This is the new "King of Thailand"?????

Thanks to William for the link!

Are you seeing this?  If not take another look at the pics above.  The middle aged man-child wearing hip hugger jeans, sporting a freaking halter top is the new king of Thailand.

Yeah.  Drink in those pics again.

I wouldn't let that freak feed my dog much less represent my country.  Save your venom.  I know you're not suppose to judge a book by its cover but give me a break.  Somewhere deep inside you're saying the same.

Goodness.  I thought we were fucked.  Thailand is in a shitlocker.  Story on this yuts trip to Germany here.

China J-20 Stealth Fighter Flight Testing Vid

Open Comment Post. Oct 13, 2016.

MMMM!  Coffee!

Nothing to talk about today except our totally dysfunctional, illogical and inept use/application of military force in the Middle East.  We just lobbed missiles at the Houthis and I can't for the life of me ever remember them giving a fuck about the US.

Yeah.  That's how you make friends in the world.  You side with losers and idiots (Saudis) and you alienate those that had no opinion of you one way or the other.

Is it just me or is it past time that our civilian and military leaders level with us about what the real goals are in that region?  Everyone focuses on whether Trump groped a female 20 years ago (or even further back for a hag I saw on television last night) but no one is asking questions of real importance.

We're so screwed as a country.

At least we have the gym, coffee, beef and pre-workouts.

US attacks Houthi radar sites.

Thanks to Pete for the link!

via RT

The US military has carried out a series of “limited self-defence strikes” in Yemen, the Pentagon has announced. The attack, authorized by President Obama, was carried out in retaliation to recent attacks on the US naval destroyer, USS Mason.

According to the Pentagon’s initial assessments, three “radar sites” in the Houthi rebel-controlled area of Yemen were destroyed in the attack.
The attack on coastal targets was carried out by Tomahawk cruise missiles launched from the destroyer USS Nitze, NPR reported. According to US officials all targets were “in remote areas, where there was little risk of civilian casualties or collateral damage.”
“These limited self-defense strikes were conducted to protect our personnel, our ships, and our freedom of navigation in this important maritime passageway,” the statement reads.

Rant.

I fucking hate the Saudis.  They bit off more than they could chew and now they're dragging us into their idiocy.  I hate the Neo-Cons.  They want constant war and they're dragging the US down into a swamp of perpetual combat that will have untold effects on our society.

Finally, I hate the President, supposedly a smart man that tap dances to the beat of the Saudis.  He should know better.  He supposedly doesn't want war.  Yet everything he's done in the past two years has made things worse.

Navy Corpsmen are now called "Medics"

Wow.

I've been monitoring the mess with the Navy rating system and how everyone and their mother except the SecNav is pissed with the changes.

Quite honestly I didn't give a fuck.  The SecNav screwed the Marine Corps so hard and got so little resistance (and in the case of the traitorous bastards inhabiting USNI Blog...the fuckers over there know who I'm referring to and that includes certain writers AND their enablers in the staff) that I found it nothing but right that the Navy got their turn bent over Mabus' desk getting ass fucked into submission.

But I should have known better.

No tradition is safe.

Corpsmen.  Those special Sailors (that are really Marines but walked into the wrong recruiting office) that would run thru hell itself to help a wounded man don't get to keep their legacy intact.

Now they're called that lower form of creature (don't get me wrong...they're cool, just not as cool) known as Medics.

I weep for the US military.

5 Canadian Mechanized Brigade Group Recon Section does helo-casting ops (pics)

Canadian Combat Camera posted the captions in French and my translate has been acting iffy.  Not sure if I have the right unit involved in this training evolution.

Open Comment Post. Oct 12, 2016

Nothing much to talk about.  The world is in chaos but continues to spin.  I'm tired of this election and that's about it.  The only good thing is I had a good workout.

Army Airborne is morphing. Are we seeing the rebirth of the 9th Infantry Division (Motorized) under canopy?

via Fayobserver.

The "Airborne FARP" being tested by the 82nd Combat Aviation Brigade could help Army helicopters reach the ground forces that train to parachute into enemy territory under the cover of darkness.

A FARP, or forward arming and refueling point, provides fuel and ammunition for helicopter crews.

Often, they are located at forward operating bases or airfields in areas with existing military security.

The 82nd Airborne wants to be able to place them well beyond the reach of those bases and closer to the front lines of battle. To do that, the 82nd is developing procedures to airdrop components of a FARP and the soldiers who would operate it.

That would extend the reach of helicopters, which unlike much of the 82nd Airborne's equipment, cannot be dropped from a plane.

And then this.

Three large packages slid from the back of the plane as massive parachutes filled with air above them. The air drops - which included simulated fuel, a pump system, ammunition and a Humvee - fell silently, punctuated by a reverberating thud upon landing.

Minutes later, the C-17 again flew over the drop zone. This time, it released about 50 paratroopers into the air.

