Comanche in many ways.  That also led to the idea that on the raid into Pakistan everything was there except for gunships.  No Little Birds.  No Apaches.  No Super Cobras.  As a matter of fact the only aircraft that accompanied the raid according to sources was were a pair of CH-47's that stayed on the other side of the border.  I mean seriously if there was ever a need for the Direct Action Penetrator version of the Blackhawk then this would have been that mission.

Unless.

Unless there was another airplane along that provided that type of support.  Just mud balling but would the 160th have a transport helicopter without some type of armed gunship?  Keep in mind that gunship would have to share the same stealth characteristics as the stealth transport or it wouldn't make sense.

A quick Google search didn't reveal much but there is no answer on what happened to the RAH-66 prototypes.  Wikipedia is unclear as to whether or not 5 or 16 examples were built before the program was cancelled but is it possible that the RAH-66 or a modified Apache is the missing aircraft in this scenario?

We got news that Panetta fully supports 11 aircraft carriers.  Good news for the Navy but which part?  More speculation on my part but watching videos this weekend, I was amazed at one that showed an F/A-18 being waved off because crewmen were on the landing area of the airplane as it was on approach.

I don't know if they're building that kind of flexibility into UAVs operating off aircraft carriers but if they aren't then you're looking at one of the most dangerous work places in the world becoming even more dangerous.  Add to it the fact that I have yet to read how they plan on integrating UAVs onto the decks of aircraft carriers (plenty of info on how they'll be utilized...plenty on how they could even be controlled by strike fighters and such but nothing on how they'll fit in the mix on the deck of a carrier0, and it has me once again wondering if the possibility of an all UAV carrier might be in the cards.  It would make ultimate sense in my mind because you would be able to establish unique handling drills for those airplanes.  Unique operating procedures for mishaps etc.

Naval air might be in for a shock.  In the end a carrier or two might end up under the control of the Surface Navy.  Consider it a re-imagined arsenal ship.

Helocasting...Recon Style....

By Sgt. Elyssa Quesada
Reconnaissance Marines jump from a CH-53E Super Stallion here Jan. 19. The Marines serve with Battalion Landing Team 3/1, the ground combat element of the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit. The helicopter is flown by pilots of Marine Medium Helicopter Squadron 268 (Reinforced), the aviation combat element for the unit. The expeditionary unit is currently deployed aboard the amphibious assault ship as part of the Makin Island Amphibious Ready Group (MKIARG), which is a U.S. Central Command theater reserve force. The group is also providing support for maritime security operations and theater security cooperation efforts in the U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet area of responsibility.

 

By Sgt. Elyssa Quesada
Reconnaissance Marines jump from a CH-53E Super Stallion here Jan. 19. The Marines serve with Battalion Landing Team 3/1, the ground combat element of the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit. The helicopter is flown by pilots of Marine Medium Helicopter Squadron 268 (Reinforced), the aviation combat element for the unit. The expeditionary unit is currently deployed aboard the amphibious assault ship as part of the Makin Island Amphibious Ready Group (MKIARG), which is a U.S. Central Command theater reserve force. The group is also providing support for maritime security operations and theater security cooperation efforts in the U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet area of responsibility.

 

By Gunnery Sgt. Scott Dunn
Reconnaissance Marines jump from a CH-53E Super Stallion here Jan. 19. The Marines serve with Battalion Landing Team 3/1, the ground combat element of the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit. The helicopter is flown by pilots of Marine Medium Helicopter Squadron 268 (Reinforced), the aviation combat element for the unit. The expeditionary unit is currently deployed aboard the amphibious assault ship as part of the Makin Island Amphibious Ready Group, which is a U.S. Central Command theater reserve force. The group is also providing support for maritime security operations and theater security cooperation efforts in the U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet area of responsibility.

By Gunnery Sgt. Scott Dunn
Reconnaissance Marines jump from a CH-53E Super Stallion here Jan. 19. The Marines serve with Battalion Landing Team 3/1, the ground combat element of the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit. The helicopter is flown by pilots of Marine Medium Helicopter Squadron 268 (Reinforced), the aviation combat element for the unit. The expeditionary unit is currently deployed aboard the amphibious assault ship as part of the Makin Island Amphibious Ready Group, which is a U.S. Central Command theater reserve force. The group is also providing support for maritime security operations and theater security cooperation efforts in the U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet area of responsibility.

