Friday, November 01, 2019

Protolab’s PMPV 6x6 demoing capabilities.



Does anyone know of an MRAP type vehicle that swims?  I'm fuzzy but can't think of one at the moment.  Fill in the gap if you know of one.

Thursday, October 31, 2019

Open Comment Post. 31 Oct 2019


The CH-53K Has the Tools to Survive (video)





USMC places order for third lot of low rate production ACVs..This is procurement done right!


via Press Release.
 BAE Systems has received a $120 million contract from the U.S. Marine Corps for additional Amphibious Combat Vehicles under a third order for Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP). This award is an important next step on the path to full rate production.

This latest contract is for the ACV personnel carrier variant (ACV-P), an eight-wheeled amphibious assault vehicle capable of transporting Marines from open-ocean ship to shore and conducting land operations. Each vehicle embarks 13 Marines in addition to a crew of three.

“This award further validates the Marine Corps’ confidence in the vehicle’s proven capability in meeting their amphibious mission, and represents an important step toward fielding the vehicle in the Fleet Marine Force. The ACV is a highly mobile, survivable and adaptable platform designed for growth to meet future mission role requirements while bringing enhanced combat power to the battlefield,” said John Swift, director of amphibious programs at BAE Systems.

Current low-rate production is focused on the ACV-P variant. More variants will be added under full rate production to include the command and control (ACV-C), 30mm medium caliber turret (ACV-30) and recovery variants (ACV-R) under the ACV Family of Vehicles program. BAE Systems previously received the Lot 1 and Lot 2 awards.

The Marine Corps selected BAE Systems along with teammate Iveco Defence Vehicles for the ACV program in 2018 to replace its legacy fleet of Assault Amphibious Vehicles, which have been in service for decades and were also built by BAE Systems.
We often talk on these pages about our broken/dysfunctional procurement system.

This isn't one.

This is procurement done right!

Additional you can't help but cheer the upcoming family of vehicles based on this variant. 

Even better?

I can imagine that several other variants could be coming online, to include the possibility of a mobile gun system, mortar carrier (hopefully turreted) and maybe even other types.

On cost, within budget and on time.  It just don't get any better.

The BAE/Iveco Team executed on this to win the project and the continue to shine today.

Well done.

Wednesday, October 30, 2019

Tuesday, October 29, 2019

US Marines take over HMS Queen Elizabeth...






What was that?  We're not taking over the QE?  Dude!  We're manning the ship.  Our planes are on it's deck.  Not for a visitation but for a cruise.  Our aircraft will dramatically outnumber the ones they have.

But, but, but what about all the carriers in port?

The America Class and other LHAs are at sea.  If this isn't playing game with our unit deployment schedule then I don't know what the planners are thinking.

In other words, the QE is now an American asset being driven by Royal Navy Sailors to take US Marines where they need to go to get to the fight.

Who needs Canada when we have the UK as our lap...

JUST JOKING!

I guess this is interoperability right?  Don't understand the concept but hey if that bit of propaganda works for the US DoD and the UK MoD then who am I to disagree.

F-35's produced BEFORE its received clearance for full rate production????


via MSN Money.
Falling production costs will open up additional international sales opportunities for the F-35, Ken Possenriede, chief financial officer for Bethesda, Maryland-based Lockheed Martin, said during the company’s Oct. 22 earnings call. Lockheed is on track to hit the $80 million target in production lot 13, he said, about the middle of the multiyear contract.

Lockheed rose as much as 1.3% to $375.45 Monday after Bloomberg News reported that the so-called block buy talks were concluded. The stock had advanced 42% this year through Friday, double the gain of the S&P 500.

The latest agreement brings to about 978 the number of U.S. and allied jets on contract out of a planned total of at least 3,100. The jet is still months away from the completion of rigorous combat testing against the toughest Russian and Chinese threats.
Story here. 

Consider this your annual pound on the table, rant about how we're doing procurement blog post.

Fact 1.  News came out and the usual fanboys have been stopping by practically foaming at the mouth about the recent buy of F-35s.

I can live with that.  If you're a supporter of the plane then that is good news.

Fact 2.  This MUST be beyond illegal.  Think about it.  almost 1000 planes have been/will be produced before its actually cleared its "combat certification".  That testing has been postponed till the end of 2020.

Fact 3.  The US govt has allowed a combat plane that has been nothing but development trouble to almost complete 1/3rd of its production run before we know if its even suitable for PRODUCTION!

This has to be criminal but no one is calling this for what it.

The F-35 IS the biggest procurement scandal in the history of military projects.

Irritation of the week. Killing the ISIS Leader in Syria is not a war winning development!

By now you've read about the Delta Force raid to kill the ISIS leader is Syria.  If you haven't then read about it here.

But table that part of things and let's focus on the bigger part. 

This isn't a war winning development!

How many raids have been conducted to kill or capture high value insurgents? Has it brought us closer to winning the wars?  I personally think not.  The fascination that the media has with the latest op has more to do with US politics (IMO) than it does with the efficacy of this approach.

Instead of taking a sober look at our efforts in the region, we're getting a mix of flag waving along with moralizing over the decision to pull out, correction, redeploy our forces to a different part of that country.

Don't get me wrong.

SOCOM is elite.

That force is carrying a burden in this fight that is heavy indeed.

But their way of war is/has failed.  If we're gonna be honest, its obvious that ISIS is so compartmentalized, so fragmented and has so many different moving parts that the killing of leadership will have no material effect on the fighting.

To be brutally honest, SOCOM is fighting ISIS like they're a conventional force, not a terrorist/hybrid organization.

Bin Laden is dead and it hasn't made the fighting in Afghanistan go away.  This bubba is also dead and my bet is it won't change things in Syria.

That's my take.  That's my irritation.  But don't just throw things and get mad, tell me where I'm wrong.

MAG-36 Rapid Deployment Exercise....Video by Lance Cpl. Gerardo Cano

Open Comment Post. 29 Oct 2019