Tuesday, December 04, 2012

One of the neatest all terrain vehicles ever designed.

Yeah I'm on a WW2 kick (well a bit of one anyway) and looking at vehicles used by the Axis and Allies revealed what I believe to be is probably the neatest all terrain vehicle of the war and in the top ten of all time...the Volkswagen Type 166 'Schwimmwagen'.







Fairchild XC-120 Pack Plane

Some concepts are so awesome it makes you wonder why they didn't become standard fare in the aviation industry.  The pack plane is one of those concepts.  A detachable field hospital...command post...armory...disaster relief capsule..this could do it all.  Too bad it didn't make it.

Monday, December 03, 2012

The Small Boat Navy (1968)

SK-105 Light Tank. Dinosaur still in production...


The General Dynamics European Land Systems website lists the SK-105 as one of its products.  Whats even more interesting is that they list they list a mortar carrier and armored personnel carrier as variants of this vehicle.  I'm still looking for the APC version out of nothing but pure curiosity.  As a vehicle for airborne forces though it intrigues.  Lighter than the Stryker MGS system with a gun that works it can be loaded onto a C-130 without waiver.  More info to come.

On this and that...

I decided to do a post on a couple of things that caught my attention.  Its gonna vary widely so bear with me...

KA-Bar Becker BK2 Companion.


I bought one of these a couple of months ago and all I can say is wow.  Its more a short sword than a knife (I say that because of weight, not length) and can handle pretty much anything you can throw at it.  The carrying case is nice.  On shortcoming?  The nylon belt loop.  Not a problem for me.  I bought an attachment that allows me to remove the fabric belt attachment and replace it with a device so I can Scout carry it.  Act fast.  When I bought mine I got it for around 50 bucks.  They're over that now and rising fast.  Read a great review of this knife here.

Firearms for SHTF.

Everyone has their own way of thinking when it comes to an ideal weapon for when shit hits the fan (SHTF).

Lots of people swear by 5.56/223, 30/06, shotguns, three oh eights etc...

I think that the ultimate survival battery really includes only two weapons...don't get me wrong.  I have different tools for different things (and that's what guns are...either tools primarily or hobby instruments secondarily...oh and if you use them for self defense its a tool just like a club was for a caveman or a sword for a Samauri).  That would be a handgun and a .22 caliber rifle.  The handgun because in a true SHTF you're going to be working, getting stuff done if you want to live decently that is.  Our modern world has allowed many to forget how difficult just keeping clean can be when power is out, but I digress.  When you're feeding your chickens or gathering firewood or washing clothes you're not going to want to be unarmed.  Work has to get done but you have to be able to defend yourself.  That means a reliable handgun in a well built holster.  Next comes the need to harvest food in a true SHTF.  That's anything from squirrel, rabbits, deer and hogs.  A .22 works for all that if you're using the right bullets and have good shot placement.  Yeah hunting deer with a .22 can be considered inhumane but I know for a fact that some have done it and I know that those who do placed the shot where needed to take down the animal.  A .22 gives you the opportunity to practice like a madman, allows you to easily store enough ammo for not only yourself but also your kids kids.

If you know of anyone that is just starting the prepping journey then start them off with a .22 and a reliable handgun.

Water Storage.



My quick and dirty research on water storage shows exactly how far behind I am behind like thinking people.  Between those that have setup rainwater collection systems, to those that have some pretty elaborate automatic refill systems of their standard storage to those that not only have all of the above but also are growing food hydroponically and one family even transformed their swimming pool to a self sustaining mini-fishing pond.

I/We/US (I mean me and my readers that think like I do--if you don't cool, I don't hate, we just part ways on this subject) have alot to do.  Links coming up on some of the projects that just blew me away.

Challenger 2 Tank on Salisbury Plain



Scout Sniper Platoon, Weapons Company, Battalion Landing Team 3/5, 15th Marine Expeditionary Unit








Spanish Marines receive new Piranha APC's.




via Circle Trubia Blog.  Notice the Lancer Turret on one of the vehicles?  Another is sporting the Textron Systems manned turret.  The USMC has an opportunity (rather BAE does) to standardize the Western world's Marines Corps on the AAV upgrade as the standard or the winner of the Marine Personnel Carrier Contest.  Either vehicle could quickly become the standard vehicle for amphibious forces...think Leopard 2 but in APC form.

Japanese Type 10 Tank.












A beautiful tank but I wonder how survivable it can be at a mere 44 tons. Quite honestly its almost the same weight class as most IFV's now.  It is undoubtedly strategically mobile but is it survivable on the modern battlefield or are we seeing the re-birth of the tank destroyer in all but name?