USMC and Naval Safety Center caught in a lie?

Joe sent me this story (thanks buddy) and although it dates back from last year I somehow missed it.  Its written by David Axe for Wired and its compelling.  READ it!

On March 27, 2006, at a Marine Corps air base in New River, North Carolina, an MV-22 assigned to Medium Tiltrotor Training Squadron 204 experienced an unplanned surge in engine power as the three-man crew was preparing for a flight. “That caused the aircraft to inadvertently lift off the deck approximately 30 feet,” Marine spokesman Maj. Shawn Haney explained. “It came back down … there was major damage sustained to the right wing and the right engine.”
Luckily, the three crewmembers were unhurt. The cost to repair the self-flying Osprey totaled $7,068,028, according to the Naval Safety Center, which tracks all Navy and Marine aircraft mishaps. An investigation by the Navy and manufacturers Bell and Boeing resulted in tweaks to the V-22′s engine controls.
Yet the Marines and the Naval Safety Center ultimately decided that the Osprey’s dangerous joyride didn’t count as a serious flying accident, known in Pentagon parlance as a “Class A flight mishap.” The reason, said Capt. Brian Block, a Marine spokesman: The aircraft wasn’t supposed to take off just then; therefore, it’s not a flight problem. If a V-22 suffers damage while preparing to launch or after landing, or if the crew does not explicitly command the aircraft to take off but it does anyways, then the accident doesn’t count as a flight accident.

Quite honestly I didn't like the way David characterized a potentially life threatening situation as a joy ride...but I get it.  He was probably frustrated at the insanity of it all.

Quite honestly I despise the spokesman's account of the incident as not being a "serious flying accident." 

They're playing word games.

Its cute if you're a guy and girl playing a dating game.

Its acceptable if you're a low life lawyer or Congressman (well not really but lets say expected).

Its totally unacceptable if you're a US Marine.  Higher standards and all that other jazz.

We (the USMC) need to get our house in order.  This is sad.  Pathetic.  Unacceptable.  And how this didn't get bigger air time is beyond me.

Archetype. The best short Sci-Fi film I've seen in years.

You know a short film is good when it has you wanting to see more.  You know its great when you sit through the credits cause you want to see who the actors, directors, producers etc...are.  Archetype is that kinda film for me.  Check it out!

A blast from the past: Marines In Action...1965

A Canadian Journalist slams the UK.

I was doing my regular web searches and ran across this article.  To say that I was shocked is an understatement.  This is via the Vancouver Sun.  Read the whole thing....its sad and if true, then our friends across the pond have some serious troubles that I never began to fathom.

Britain's constant boast that it punches above its weight internationally rings more hollow by the day. The defence ministry is eviscerating the Royal Navy and Royal Air Force and making deep cuts to the army, too. There have been sweeping redundancies across all three services, the sudden retirement of the fleet of Harrier jump jets, the premature retirement of the aircraft carrier Ark Royal and the likely immediate sale to raise cash of one of two carriers now being built. Even after the current round of Draconian cuts, it is difficult to see how Britain can sustain the force that will remain, let alone underwrite plans for a new generation of nuclear submarines, new frigates and the new F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.
That Britain can no longer even pretend to be a major global player was already obvious to its troops and allies in Iraq and in Afghanistan. Well-trained, brave soldiers from fabled regiments went into battle under-equipped because the British treasury no longer has enough money to pay for the kit required for expeditionary escapades. While, for example, Ottawa gave Canadian troops in Kandahar whatever they urgently required, from boots to state-of-the art command posts, helicopters and safer armoured vehicles, British troops often have had to make do with gear that sometimes looked as if it had seen service against Rommel's Afrika Korps - and in a few cases, may have actually been used in that war.
Much has been made lately of Britain's decision to opt out of a new European financial treaty that tried to rescue the continental economies because the other EU states refused to grant London's financial institutions special status. Britons of ``the wogs start at Calais'' school celebrated Prime Minister David Cameron's intransigence as they did earlier British decisions to keep the pound instead of the euro and to maintain a totally separate set of immigration and customs checks than their neighbours across the English Channel. The almost universal European response to Downing Street's latest act of isolationism was to say ``good riddance.''

