Generation Kill...

I come in peace. I didn't bring artillery. But I'm pleading with you, with tears in my eyes; If you fuck with me, I'll kill you all. - US Marine General James Mattis, to Iraqi tribal leader

 

The Buccaneer Aviation Group Rollout

Via UK Air Show Review

I don't know if this is a public or private group but they're worthy of support either way.  Its a cliche but if you forget it, you'll repeat it.  Latest evidence is Afghanistan.  We sought to fight terrorist, got roped into nation building and repeated the mistakes that the Russians made.  But I'm off on a tangent.  If you get a chance check out UK Aviation Review.  I think you'll really like their site.

Super Jeep...

via Jalopnik

Check out this guys video page.

Jaba149  has some of the best videos on military aviation that I've seen on the web.  If you're not a subscriber then you're wrong.

LCS jacked up. Visby too small. How about Absalon?

The Absalon as an LCS replacement.  via Wikipedia.

General characteristics
Class and type:	Absalon class flexible support ship
Displacement:	6,300 tonnes
Length:	137.6 m (451 ft 5 in)
Beam:	19.5 m (64 ft 0 in)
Draft:	6.3 m (20 ft 8 in)
Propulsion:	2 × MTU 8000 M70 diesel engines; two shafts 22,300 bhp (16.4 MW)
Speed:	24 knots (44 km/h)
Range:	9,000 nmi (17,000 km) at 15 kn (28 km/h)
Boats and landing craft carried:	2 × SB90E LCP 2 × RHIBs
Complement:	169
Sensors and processing systems:	Thales SMART-S Mk2 3D volume search radar Terma Scanter 2100 surface search radar Atlas ASO 94 sonar 4 Saab CEROS 200 fire control radars ES-3701 Tactical Radar Electronic Support Measures (ESM)
Electronic warfare and decoys:	4 × 12-barrelled Terma DL-12T 130 mm decoy launchers 2 × 6-barrelled Terma DL-6T 130 mm decoy launchers Seagnat Mark 36 SRBOC
Armament:	1 × 5 inch (127 mm)/54 Mark 45 mod 4 gun 7 × 12.7 mm Heavy machine gun 3 × VLS with up to 36 RIM-162 ESSM/RIM-7 Sea Sparrow (Mk 56/Mk 48 VLS) 8-16 × Harpoon Block II SSM 2 × Oerlikon Millennium 35 mm Naval Revolver Gun Systems CIWS MU90 Impact ASW torpedoes 4 × Stinger Point-defence SAM
Aircraft carried:	2 × EH-101[1] or 2 × Westland Lynx
Aviation facilities:	Aft helicopter deck and hangars

This ship my friends is damn near perfect for what I see as the future of Naval Warfare.

Imagine taking your fleet of these ships and instead of making them all multi-mission, have a certain number specialize in a particular form of warfare.

You would theoretically have one squadron designated as pure frigates to operate with the fleet...another squadron to assist in Special Ops missions...another for Riverines...Amphibious Ops...etc...

Instead of buying a whole slew of mission modules you'd buy X number for each squadron to fit their specialization.

And don't hit me with the not built here.  Lockheed Martin, Northop and others can build it in their ship yards!

Follow up: Gunners Position on Navy Combat Support Helicopters.

Note the field of fire  for the gunner in the above photos

Thanks for the pics Jesse!

I did a post a couple of days ago lavishing much praise on this hidden jewel...Navy Combat Support Helo Squadrons.

The concept is sound, the firepower they can potentially bring to a fight unmistakable but there is one nagging problem.

The gunners station and his arc of fire.  The Navy took a huge leap forward with the installation of the Army's ESSS kit.  Again, the only issue I have with the system is the restrictions it paces on the gunner and his arc of fire. 

A couple of off the shelf systems might be a workaround for a select set of helicopters were the primary mission will be set at Combat Support and Rescue.

The first off the shelf solution might be the Army's universal weapons mount for the Kiowa.  You'll still have limited fields of fire but it should open it up a bit...especially if they're able to mount it at the rear of the cabin.

RAMCIS is the next solution.  The good.  It'll block the field of fire for only one of the gunners.  The even better good is that you'll have a low cost multi-mission cannon that could imobilize enemy fast boats with one shot.  The manufacturer states that it can penetrate several feet of concrete so this should be darn effective on rubber/fiberglass boats.  The bad.  I have no idea how the targeting works or if it could even hit a moving target.  It was designed to kill mines.  The worse still.  It looks heavy as all outdoors.