Sunday, December 02, 2012

Russian Swimmer Delivery Vehicles.




 Covert Naval Blog appears to be dead now, but they have a fascinating series of articles on mini-subs and swimmer delivery vehicles.  Abpve are a few pics from one of their articles.  If you have an interest, I recommend you head over and grab a little info before the internet demons kill the pages forever.

E-2C Hawkeye

VENTURA, Calif. (Nov. 20, 2012) E-2C Hawkeye aircraft assigned to the Wallbangers of Carrier Airborne Early Warning Squadron (VAW) 117 fly over the Pacific Ocean near Ventura, Calif. VAW-117 is a command and control and airborne early Warning Squadron dedicated to deliver time critical situational awareness to warfare commanders and coalition partners. (U.S. Navy photo by Command Master Chief Spike Call/Released) 121120-N-ZZ999-005

VENTURA, Calif. (Nov. 20, 2012) E-2C Hawkeye aircraft assigned to the Wallbangers of Carrier Airborne Early Warning Squadron (VAW) 117 fly over the Pacific Ocean near Ventura, Calif. VAW-117 is a command and control and airborne early Warning Squadron dedicated to deliver time critical situational awareness to warfare commanders and coalition partners. (U.S. Navy photo by Command Master Chief Spike Call/Released) 121120-N-ZZ999-008

Prepping. You're doing it wrong and lessons from a Sandy survivor.


Quite honestly I've been wanting to do a post on this subject...
1.  On why we haven't heard anything from preppers that went through the Sandy.
2.  Why I think most preppers are doing it wrong.

The first got answered.  You can go here to read a list of one survivors experiences...a few tidbits though...
*You quickly become the guy in the neighborhood who knows how to wire a generator to the electrical panel, directly wire the furnace to a small generator, or get the well pump up and running on inverter power or you are the guy whose Master’s degree in Accounting suddenly means nothing. (Love you Steve!)*I was surprised how many things run on electricity!*. If you do not have water stored up you are in trouble.
  • a. A couple of cases of bottled water is “NOT” water storage
If you check out most prepping videos on YouTube they always focus on firearms/get home bags/bug out vehicles etc...That's just not how things normally work.

Bugging in will more than likely be the default position for most people.  So making your home "fortified" as in livable in a power down situation makes sense.  Additionally guns and bags are neat.  They're fun.  They're hobbies in most cases.

A gun for use by preppers is a self defense  and harvesting tool.  You can defend yourself from two legged vermin and you can use it to harvest food.  To emphasize your hobby instead of actually preparing for bad times will cost alot of people.  Most notably is water.  That's one of my take aways from the Sandy Storm.  When the grid goes down, water goes away.  And unfortunately we use a helluva lot more than we realize.  I'm personally going to try and determine how much I use a day and then plan accordingly.  Something tells me that those 55 gallon water containers I've been looking at will get pushed up in priorities.

Food is another take away.  I'll never forget the lady saying that she was gonna die unless she got help.  That's another pressure on your water supply.  Food prep and sanitation.  Having enough food to last for at least a month should be the baseline from the experience with Sandy.  Quite honestly, probably two months should be the base.  USGOV website talking 72 hours is unmitigated bullshit.  Even winter storms cause outages that last longer.

Last but not least the biggest takeaway was that during these type situations the last place I want to be is in a government shelter.  I can't confirm the stories but if you search the internet you'll see stories that make prison look as welcoming as some of the places they were sheltering people.  I also remember the issues with Katrina and personally vow that I will never let myself or loved ones become "wards" of the state or federal government.

Preppers.  We're doing it wrong.  Time to go back to the drawing board.

*Note*  For those of you that don't prep, no problem.  I'm sure you'll be fine.  

One-man foxhole protects against tanks. ( FM 5-15: Field Fortifications, U.S. War Department, February 1944.)

via Lone Sentry Blog.

I'm really surprised that the training manuals from that time didn't emphasize the need for grenade sumps or reinforcement in sandy conditions.  I've read too many stories about Tiger tanks simply spinning in place burying troops in the defense.

Saturday, December 01, 2012

USS Enterprise infographic.


Son of a bitch! They already made the move to put women in the infantry!

Feel good lady.  You and yours took what many men failed to earn...all because you have ovaries and leadership that's too scared to call bullshit on bullshit.

via the Daily Reporter...