I don't know if his critique of the Ministry of Defense is adequate.  As a matter of fact, at least a couple of procurement issues can be traced back to 'urgent requests' that were rubber stamped without proper vetting.  What I mean by that is this...it appears that the UK tried its best to make sure that its troops were properly equipped--no matter what the costs. 

I look forward to hearing British readers weigh in on this one.  I just don't know.

Lava Viper 2012.

U.S. Marines with Gulf Company, 2nd Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, ride in CH-53 cargo helicopters while conducting immediate-action drills during Lava Viper in Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii, Jan. 20, 2012. Lava Viper is a battalion-level combined-arms training exercise to better prepare Marines for upcoming deployments.

U.S. Marines with Gulf Company, 2nd Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, ride in CH-53 cargo helicopters while conducting immediate-action drills during Lava Viper in Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii, Jan. 20, 2012. Lava Viper is a battalion-level combined-arms training exercise to better prepare Marines for upcoming deployments.

U.S. Marines with Gulf Company, 2nd Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, conduct immediate-action drills during Lava Viper in Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii, Jan. 20, 2012. Lava Viper is a battalion-level combined-arms training exercise to better prepare Marines for upcoming deployments.

U.S. Marines with Gulf Company, 2nd Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, conduct immediate-action drills during Lava Viper in Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii, Jan. 20, 2012. Lava Viper is a battalion-level combined-arms training exercise to better prepare Marines for upcoming deployments.

U.S. Marines with Gulf Company, 2nd Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, conduct immediate-action drills during Lava Viper in Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii, Jan. 20, 2012. Lava Viper is a battalion-level combined-arms training exercise to better prepare Marines for upcoming deployments.

U.S. Marine Sgt. Noland Lynch, section leader, combat assault company, stands atop an amphibious assault vehicle during Lava Viper in Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii, Jan. 19, 2012. Lava Viper is a battalion-level combined-arms training exercise to better prepare Marines for upcoming deployments.

U.S. Marine Pfc. Maxwell Dossett, machine gunner, Fox Company, 2nd Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, maintains security during immediate-action drills at Lava Viper in Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii, Jan. 19, 2012. Lava Viper is a battalion-level combined-arms training exercise to better prepare Marines for upcoming deployments.

U.S. Marines with Fox Company, 2nd Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, conduct immediate-action drills during Lava Viper in Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii, Jan. 19, 2012. Lava Viper is a battalion-level combined-arms training exercise to better prepare Marines for upcoming deployments.

U.S. Marine Lance Cpl. Marco Othon, with Echo Company, 2nd Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, maintains security during an immediate-action drill at Lava Viper in Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii, Jan. 19, 2012. Lava Viper is a battalion-level combined-arms training exercise to better prepare Marines for upcoming deployments.

Marine Aviation = 1...Critics = 0....

via CBS News via the AP

FORT WORTH (AP) — A U.S. defense official says Defense Secretary Leon Panetta is giving fresh backing to the Marine Corps’ version of the next-generation fighter jet, the F-35.
The F-35, which is developing Navy and Air Force variants, is the Pentagon’s most expensive weapons program. It has faced delays and other problems that raised doubts about its future.
During a visit Friday to a naval air station in Maryland, Panetta will announce that the Marines’ version of the Fort Worth-built joint strike fighter is no longer on what Panetta’s predecessor, Robert Gates, called “probation.” That’s according to a U.S. defense official who spoke on condition of anonymity in advance of the announcement.
Gates announced one year ago that if the Marines’ version of the plane had not overcome its problems within two years he would attempt to cancel it.

This is more about the partner nations than it is about the Marine Corps.  Canada, the UK, Australia, Japan and others have been nervous about the airplane being canceled.  This news should chill them out.

CH-53 down in Afghanistan.

