via Flight Global.
The General's Club has made an estimation and decided that the "hand on the wheel that's driving the Marine Corps" needs to be fortified a bit.
Not one but two retired General's decided to make a statement on the Navy's F/A-XX project and the backing from that service on the F-35C.
You're starting to see the Club members speaking up on matters important to the Marine Corps...the first hint of this came with the Commandant's pronouncement to "stop embarassing the Corps" and now this.
I've stated before that Amos' time in the big chair will not be seen in the same light as General Gray's or Mundy's or Krulak's...this confirms it.
Retired USMC Lt Gen Emerson Gardner, a former principal deputy director of the Pentagon's Office of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (CAPE), says that there are lots of reasons to be sceptical about the USN's ability to fund the F/A-XX.Trust me on this one gents.
"It's not going to happen," Gardner says. "There's not going to be any money there."
Gardner says that the USN will probably not have any money for the programme in the fiscal year 2014 budget. Nor is it likely that the USN will ever come up with the $20 billion to $30 billion in research and development dollars to fund an F/A-XX development programme.
Gardner estimates the total cost of a new F/A-XX programme to be more than $40 billion and yield a maximum of 150 aircraft. The unit cost, he estimates, could be as much as $125 million per jet.
The USN simply does not have the money to pay for F/A-XX. With the USN's ship-building budgets squeezed, Gardner says that naval aviation accounts will likely end up being raided to help pay for submarines and surface ships.
The only place the money can come from is from within the F-35 programme, Gardner says. "There is a community over there that says 'let's just skip the F-35C, let's just keep buying F/A-18s and we'll go and develop this other airplane,'" he says.
"That's very dangerous for the carrier because it makes the carrier irrelevant. They are not going to have first-day capability. I'm absolutely convinced that if you do not have stealth by the year 2022 to 2025 you will be irrelevant."
Lt Gen George Trautman, a former USMC deputy commandant for aviation, concurs.
"It sort of validates the naval aviators' overall lack of commitment to the F-35," he says. "It shows how much they're in bed with Boeing to include a whole host of retired navy aviators who work for Boeing. And it shows, frankly, their lack of commitment to unmanned systems."
Gardner concurs that the USN's relationship with Boeing is playing a role in the service's push towards a new tactical fighter programme.
"I think it's Boeing. There is a huge Boeing lobby in the navy," Gardner says. "That has a lot to do with it."
The General's Club has made an estimation and decided that the "hand on the wheel that's driving the Marine Corps" needs to be fortified a bit.
Not one but two retired General's decided to make a statement on the Navy's F/A-XX project and the backing from that service on the F-35C.
You're starting to see the Club members speaking up on matters important to the Marine Corps...the first hint of this came with the Commandant's pronouncement to "stop embarassing the Corps" and now this.
I've stated before that Amos' time in the big chair will not be seen in the same light as General Gray's or Mundy's or Krulak's...this confirms it.