SAN DIEGO — Marine 1st Lt. Brandy Soublet is about as far from the war front as possible at her desk in the California desert, but she's on the front lines of an experiment that could one day put women as close to combat as their male peers.
The Penfield, New York woman is one of 45 female Marines assigned this summer to 19 all-male combat battalions. The Defense Department in the past year has opened thousands of combat positions to women to slowly integrate them and gauge the impact such a social change would have on the military's ability to fight wars.
No branch is likely to feel that change more than the Marine Corps.
The small, tight-knit force is the most male of the armed services and prides itself on having the toughest and most aggressive warriors. The Corps historically has higher casualty rates because it is considered to be the "tip of the spear," or the first to respond to conflicts. It also was among the last military branches to open its doors to women, forming the first female Corps in 1943, according to the Women's Memorial in Washington D.C.
But changing times are challenging the traditions of the force, long likened to a brotherhood.
Modern warfare has put women in combat like never before over the past decade, even though a 1994 policy bars them from being assigned to ground combat units below the brigade level, which were considered too dangerous since they are often smaller and closer to combat for longer periods.
Already under pressure to provide the same opportunities for women, the Defense Department was hit Tuesday with a second lawsuit by female service members — including two Marines — charging that the gender barriers unfairly block them from promotions open to men in combat.
The lawsuits are intended to accelerate the military's slow march toward lifting the ban that plaintiffs allege has barred women from 238,000 positions.
Defense officials say they recently opened 14,500 jobs to women, and they need to move cautiously to ensure the change will not disrupt wartime operations. Soublet and the other 44 women are part of the quiet, slow transformation. Women make up about 7 percent of the Marine Corps compared to about 14 percent overall among the military's 1.4 million active military personnel.
She said some Marines initially eyed her pioneering presence in the all-male battalion with skepticism.
"The way that I would describe it to friends and family was it was kind of like I showed up to work in a costume," the 25-year-old logistics officer said in a phone interview from Twenty-Nine Palms, a remote desert base east of San Diego. "They stared a little bit but after a while it wasn't like that anymore."
That experience may play out on bases and boats worldwide as the Pentagon levels the battlefield.
The Corps earlier this year opened its grueling infantry officer training school to female Marines and surveyed 53,000 of its troops with an anonymous online questionnaire about the impact of erasing gender barriers. Survey results are expected to be released soon after review by the defense secretary.
Only two female Marines volunteered for the 13-week infantry training course at Quantico, Virginia, and both failed to complete it this fall. No women have volunteered so far for the next course offered in January, officials said.
Soublet said she was nervous she would feel unwelcome in the combat engineer battalion.
Six months into her historic assignment, she said she has been treated equally.
"I have heard, you know, whisperings, like 'Hey, before you got here we decided to maybe take down some pictures and clean up our language a little bit,' but other than that, they haven't really expressed anything to me," said Soublet, who will remain two years in her battalion and is expected to deploy with them to Afghanistan this spring.
The Marine Corps Commandant Gen. James F. Amos said he met with the top leaders of the 19 battalions and told them to establish the proper command climate. The early steps of assigning females to artillery, tank, combat engineer and other all-male battalions have been successful, but there may be some anxiety if women join infantry, Amos said.
Camp Pendleton combat Marine Carlos Laguna, who left the Corps in 2011, agreed.
"The screams of women, they have a big psychological effect on men. A woman just has a different pitch," said Laguna, who suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder after two tours in Iraq. "If we're in a firefight and a woman is shot or lost her arm, male Marines like me would want to stop and help. It's our nature to help women."
The survey addressed those concerns, asking males if they would be distracted or "feel obligated to protect female Marines." It also asked whether women would be limited because of pregnancy or personal issues.
Female Marines were asked if they would feel pressured to suppress their femininity.
Former Marine Capt. Kristen Kavanaugh, who runs The Military Acceptance Project, a San Diego-based organization promoting equality in the services, found those questions offensive.
"I don't think women who signed up to give their life for their country are worried about the appearance of their femininity," she said.
Former Camp Pendleton Marine Capt. Anu Bhagwati was only the second woman to complete a martial arts instructor training school, earning a black belt in close combat techniques. But she said years of discrimination caused her to quit in 2004.
"I learned early on that the Marine Corps will expect you to fail if you are a woman," said the head of the Service Women's Action Network, which helped the women file the lawsuit. "I faced so much discrimination and sexual harassment that it made me wonder why I was serving."
Soublet said in her three years in the Corps she has found her fellow Marines to be respectful and professional.
"This isn't a big deal," she said. "We're Marines, we're here to do a job and it doesn't matter what our gender is."
The worse part?

The total lack of institutional honesty.  I've seen it from the Commandant's Office, the SgtMajor of the Marine Corps office and from extensions such as USNI.

Instead of honestly telling Marines that women will be allowed in combat per orders of the President of the United States they've fed us all bullshit.