Just heard on a radio that a CH-53 went down in Afghanistan in Helmand province.  Its unknown (more precisely they aren't saying what caused the crash) what caused the incident, but all 6 people on board were killed.  This from ABC News via AP...

A NATO helicopter crashed in southern Afghanistan on Thursday, killing six members of the international military force, the U.S.-led coalition said.
The coalition said in a release early Friday morning that there was no enemy activity in the area at the time of the crash in southern Afghanistan.
The cause of the crash is still being investigated. The coalition did not disclose the nationalities of those killed.
The helicopter crash occurred on the same day seven civilians were killed outside a crowded gate at Kandahar Air Field, a sprawling base for U.S. and NATO operations, after a suicide attacker set off a vehicle laden with explosives. The Taliban claimed responsibility, claiming they were targeting a NATO convoy.
It was the second suicide bombing in as many days in southern Afghanistan, officials said. The coalition said no NATO troops were killed. It does not disclose information about injured troops.

Rest in peace to the fallen and comfort to their families.

VMFAT-501 gets another bird...

BF-7 departs Naval Air Station Fort Worth Joint Reserve Base at 2:07 p.m. CST on its 90 minute ferry flight to Eglin Air Force Base, Fla. With the delivery of BF-7, a F-35B short takeoff/vertical landing (STOVL) jet, Eglin is now the home of the largest F-35 fleet in the Department of Defense. (Lockheed Martin photo by Randy Crites)

F-35A Performs First Night Flight

JOAC released. AF set to be priority service.

The JOAC has been released and although there isn't much news in it, it does reveal a surprising couple of facts...
The document focuses on striking deep and not rolling back enemy forces.  It also emphasizes leveraging our superiority in certain areas to counter act enemy attempts to use irregular warfare to disrupt our efforts.

Long story short this is a strategy that is tailor made to Air Force thinking circa Desert Storm 1.

Any thoughts that the Navy would become the lead service in this enterprise is just wishful thinking.  The Navy is mentioned but its operated on the margins.  Talk about small boats armed with IEDs, and being able to conduct anti-mine warfare are some of the items that stuck out in this document.

The Army got one blurb in....using the land forces to support this concept.

Big winner is the AF for obvious reasons.  The Navy got steam rolled and the Army/Marine Corps are set to be sidelined (if this goes forward as outlined in this paper).  Air Force one, the rest of the service 0.

JOAC Jan 2012 Signed

Israel conducts first Airborne exercise in 15 years....

I call this gearing up.  Reconstituting airborne capability after so many years?  And then conducting it at a battalion level (at least)?  They're gearing up for Iran and they want the whole world to know it.  The attack on that country's nuclear reactors might include more than destruction...maybe a snatch and grab too....

The caption for the following pictures is as follows:

January 17, 2012

As part of their first operational parachuting drill in the last 15 years, the entire Paratroopers Brigade soared through the air. The drill was conducted under the supervision of the Brigade's commander, Col. Amir Bar'am, and in the presence of Maj. Gen. Gershon Hacohen.
In the drill, thousands of the Brigade's soldiers have pushed their limits, examining their preparedness for whatever future operation that might arise, all in the effort to continue to assure Israel's security.

11th MEU raiders fast-rope

Photo by Gunnery Sgt. Scott Dunn

 

Photo by Gunnery Sgt. Scott Dunn

Photo by Cpl. Chad Pulliam

Photo by Gunnery Sgt. Scott Dunn

Photo by Gunnery Sgt. Scott Dunn

Photo by Cpl. Chad Pulliam

Photo by Cpl. Chad Pulliam

Photo by Cpl. Chad Pulliam

The Captions for the above photos is as follows:
Marines serving with the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit's maritime raid force descends from a CH-46E Sea Knight hovering 35 feet above USS Makin Island here. The helicopter is flown by pilots serving with the unit's aviation combat element, Marine Medium Helicopter Squadron 268 (Reinforced). The unit is currently deployed aboard the amphibious assault ship as part of the Makin Island Amphibious Ready Group, which is a U.S. Central Command theater reserve force. The group is also providing support for maritime security operations and theater security cooperation efforts in the U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet area of responsibility.