Twenty soldiers, mostly assigned to A Company, 122nd Aviation Support Battalion, worked with little light and virtually no noise, unpacking the pump system, known as an Advanced Aviation Forward Area Refueling System, or AAFARS, and hooking it up to real fuel, delivered to the drop zone via truck to replace the water dropped as part of the exercise.

So let me get this straight.

The 82nd wants to be able to drop paratroopers, JLTVs (for recon), whatever they're calling the "ground mobility vehicle" to transport the paratroops, a new light tank, artillery, prime movers for the artillery and now they want to add an Airborne FARP to the list?

I won't even touch the USAF's ability to provide lift for all that.  I am gonna question what the end goal is.

What the fuck are they trying to do?

Historically the 82nd has been known as some pretty decent light infantry.
 Little Groups of Paratroops was their motto and they did the hard thing and did it well.

Now?

It seems like they're trying to morph into a medium weight force.  I have no problem if that's the goal, but to try and put all that gear under canopy is a fool's errand.  Quite honestly if I didn't know better I'd think that we're looking at the rebirth of the 9th Infantry Division (Motorized/Airborne).

A new twist on Space 1999's Eagle.

A little off topic but I've always been a fan of Space 1999.  The star of the show in my opinion was Carter and the Eagle Space Transporter (the Hawks were cool too).  Well leave it to sci-fi guys to come up with a new twist on a classic.  I'm not sure I like it but it is interesting.

 

US jets painted in Russian colors. A false flag?

Its time to squash this nonsense with a quickness.  I've been getting all kinds of e-mails talking about US jets painted like their Russian counterparts and how this is to do a "false flag" operation in Syria.

This story first appeared on Superstation 95 (never heard of them before) and its gone viral.  Today while looking at my feeds I saw that even Iran's Press TV had picked up the story.

How about using a little common sense people!  First the US has had aggressor squadrons with aircraft painted to represent threat forces for years. Its even done on the ground side at the Army's National Training Center.  Second, how are you gonna do a false flag in Syria?  The radar coverage of that region is INTENSE!  Aircraft are tracked from takeoff to landing to include military airplanes.  Amazingly enough you still have civilian traffic in the area so there is NO WAY it could be pulled off without either the Russians, Syrians, Iranians, Turks or someone that has an axe to grind couldn't detect.

And last but not least there are better ways to do it.  A cruise missile, an information campaign accusing the Russians of bombing a hospital and that lie would be around the world twice before they could properly refute it.

I'm all for conspiracy theories but make them fucking plausible!

CDR Salamander responds to my musing...must read!

I did an earlier blog post (here) and made this closing statement...

 I do wonder though.  CDR Salamander is one of those old skool, cold warriors.  He was playing big boy games in the Atlantic with hard core Russian sub commanders when I was still reading comic books and dreaming of banging my first girl.  Is this nostalgia or an actual thing?  I still hold out hope that we can bring Russia into our camp.

Sal responded on the blog in the comments section and its too good to leave there and needed to be "popped out" so that everyone could drink it in...

Actually, I have no desire to have any possibility for conflict with Russia, or even getting close to it. (I cover this thread more on twitter than my homeblog). We used to have Soviet SSBN between the E. Coast and Bermuda, 15-min SLBM flight from nuclear war. No thank you. I lived through that once, no desire to live through it again. If we could be smart about it, we have more to gain by working with the Russians in certain areas - such as Syria - than giving them reasons to want to restart rivalry. But, if they want to dance, then we have to dance. It didn't have to be this way, but it is. We have done a lot of Russia shows on Midrats if you'd like to get more detail on some of my thoughts.

Just taking a look around the military blogosphere, it seems that everyone is in agreement.  No one wants a fight with Russia.  It will be nasty beyond imagination.  But the part that I highlighted from Sal's response is important.

"If they want to dance, then we have to dance."

Policy wonks and politicians are driving us to a point that the military would rather avoid, but if they want to dance then we have no choice.

Saddle up boys and girls.  Looks like the Cold War is back on.

About the Houthis supposedly firing on our ship...

I'm sure you all have heard about the Houthis firing anti-ship missiles at our vessels.

I can't get excited because the story is changing and I personally think we're getting a messaging campaign instead of the truth.

Remember when this first came out?  First we heard that the missiles fell short and crashed into the sea.  Next we heard that they were simply RPGs or some other type of rocket and they were never really a threat.

Now we hear that the ships were actually fighting for survival and they expended 3(?) missiles against threatening incoming anti-ship missiles?

I'm not a ship guy but that don't sound right.

I was always told (maybe it's bro science) that for every incoming anti-ship missile the defending ship would fire two anti-missile missiles.  The Houthis fired two missiles.  By bro science they should have had at least 4 missiles in the air and if I was running the ship I'd have at least 6, if not more in order to safeguard my ship.

From my chair this don't sound right.  I stand ready to be corrected but my bullshit meter is spiking on this.