I find the fact that social change is more important to the Marine Corps than winning the war that we're in and getting ready for the next one disturbing.  We have a child in the white house and it seems we have cowards in the Pentagon...but most especially in and around the Commandant's lair.  The lack of leadership will be the reoccurring theme when the history of the Marine Corps during this era is written.  From Jones up to Amos these bastards will be vilified---and rightfully so.  

Japanese Type 1 Ho-Ki Armored Personnel Carrier: One of the world's first "modern" APC design.




stats via Lone Sentry Blog (you really should subscribe if you have an interest in WW2).
 U.S. intelligence report and photograph of the "Ho-Ki Armored Tracked Personnel Carrier" appeared in the Catalog of Enemy Ordnance:This vehicle serves as an artillery prime mover and as a personnel carrier for 24 men. It appears to be of recent manufacture, and its first known appearance in combat was during the Leyte campaign in the Philippines.
It is a full-tracked vehicle armored with 1/4-inch plate throughout. The engine which is located at the right front of the body is a 6-cylinder, in-line, valve-in-head, air-cooled diesel of a type similar to those used in the Model 2595 light tank and the combination prime mover and wrecker. Two fuel tanks provide an estimated total capacity of 50 to 60 gallons.
The tracks and suspension are of the conventional Japanese design, using dual bogie wheels and a steel center guide track. The four bogie wheels, apparently identical with those on the Model 2595 light tank, are mounted on bell cranks and are sprung by horizontal coil springs which are inclosed within the body armor with only the bogie arms exposed. There are two return rollers. The track is driven from the rear. A clutch and brake steering system is used. The transmission provides four speeds forward and one reverse. A high and low transfer case is also provided.
A mount for a 7.7 mm machine gun is located on the left front of the driver’s compartment. The vehicle does not mount a winch, but is provided with a spring mounted towing pintle for use as a prime mover. It has a capacity of from 2 to 3 tons if used as a cargo carrier. Maximum speed is reported as approximately 35 miles per hour, with exceptionally good cross-country performance due to the amount of track area in contact with the ground in relation to the weight of the vehicle.
SPECIFICATIONS
Length (overall)     15 ft., 9 ins.
Width (overall)6 ft., 8 ins.
Ground contact9 ft., 10 ins.
Width of track10 ins.
Pitch of track3-13/16 ins.
Track links125
Speed (maximum)35 m.p.h.
Armor (reported)1/4 in.
Armament7.7 mm machine gun
Engine6-cylinder, in-line, valve-in-head, diesel.
Transmission4 speeds forward, 1 reverse; high and low range.
SteeringClutch and brake system
Seating capacity24


This vehicle along with the LVT series, M75 and the other Japanese amphibious vehicles could easily be called the first modern APCs.  They all laid out the basic framework for what we have today.

Wild Hog Kill. Don't watch if squeamish.



I'm really getting into this wild boar hunting in a big way.  Year round hunts without a sideways glance from Game Wardens?  Love it!

Anyway, I learned a couple of things that I thought I'd pass on to you...

1.  They have built up scar tissue which explains why they're so hard to put down and why bullet placement is so important.  It runs from the neck past the rib-cage which is why you can hit them and they bounce up and scamper away.

2.  They're a bigger problem than most people are admitting.  The PETA types are putting our natural resources in jeopardy because of the restrictions on hunting that they've put in place in some of the more liberal areas of the country.  They're called a nuisance species for a reason.

3.  There are actually people that kill them with knives.  I don't have the courage to try that.  250 pounds of wild boar trying its best to rip my throat with its tusks indicates a need for firepower.  Still some are really into it.

4.  Trained dogs make it easier but I just couldn't see risking it with my animals.  I've seen pics of dogs that got shredded and its not a pleasant sight.

5.  They make you earn the kill.  Unless you have scouted the area pretty thoroughly and know there patterns (which could change if they start seeing TOO much human activity).  Expect to find them in the thickest, swampiest, rat and snake infested areas of a property...unless you're able and willing to set up feed stations for them...even then it can be hit and miss.

6.  Sows are good.  Piglets are good.  Boars are terrible.  Tasting that is.  I never took the chance cause the meat always smelled so rank when I tried to dress one big boar I took.  It was confirmed by some old timers I talked to.  Don't even mess with them...and definitely don't try and cook it out.  You won't be able to stay in your house for a week.  You can cook it well, chop it up and feed it to your dogs.  Don't let them eat it raw though.  The dangers of that should be obvious.

Last but not least.  If you care for your natural habitat then do your community a favor and kill a wild pig.