NH90 NFH

Latest photos from Eurocopter...

This guy is getting on my nerves...

Seriously getting on my nerves.

Dan Lamothe, Marine Times Reporter and blogger at Battle Rattle has a story up about an injured Marine.  Go over to his spot to check it out but this is what irritates...

Marine Corps Times has taken some heat for reporting that there are questions over whether Carpenter covered the grenade to protect his buddy, Lance Cpl. Nick Eufrazio. Actions along those lines have yielded prestigious valor awards in the past, obviously.
Those questions exist, though, at least in the minds of some in the Corps. Additional Marine sources have reaffirmed that since the story was published yesterday. Both lance corporals are heroes nevertheless, but Marine officials acknowledge they are uncertain what happened and still investigating.

Geez.

Talk about inside baseball.

Spell it out for Christ's sake.  Its annoying and demeaning.  Annoying because he treats his readers as if they're not worthy of knowing what the real issues are and demeaning because he acts as if this is info only he and the 'circle' can know about.

F-35 QLR...

Courtesy of my buddy Joe!....He also provided this link if you have difficulty reading the attachment here...
DOD F-35 Concurrency Quick Look Review, 29-Nov-2011

AMH Seacoaster...an air cushioned catamaran.

Have you ever heard of the Sea Coaster?

How about a prototype for an air cushioned catamaran that could serve as a ship to shore connector, deliver heavier loads at less power output, is beachable, and is able to deliver its cargo/passengers there with less discomfort than a standard LCAC or LCVP?

Oh and did I mention that its able to do all that in heavier sea states than the LCAC can while traveling at higher speed?

Well this project conducted in conjunction with ONR proved all of the above and then some.  The only question is...why go through all the trouble of proving this DARPA hard research (to include building a prototype) and then abandon the research?

I have no idea...but the missing link in the sea base (if it actually gets built...something I seriously doubt in a shrinking Navy and limited budgets) has been found. 

We just weren't bold enough to chase it.  Read more about it here and here.

F-35C future in doubt?

Wow.

This one caught me by surprise although I did do a "wouldn't it be ironic post" on the very subject.

From British Forces News.

The Royal Navy’s new Joint Strike Fighter may be unable to land on an aircraft carrier because of a design flaw according to a Pentagon report leaked to a national newspaper.
Documents obtained by The Sunday Times reveal the report – called the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Concurrency Quick Look Review – has identified a serious flaw in the aircraft’s design.
It reveals eight simulated landings of the new variant all-purpose jet, known as the F-35C, failed because the “arrestor” hook, used to stop the plane during landing, is too close to the undercarriage at just seven feet away, compared with 18ft on existing US Navy aircraft.
The report concludes that a “significant redesign” of the aircraft is needed and that the future of the aircraft is at risk.
It also suggests the new fighter may be unable to fire British Asram air-to-air missiles and is untested in several other areas. It says if a redesign proves too costly and complicated the entire F-35C programme may have to be scrapped.
The Ministry of Defence has declined to comment on the leaked report but said
Defence Secretary Philip Hammond “discussed a number of issues including the Joint Strike Fighter” with his counterpart Leon Panetta in his recent visit to Washington.
A spokesman said: "We are taking delivery of our first Joint Strike Fighters for test and evaluation purposes this year and are committed to purchasing the carrier variant of the JSF. Our plans remain on track to have a new carrier strike capability from around 2020.”

I don't know this website.

Don't know if its credible.

Don't know if its valid.

But if this is in anyway true then this is at the very least a matter of concern.  The APA boys have been playing this one up and the documentation they've provided seems spot on.  If the tail hook issue requires a redesign then the A and B are ok but the C is in serious jeopardy.  Add to it the fact that only the USN, USMC and RN are buying it (and the USMC very reluctantly and the RN seems torn with many---including famed Falklands Battle fighter pilot Sharkey Ward recommending the B for the Navy---and the USN seemingly not very enthused) and you have the makings of an easy exit ramp for the program...a Pentagon sacrificial lamb and the rest of the program proceeding on its merry way.

Now how do I drum up support in the UK for a switch back to the B model???