Whether they fix or not, the Navy is doing good things...they should brag about their warfighting capability a bit more.

Sidenote:  If there isn't room on carriers to get these Squadrons to the fight then the USMC/USN and NAVAIR needs to workout a way to get these helos out to the amphibs. I'd also like to see them working hand in hand with the Riverines...and the possibility of them being assigned to the Coast Guard to augment their HITRON teams is mouth watering.

Happy Easter...

Happy Easter All.


Update:

The Easter Bunny hates you (via r.crichton7...thanks buddy you saved me from starting the day off in a bad mood)



So while you're sleeping Easter Bunny is training to kick your ass!  Love it!

Finally Canadians Talking Common Sense In Regards To The F-35

via the Vancouveur Sun.  Read it all but the juicy part.

Unfortunately, sometimes ridiculously exaggerating what the auditor-general had to say about how the proposed purchase has been handled, politicians and other critics merge these two issue, using the bureaucracy's mistakes to question the need for the fifth generation F-35 itself.
Let's live in the real world. Unless Canada decides drastically to change its defence strategy and becomes pacifist and isolationist, we will continue, as we have done for a century, to commit ourselves to military alliances and partnerships to further our national interests. To be worthy allies and partners we have to be more than peace-keepers uttering platitudes - the bulwark of the Liberal defence strategy for years.
As with the entire F-35 debate, the auditor-general's report is being discussed with no external context.
The competence and integrity of the folks at the Defence Department aside, what about the eight other partner countries in the program, and the Japanese, who have ordered 42 F-35s? Why are a bunch of Europeans signed up to an American program when the EU nations already produces several newish fighter jets of their own. Are they all idiots, too?
The multinational JSF program follows on that of the F-16, another U.S. warplane chosen by many European countries about 30 years ago. As with the F-35, the F-16 had initial teething problems but it was ultimately successful. This may explain why the F-35 European partner nations have shown far more patience with the F-35's hurdles than Canadian critics have.
As for Canada not having a competitive bidding process before deciding on the F-35, neither did its JSF partners except the U.S., which chose Lockheed Martin's X-35 over Boeing's X-32 in an early design competition. The Japanese, who are not partners, did hold a competition and concluded the JSF was better than Boeing's Super Hornet and the Eurofighter consortium's Typhoon.
There is no competition to be had if you want stealth and a networked capability because there are no other western aircraft being produced now that have this. It is that simple.

I ABSOLUTELY LOVE IT!

Way to go buddy.  Cut through the nonsense of the "cabal" and get to brass tacks.  Matthew Fischer!  I gotta buy you a beer.

Four Ship...

U.S. Marine Corps AH-1W Cobra helicopters assigned to Marine Medium Helicopter Squadron (HMM) 265 fly in formation after taking off from the flight deck of the amphibious transport dock USS Denver (LPD 9) in the Pacific Ocean April 4, 2012. Denver was part of the Essex Amphibious Ready Group conducting operations in the Western Pacific. (DoD photo by Mass Communication Specialist Seaman Raul Moreno Jr., U.S. Navy/Released)

Update: Helicopter Sea Combat Squadrons

Personal observation.  They need to do something with those gunner locations...the arc of fire appears extremely limited and those stub wings seem pretty small.  Extend those and how about guided 2.75 rockets instead of hellfires and maybe podded 20mm cannons or bigger?

LEESEA (thanks bud!  I didn't even know these guys existed) tipped me to some information that escaped my notice.  The US Navy has established Helicopter Sea Combat Squadrons.  Why have I missed it?  Because all I've seen them doing online is ship board replinshment ops.  Well they have a much bigger mission scope.  This is from HSC-22's website.

Our Mission: To deploy helicopter detachments for Littoral Combat Ships, Amphibious Ready Groups and Combat Logistics Ships to perform Naval Special Warfare, Amphibious Search and Rescue, Theater Security Cooperation, Strike Coordination and Reconnaissance, Anti-Surface Warfare, Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief and Utility missions in support of the Fleet and our National Defense.

Our Vision: To be recognized as the Navy's premiere Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron by consistently accomplishing the mission and safeguarding our people, our most valuable resource.

Pretty damn impressive mission set...

I'd like to see it pared down to a pure combat and combat search/rescue mission set but helicopters are by their very nature multi-role.

I'll take what I can get.  This is the kind of stuff the Navy should be beating its chest and screaming at the moon about.  Go to HSC-22's website to read more about them.