Accueillir les détaches étrangers dans le cadre défilé 21 Juillet demandes beaucoup de coordinations et de moyens . Merci aux unités d'appui de travailler dans l'ombre pour que tout arrive à temps et dans de bonne conditions.#Support #CombatSupport pic.twitter.com/xeAPFL9jTE— Belgian Army (@Belgian_Army) July 19, 2019
Friday, July 19, 2019
French Army Griffon VBMR 6x6 multi-role armored vehicles arrive in Belgium for July 21 parade...
Production of T129 ATAK helicopters has stopped...
Thanks to S300V4 for the link!
What do I mean? The tank. Dominate for awhile then anti-tank missiles were developed. The battleship. Once dominate but then overtaken by aircraft carriers.
Sanctions. They're obviously crippling now, but will there come a time when we see an international black market ran by nation states to subvert them?
I can't help but think we're using this "tool" so often that countermeasures will/are being developed.
Turkey's defense industry is gonna take a huge hit because of their decision to pursue the S-400. But it does bring up another issue. What happens when you use a weapon to such a degree that people develop countermeasures?#BREAKING: Production of T129 ATAK helicopters for #Turkey's Gendarmerie General Command & #Pakistan Army Aviation is now stopped in #Turkish Aerospace Industries (#HAI) facility due to the fact that Rolls Royce has stopped delivering LHTEC CTS800-4A turboshaft engines for T129. pic.twitter.com/tlQ7k0WvCN— Babak Taghvaee (@BabakTaghvaee) July 19, 2019
What do I mean? The tank. Dominate for awhile then anti-tank missiles were developed. The battleship. Once dominate but then overtaken by aircraft carriers.
Sanctions. They're obviously crippling now, but will there come a time when we see an international black market ran by nation states to subvert them?
I can't help but think we're using this "tool" so often that countermeasures will/are being developed.
Thursday, July 18, 2019
Royal Air Force CH-47 aerial pics...
via David Van Bouwel's Twitter Page...
#Chinook #helicopter #Wales trip // #LFA // #aviation #aviationphotography // @SonyAlpha #sonya7riii @SonyAlphaU @MachLoopLFA7 @MachLoopUK @MachLoopWales @verticalmag @HelisDatabase @helihub pic.twitter.com/23J7m2Zg3x— David Van Bouwel🇧🇪 (@ilCostro) July 18, 2019
UK Royal Air Force seeks a Mach 4 Airplane to combat Russia's Avangard Hypersonic Glide Vehicle...
via Sputnik (story here).
The UK’s Royal Air Force (RAF) has announced plans to create a hypersonic plane which will be capable of flying at more than 3,000 miles (almost 5,000 kilometres) per hour.
Speaking at the Air and Space Power conference on Wednesday, Air Chief Marshal Stephen Hillier, the head of the RAF, unveiled the two-year project, which stipulates that the Ministry of Defence will inject $12 billion into the development of new hypersonic engines over the next two years.
He underscored that the sophisticated engines, which he said will allow the new plane to tackle enemy air defences at a speed of more than Mach 4, or four times the speed of sound, would be “exploring the boundaries of technology”.
-----------------------------
The statement comes as Russia, China and the US continue to develop their hypersonic weapons. The first hypersonic missile was unveiled by Russian President Vladimir Putin during his address to the country’s Federal Assembly in 2018, when he showcased several types of cutting-edge Russian weaponry.Below is a pic of the Avangard hypersonic glide vehicle...
The Avangard hypersonic glide vehicle is capable of flying at a speed of 20 Mach and higher, remaining unsusceptible to being targeted by existing enemy air defence systems. Avangard is expected to enter service before the end of 2019.
Objekt 4202 / Yu-71 / Yu-74 |
Air Accident in Nepal...
In Nepal— Kevin Sky🎖️𐱅𐰇𐰼𐰜 𐰶𐰃𐰯𐰲𐰴 (@EmirLouise) July 18, 2019
Video by Yoel Fuentes on Facebook pic.twitter.com/d12JRgKUJV
Uninformed speculation about the drone shootdown...the real story is that USMC Low Altitude Air Defense Battalions are back!
The armchair generals have started weighing in and talk is raging about the Marines aboard the USS Boxer shooting down an Iranian drone. There is ONE journalist that's plucking nerves with so called statements of fact when the effective range of the system (to my knowledge) has never been disclosed. Check out the Tweet below.
For her to state unequivocally that the range of the weapon system MUST BE 1,000 yards is frustrating in the extreme.President Donald Trump says a US ship "destroyed" an Iranian drone.— Barbara Starr (@barbarastarrcnn) July 18, 2019
He said the drone came within 1,000 yards of the USS Boxer and ignored "multiple calls to stand down." If accurate destroyed at 1,000 yards tells us lethal range of US electronic warfare that brought it down. https://t.co/oOf3yeSvbl
We just don't know the factors involved. How many times did they broadcast warnings? What was the established "kill zone" for aircraft (manned and/or unmanned) and vessels (manned/unmanned) in the region?
The list of variables goes on.
What should get everyone's attention is that US Marine Corps Low Altitude Air Defense Battalions are back!
Singapore produces the Unmanned Hunter IFV variant...
Watch the above vid carefully. Rewatch it. The implication is that Singapore is producing unmanned Hunter IFVs.Some weeks back, the SAF introduced the Hunter, a fully digitalised Armoured Fighting Vehicle, produced by ST Engineering. I congratulated them for this achievement. Here’s a vid of other platforms in the pipeline, including an Unmanned Ground Vehicle and the Bronco 3. pic.twitter.com/BhvmrqA9DX— Ng Eng Hen (@Ng_Eng_Hen) July 17, 2019
Need more proof? Check this out via David Boey's Twitter Page...
I hope you took the time to head over to his blog to check out the awesome article he wrote.From 1999 to 2004, Singapore's Defence Science & Technology Agency DSTA led Project Ulysses to test unmanned vehicle technology on an M113. This led to the unmanned Hunter AFV. More here: https://t.co/ZmCoL6ed5f pic.twitter.com/uKWy3gG3YH— David Boey (@SenangDiri) July 18, 2019
The basic question.
What do you do with an unmanned IFV? Scout/Mech Recon? Casualty evacuation? Engineer duties?
We'll get the answer soon enough. The implication appears confirmed. Singapore is first in the West to fielding a large, armored, and unmanned IFV.
US preparing to send hundreds of troops to Saudi Arabia amid Iran tensions
via CNN
The Trump administration is reinforcing its controversial military relationship with Saudi Arabia by preparing to send hundreds of troops to the country amid increasing tensions with Iran.Story here.
Five-hundred troops are expected to go to the Prince Sultan Air Base, located in a desert area east of the Saudi capital of Riyadh, according to US two defense officials. A small number of troops and support personnel are already on site with initial preparations being made for a Patriot missile defense battery as well as runway and airfield improvements, the officials said.
The US has wanted to base troops there for some time because security assessments have shown Iranian missiles would have a difficult time targeting the remote area.
I'm.
Not.
Buying.
It.
It might be the Iran threat from a big picture but if you get a bit closer to the issue I believe this is all about the Houthis hitting Riyadh and one of the GCC coalition partners pulling out.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/houthi-missile-strike-hits-saudi-airport-injuring-26/2019/06/12/55cb5032-8d0c-11e9-b162-8f6f41ec3c04_story.html
I could be wrong but this is my gut reaction.
The Future of China's Amphibious Assault Fleet via The Diplomat...
via The Diplomat.
The PLAN amphibious assault fleet is likely to enjoy further expansion between now and the mid 2020s. Key projects to watch include the 075 LHD family, whether the 071 LPD family will be further expanded or not, and whether the PLAA landing ship fleet will be further sustained and recapitalized.Story here.
I started with the end. READ THIS ARTICLE! I follow Rick Joe on Twitter and you should too. He gives some of the best info on the Chinese military/weapon systems that I've read on the web.
How good is he? He's on my Twitter List as a "must read" everyday.
Off topic. I'm watching the Chinese build their Marine Corps (attempting) up to USMC standards. What's missing? A STOVL airplane.
Why wouldn't they pursue such a thing?
This is mere speculation on my part and a sore spot for some, but I think they've probably looked at the calculus and decided that a STOVL airplane just wasn't worth the effort.
Question.
What would the USMC look like if we did away with fast movers off our LHD/LHAs and instead teamed with the Navy and had all our planes operating off carriers?
Would we see a reduction in the utility of our MEUs?
Is this an exquisite capability that just isn't worth it historically? I'm not sure. Can you think of an operation where the 6 or so Harriers (looking at the past) could have made a difference? Can you think of a time when an MEU went into even light combat without the support of a carrier?
I can't.
USMC historians step up and correct me where I'm wrong. USMC tacticians/conceptualist step up and tell me why we're so wedded to this idea.
Just because we've had a capability since the 1960's (or around that time frame) doesn't mean that it makes sense moving forward.
The Chinese for all intents in purposes don't see the utility. I'd like to know if they're onto something or if we're buying an EXPENSIVE capability with little practicality.
I'm just asking the question...don't shoot the messenger!
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)